Who’s asking? Social platform and research sponsors’ identity biases in guests’ hospitality experience-reviews: a case study of Spanish hotels

IF 11.9 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management Pub Date : 2023-08-14 DOI:10.1080/19368623.2023.2244467
Arch G Woodside, Pedro Mir-Bernal, Teresa Sabada Garraza, Patricia San Miguel
{"title":"Who’s asking? Social platform and research sponsors’ identity biases in guests’ hospitality experience-reviews: a case study of Spanish hotels","authors":"Arch G Woodside, Pedro Mir-Bernal, Teresa Sabada Garraza, Patricia San Miguel","doi":"10.1080/19368623.2023.2244467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>ABSTRACT</b></p><p>The study here assesses the systematic variability of service performance assessments in customer reviews placed in alternative online social media platforms in the travel industry as well as responses to the firm’s requests for customer evaluations. The research includes an empirical study conducted by a national (Spanish) hotel chain of nine corporately-owned properties (hotels). Data-analyses were performed of data collected for the nine hotels from TripAdvisor and Booking.com, as well as internal data from the hotel chain’s customer data files. The findings support the general conclusion that hotel reviews on different social media platforms vary in systematic ways. TripAdvisor reviews consistently include the largest share of detractors across all social media platforms in this study, ranging from 11 to 51%. This study contributes useful benchmarks for the relative differences in performances in customer experience assessments across different social media platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":47995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management","volume":"74 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2023.2244467","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The study here assesses the systematic variability of service performance assessments in customer reviews placed in alternative online social media platforms in the travel industry as well as responses to the firm’s requests for customer evaluations. The research includes an empirical study conducted by a national (Spanish) hotel chain of nine corporately-owned properties (hotels). Data-analyses were performed of data collected for the nine hotels from TripAdvisor and Booking.com, as well as internal data from the hotel chain’s customer data files. The findings support the general conclusion that hotel reviews on different social media platforms vary in systematic ways. TripAdvisor reviews consistently include the largest share of detractors across all social media platforms in this study, ranging from 11 to 51%. This study contributes useful benchmarks for the relative differences in performances in customer experience assessments across different social media platforms.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
问是谁?社交平台和研究赞助商在客人酒店体验评论中的身份偏见:以西班牙酒店为例
摘要本研究评估了在旅游行业的其他在线社交媒体平台上的客户评论中服务绩效评估的系统可变性,以及对公司客户评估请求的回应。本研究包括一个由九家企业所有的酒店(酒店)组成的国家(西班牙)连锁酒店进行的实证研究。对从TripAdvisor和Booking.com收集的九家酒店的数据进行了数据分析,并从连锁酒店的客户数据文件中收集了内部数据。这些发现支持了一个总体结论,即不同社交媒体平台上的酒店评论存在系统性差异。在这项研究中,在所有社交媒体平台上,猫途鹰的评论中,诋毁者所占的比例一直最大,从11%到51%不等。本研究为不同社交媒体平台上客户体验评估的相对差异提供了有用的基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management serves as a peer-reviewed platform dedicated to advancing understanding, practice, and education in hospitality marketing and management. It strives to foster the development of knowledge and theory by promoting new ideas, models, approaches, and paradigms. Embracing a multifaceted approach that spans administrative disciplines, liberal arts, and social sciences, the journal disseminates knowledge through high-quality, peer-reviewed research papers, reports, and book reviews. It stands as a unique forum for the community of students, academics, and practitioners who share a common interest and commitment to the field of hospitality marketing and management.
期刊最新文献
Reexamination of consumers’ willingness to stay at green hotels: rethinking the role of social identity theory, value-belief-norm theory, and theory of planned behavior When leader’s workaholism meets the dark triad: understanding employee zero-sum mindset and resilience in relation to retention The role of technology in users’ wellbeing: Conceptualizing digital wellbeing in hospitality and future research directions Guest interaction with hotel booking website information: scale development and validation of antecedents and consequences Effect of online review comment recency on information processing: interaction between overall and recently posted individual ratings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1