A conceptual model of feedback mechanisms in adjusted affordances – Insights from usage of a mental mobile health application

IF 27 1区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE International Journal of Information Management Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102597
Christian Meske , Ireti Amojo , Devinder Thapa
{"title":"A conceptual model of feedback mechanisms in adjusted affordances – Insights from usage of a mental mobile health application","authors":"Christian Meske ,&nbsp;Ireti Amojo ,&nbsp;Devinder Thapa","doi":"10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Affordance theory provides one of the most prominent lenses through which the socio-technical aspects of a system’s use can be investigated and understood. In this context, the literature has proposed that perceived and actualized affordances may be adjusted over time. Yet, how the adjustment of affordances occurs has not been explained in detail. Thus, in this article, we develop a conceptual model of feedback mechanisms that includes a more explicit description of how affordances are perceived by users, whether actualized and adjusted. With the model, we introduce the central concept of a <em>generative base</em>, out of which affordance perceptions emerge and which can be updated through affordance actualizations. With this base, we integrate mental model (MM) theory to explain better the differing perceptions before and after actor–artifact interactions. Our conceptual model is illustrated and specified using an empirical case of the mental mobile health (mHealth) app “Between The Lines” in Germany. In this study, we conducted 40 interviews in two rounds with 20 teenage app users. Our results show that the users’ perceptions of mHealth affordances become adjusted and hence change over time due to experiencing the actualization process, which may lead to an update of the generative base, including the user’s MM.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48422,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information Management","volume":"69 ","pages":"Article 102597"},"PeriodicalIF":27.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401222001311","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Affordance theory provides one of the most prominent lenses through which the socio-technical aspects of a system’s use can be investigated and understood. In this context, the literature has proposed that perceived and actualized affordances may be adjusted over time. Yet, how the adjustment of affordances occurs has not been explained in detail. Thus, in this article, we develop a conceptual model of feedback mechanisms that includes a more explicit description of how affordances are perceived by users, whether actualized and adjusted. With the model, we introduce the central concept of a generative base, out of which affordance perceptions emerge and which can be updated through affordance actualizations. With this base, we integrate mental model (MM) theory to explain better the differing perceptions before and after actor–artifact interactions. Our conceptual model is illustrated and specified using an empirical case of the mental mobile health (mHealth) app “Between The Lines” in Germany. In this study, we conducted 40 interviews in two rounds with 20 teenage app users. Our results show that the users’ perceptions of mHealth affordances become adjusted and hence change over time due to experiencing the actualization process, which may lead to an update of the generative base, including the user’s MM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调整可供性中反馈机制的概念模型——来自心理移动健康应用程序使用的见解
负担能力理论提供了一个最突出的视角,通过它可以调查和理解系统使用的社会技术方面。在这种背景下,文献提出,感知和实现的可供性可能会随着时间的推移而调整。然而,可供性的调整是如何发生的还没有详细解释。因此,在本文中,我们开发了一个反馈机制的概念模型,其中包括对用户如何感知可供性的更明确的描述,无论是实现的还是调整的。通过该模型,我们引入了生成基础的核心概念,可供性感知从生成基础中产生,并可以通过可供性实现来更新。在此基础上,我们整合了心理模型(MM)理论,以更好地解释演员-工件交互前后的不同感知。我们的概念模型是通过德国心理移动健康(mHealth)应用程序“Between the Lines”的实证案例来说明和具体说明的。在这项研究中,我们对20名青少年应用程序用户进行了两轮40次采访。我们的研究结果表明,由于经历了实现过程,用户对mHealth可供性的感知会随着时间的推移而发生调整,从而发生变化,这可能会导致生成基础的更新,包括用户的MM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Information Management
International Journal of Information Management INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
53.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
111
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Information Management (IJIM) is a distinguished, international, and peer-reviewed journal dedicated to providing its readers with top-notch analysis and discussions within the evolving field of information management. Key features of the journal include: Comprehensive Coverage: IJIM keeps readers informed with major papers, reports, and reviews. Topical Relevance: The journal remains current and relevant through Viewpoint articles and regular features like Research Notes, Case Studies, and a Reviews section, ensuring readers are updated on contemporary issues. Focus on Quality: IJIM prioritizes high-quality papers that address contemporary issues in information management.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing supply chain resilience: A fit mechanism between key core technology innovations and digital technology applications Configuring trust in AI-augmented healthcare: The role of AI interpretability and data privacy in patient adoption of AI-assisted diagnosis Editorial Board Seeking help from AI: Understanding patient use of intelligent guidance applications The impact of enterprise and public social media use on guanxi formation and task performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1