Beyond effective use: Integrating wise reasoning in machine learning development

IF 20.1 1区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE International Journal of Information Management Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102566
Morteza Namvar, Ali Intezari, Saeed Akhlaghpour, Justin P. Brienza
{"title":"Beyond effective use: Integrating wise reasoning in machine learning development","authors":"Morteza Namvar,&nbsp;Ali Intezari,&nbsp;Saeed Akhlaghpour,&nbsp;Justin P. Brienza","doi":"10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The introduction of machine learning (ML), as the engine of many artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled systems in organizations, comes with the claim that ML models provide automated decisions or help domain experts improve their decision-making. Such a claim gives rise to the need to keep domain experts in the loop. Hence, data scientists, as those who develop ML models and infuse them with human intelligence during ML development, interact with various ML stakeholders and reflect their views within ML models. This interaction comes with (often conflicting) demands from various ML stakeholders and potential tensions. Building on the theories of effective use and wise reasoning, this mixed method study proposes a model to better understand how data scientists can use wisdom for managing these tensions when they develop ML models. In Study 1, through interviewing 41 analytics and ML experts, we investigate the dimensions of wise reasoning in the context of ML development. In Study 2, we test the overall model using a sample of 249 data scientists. Our results confirm that to develop effective ML models, data scientists need to not only use ML systems effectively, but also practice wise reasoning in their interactions with domain experts. We discuss the implications of these findings for research and practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48422,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information Management","volume":"69 ","pages":"Article 102566"},"PeriodicalIF":20.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401222001001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The introduction of machine learning (ML), as the engine of many artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled systems in organizations, comes with the claim that ML models provide automated decisions or help domain experts improve their decision-making. Such a claim gives rise to the need to keep domain experts in the loop. Hence, data scientists, as those who develop ML models and infuse them with human intelligence during ML development, interact with various ML stakeholders and reflect their views within ML models. This interaction comes with (often conflicting) demands from various ML stakeholders and potential tensions. Building on the theories of effective use and wise reasoning, this mixed method study proposes a model to better understand how data scientists can use wisdom for managing these tensions when they develop ML models. In Study 1, through interviewing 41 analytics and ML experts, we investigate the dimensions of wise reasoning in the context of ML development. In Study 2, we test the overall model using a sample of 249 data scientists. Our results confirm that to develop effective ML models, data scientists need to not only use ML systems effectively, but also practice wise reasoning in their interactions with domain experts. We discuss the implications of these findings for research and practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越有效使用:在机器学习开发中集成明智的推理
机器学习(ML)作为组织中许多人工智能(AI)系统的引擎,其引入声称ML模型提供自动化决策或帮助领域专家改进决策。这样的说法引发了让领域专家了解情况的必要性。因此,数据科学家,作为开发ML模型并在ML开发过程中为其注入人类智慧的人,与各种ML利益相关者互动,并在ML模型中反映他们的观点。这种互动伴随着各种ML利益相关者的需求(通常是相互冲突的)和潜在的紧张关系。基于有效使用和明智推理的理论,这项混合方法研究提出了一个模型,以更好地了解数据科学家在开发ML模型时如何利用智慧来管理这些紧张关系。在研究1中,通过采访41位分析和ML专家,我们研究了ML开发背景下明智推理的维度。在研究2中,我们使用249名数据科学家的样本来测试整个模型。我们的研究结果证实,要开发有效的ML模型,数据科学家不仅需要有效地使用ML系统,还需要在与领域专家的互动中实践明智的推理。我们讨论了这些发现对研究和实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Information Management
International Journal of Information Management INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
53.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
111
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Information Management (IJIM) is a distinguished, international, and peer-reviewed journal dedicated to providing its readers with top-notch analysis and discussions within the evolving field of information management. Key features of the journal include: Comprehensive Coverage: IJIM keeps readers informed with major papers, reports, and reviews. Topical Relevance: The journal remains current and relevant through Viewpoint articles and regular features like Research Notes, Case Studies, and a Reviews section, ensuring readers are updated on contemporary issues. Focus on Quality: IJIM prioritizes high-quality papers that address contemporary issues in information management.
期刊最新文献
Collaborative AI in the workplace: Enhancing organizational performance through resource-based and task-technology fit perspectives Personal data strategies in digital advertising: Can first-party data outshine third-party data? Using the influence of human-as-machine representation for self-improvement products The exploration of users’ perceived value from personalization and virtual conversational agents to enable a smart home assemblage– A mixed method approach Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology for sustainable technologies context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1