Sensory substitution can improve decision-making

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in Human Behavior Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107797
Heinrich Peters, Sandra C. Matz, Moran Cerf
{"title":"Sensory substitution can improve decision-making","authors":"Heinrich Peters,&nbsp;Sandra C. Matz,&nbsp;Moran Cerf","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2023.107797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>New technologies are often considered direct competitors to humans in the realm of decision-making. This paper explores a novel approach to augmenting human decision-making through technology. Specifically, drawing on the brain's unique ability to learn from sensory experiences, we introduce <span><em>sensory substitution</em></span><span><span>, the encoding of information in an alternative sensory modality, as a method to improve decision-making. In a within-subject design (N = 48), we show that translating numerical information into sensory experiences (i.e., </span>tactile stimulation administered to a person's body) results in higher decision accuracy in a multiple-cue learning task. Response time analyses, participants' self-reports, and cognitive modeling all suggest that the benefits afforded by sensory substitution are the result of a shift from explicit rule abstraction to configural learning. That is, rather than deliberately inferring decision rules, participants develop intuitive, perceptual strategies to accurately predict outcomes. Together, our findings suggest that sensory substitution could enhance decision-making by training “gut instincts” rather than deliberate decision-making skills.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 107797"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563223001486","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

New technologies are often considered direct competitors to humans in the realm of decision-making. This paper explores a novel approach to augmenting human decision-making through technology. Specifically, drawing on the brain's unique ability to learn from sensory experiences, we introduce sensory substitution, the encoding of information in an alternative sensory modality, as a method to improve decision-making. In a within-subject design (N = 48), we show that translating numerical information into sensory experiences (i.e., tactile stimulation administered to a person's body) results in higher decision accuracy in a multiple-cue learning task. Response time analyses, participants' self-reports, and cognitive modeling all suggest that the benefits afforded by sensory substitution are the result of a shift from explicit rule abstraction to configural learning. That is, rather than deliberately inferring decision rules, participants develop intuitive, perceptual strategies to accurately predict outcomes. Together, our findings suggest that sensory substitution could enhance decision-making by training “gut instincts” rather than deliberate decision-making skills.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感官替代可以改善决策
在决策领域,新技术通常被认为是人类的直接竞争对手。本文探讨了一种通过技术增强人类决策能力的新方法。具体来说,利用大脑从感官体验中学习的独特能力,我们引入了感官替代,即以另一种感官模式编码信息,作为改进决策的方法。在受试者内部设计(N=48)中,我们表明,将数字信息转化为感官体验(即对人的身体进行的触觉刺激)会在多线索学习任务中产生更高的决策准确性。反应时间分析、参与者的自我报告和认知建模都表明,感觉替代所带来的好处是从显性规则抽象向结构学习转变的结果。也就是说,参与者不是故意推断决策规则,而是制定直观、感性的策略来准确预测结果。总之,我们的研究结果表明,感官替代可以通过训练“直觉”而不是深思熟虑的决策技能来增强决策能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
期刊最新文献
What makes an app authentic? Determining antecedents of perceived authenticity in an AI-powered service app The effects of self-explanation on game-based learning: Evidence from eye-tracking analyses Avatars at risk: Exploring public response to sexual violence in immersive digital spaces Perception of non-binary social media users towards authentic non-binary social media influencers Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1