Diagnostic value of the neutrophil lymphocyte ratio in discrimination between tuberculosis and bacterial community acquired pneumonia: A meta-analysis

Horieh Shojaan , Niusha Kalami , Masoumeh Ghasempour Alamdari , Seyed Matin Emami Alorizy , Arshin Ghaedi , Aida Bazrgar , Monireh Khanzadeh , Brandon Lucke-Wold , Shokoufeh Khanzadeh
{"title":"Diagnostic value of the neutrophil lymphocyte ratio in discrimination between tuberculosis and bacterial community acquired pneumonia: A meta-analysis","authors":"Horieh Shojaan ,&nbsp;Niusha Kalami ,&nbsp;Masoumeh Ghasempour Alamdari ,&nbsp;Seyed Matin Emami Alorizy ,&nbsp;Arshin Ghaedi ,&nbsp;Aida Bazrgar ,&nbsp;Monireh Khanzadeh ,&nbsp;Brandon Lucke-Wold ,&nbsp;Shokoufeh Khanzadeh","doi":"10.1016/j.jctube.2023.100395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>We conducted a systematic review and <em>meta</em>-analysis, based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, to evaluate current literature on diagnostic value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in discrimination between tuberculosis (TB) and bacterial community acquired pneumonia (B-CAP).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Literature search was conducted from July 20, 2023 using<!--> <!-->Scopus, PubMed,<!--> <!-->and Web of Science databases. STATA software (version 12.0; Stata Corporation) was used for all analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We found that patients with TB had significantly lower levels of NLR compared to those with B-CAP (SMD = −1.09, 95 %CI = −1.78- −0.40, P = 0.002). In the quality subgroup analysis, we found that patients with TB had significantly lower level of NLR compared to those with B-CAP consistent in moderate (SMD = -0.86, 95 %CI = −2.30, 0.57, P = 0.23) and high-quality studies (SMD = -1.25, 95 %CI = -2.07, −0.42). In the subgroup analysis based on continent, we found that patients with TB had significantly lower level of NLR compared to those with B-CAP in studies performed in Asian populations (SMD = -1.37, 95 %CI = −2.13, −0.61, P &lt; 0.001), but not on African population (SMD = -0.02, 95 %CI = −1.06, 1.02, P = 0.97). The result of this study did not change after execution of sensitivity analysis. The pooled sensitivity of NLR was 0.86 (95% CI = 0.80, 0.91), and the pooled specificity was0.88 (95% CI = 0.69, 0.95).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients with TB had a significantly lower NLR levels compared to those with B-CAP, so we utilized this biomarker for distinguishing between the disorders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 100395"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405579423000517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, to evaluate current literature on diagnostic value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in discrimination between tuberculosis (TB) and bacterial community acquired pneumonia (B-CAP).

Methods

Literature search was conducted from July 20, 2023 using Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases. STATA software (version 12.0; Stata Corporation) was used for all analyses.

Results

We found that patients with TB had significantly lower levels of NLR compared to those with B-CAP (SMD = −1.09, 95 %CI = −1.78- −0.40, P = 0.002). In the quality subgroup analysis, we found that patients with TB had significantly lower level of NLR compared to those with B-CAP consistent in moderate (SMD = -0.86, 95 %CI = −2.30, 0.57, P = 0.23) and high-quality studies (SMD = -1.25, 95 %CI = -2.07, −0.42). In the subgroup analysis based on continent, we found that patients with TB had significantly lower level of NLR compared to those with B-CAP in studies performed in Asian populations (SMD = -1.37, 95 %CI = −2.13, −0.61, P < 0.001), but not on African population (SMD = -0.02, 95 %CI = −1.06, 1.02, P = 0.97). The result of this study did not change after execution of sensitivity analysis. The pooled sensitivity of NLR was 0.86 (95% CI = 0.80, 0.91), and the pooled specificity was0.88 (95% CI = 0.69, 0.95).

Conclusion

Patients with TB had a significantly lower NLR levels compared to those with B-CAP, so we utilized this biomarker for distinguishing between the disorders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值在区分肺结核和细菌性社区获得性肺炎中的诊断价值:一项荟萃分析
背景我们根据系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行了系统评价和元分析,以评估中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)在区分结核病(TB)和细菌性社区获得性肺炎(B-CAP)中的诊断价值,2023使用Scopus、PubMed和Web of Science数据库。STATA软件(12.0版;STATA Corporation)用于所有分析。结果与B-CAP患者相比,TB患者的NLR水平显著降低(SMD=−1.09,95%CI=-1.78-−0.40,P=0.002),我们发现,与B-CAP患者相比,TB患者的NLR水平显著较低,这些患者在中度(SMD=-0.86,95%CI=-2.30,0.57,P=0.023)和高质量研究(SMD=-1.25,95%CI=2.07,-0.42)中表现一致。在基于大陆的亚组分析中,我们发现,在亚洲人群中进行的研究中,结核病患者的NLR水平明显低于B-CAP患者(SMD=-1.37,95%CI=-2.13,-0.61,P<;0.001),但在非洲人群中没有(SMD=-0.02,95%CI=-1.06,1.02,P=0.97)。在进行敏感性分析后,这项研究的结果没有改变。NLR的合并敏感性为0.86(95%CI=0.80,0.91),合并特异性为0.88(95%CI=0.69,0.95)。结论与B-CAP患者相比,结核病患者的NLR水平显著较低,因此我们利用该生物标志物来区分疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases
Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Mycobacterial Diseases aims to provide a forum for clinically relevant articles on all aspects of tuberculosis and other mycobacterial infections, including (but not limited to) epidemiology, clinical investigation, transmission, diagnosis, treatment, drug-resistance and public policy, and encourages the submission of clinical studies, thematic reviews and case reports. Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Mycobacterial Diseases is an Open Access publication.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of nutritional support in combination with standard Buruli ulcer treatment: A case study in Côte d’Ivoire Computational investigation of the global prevalence of multidrug resistant Mycobacterium leprae: A systematic review and meta-analysis Endogenous reactivation cases identified by whole genome sequencing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Exploration of possible causes in Latvian tuberculosis patients Bovine tuberculosis reactor cattle in Southwest Ethiopia: Risk factors for bovine tuberculosis Rapidly growing knowledge of Mycobacterium smegmatis: A case series and review of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1