Sample size selection for discrete choice experiments using design features

IF 2.8 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Choice Modelling Pub Date : 2023-09-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jocm.2023.100436
Samson Yaekob Assele , Michel Meulders , Martina Vandebroek
{"title":"Sample size selection for discrete choice experiments using design features","authors":"Samson Yaekob Assele ,&nbsp;Michel Meulders ,&nbsp;Martina Vandebroek","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2023.100436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In discrete choice experiment (DCE) studies, selecting the appropriate sample size remains a challenge. The question of the required sample size for a DCE is addressed in the literature in two distinct approaches: a rule-of-thumb approach and an approach based on the statistical error of the parameter of interest. The former is less accurate and does not depend on the desired power and significance level, whereas the latter requires knowing the complete design which may not be known at the planning stage. This paper proposes a new rule of thumb as well as a new regression-based method that requires knowing certain design characteristics rather than the complete design and takes into account the power and significance level. We compare the sample size estimated using the proposed methods with the true required sample size based on the statistical error of the parameter of interest and the approximations given by the existing rules of thumb. The results show that both the new rule of thumb and the regression-based approach improve the magnitude and proportion of underestimation compared to the most commonly used rule of thumb of Orme. Though the proposed approaches perform in general similarly to Tang’s rule which improves Orme’s rule, they seem to do better for large settings in terms of the number of choice sets and the number of alternatives per choice set in reducing underestimation. Moreover, we have demonstrated the possibility to adapt the regression-based approaches to take into account other scenarios and choice set complexity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46863,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Choice Modelling","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 100436"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Choice Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755534523000374","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In discrete choice experiment (DCE) studies, selecting the appropriate sample size remains a challenge. The question of the required sample size for a DCE is addressed in the literature in two distinct approaches: a rule-of-thumb approach and an approach based on the statistical error of the parameter of interest. The former is less accurate and does not depend on the desired power and significance level, whereas the latter requires knowing the complete design which may not be known at the planning stage. This paper proposes a new rule of thumb as well as a new regression-based method that requires knowing certain design characteristics rather than the complete design and takes into account the power and significance level. We compare the sample size estimated using the proposed methods with the true required sample size based on the statistical error of the parameter of interest and the approximations given by the existing rules of thumb. The results show that both the new rule of thumb and the regression-based approach improve the magnitude and proportion of underestimation compared to the most commonly used rule of thumb of Orme. Though the proposed approaches perform in general similarly to Tang’s rule which improves Orme’s rule, they seem to do better for large settings in terms of the number of choice sets and the number of alternatives per choice set in reducing underestimation. Moreover, we have demonstrated the possibility to adapt the regression-based approaches to take into account other scenarios and choice set complexity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用设计特征进行离散选择实验的样本量选择
在离散选择实验(DCE)研究中,选择合适的样本量仍然是一个挑战。文献中用两种不同的方法解决了DCE所需的样本量问题:经验法则方法和基于感兴趣参数统计误差的方法。前者不太准确,不取决于所需的功率和重要性水平,而后者需要了解完整的设计,而这在规划阶段可能是未知的。本文提出了一个新的经验法则和一种新的基于回归的方法,该方法需要了解某些设计特征,而不是完整的设计,并考虑到功率和显著性水平。我们将使用所提出的方法估计的样本量与基于感兴趣参数的统计误差和现有经验法则给出的近似值的真实所需样本量进行比较。结果表明,与最常用的奥姆经验法则相比,新的经验法则和基于回归的方法都提高了低估的幅度和比例。尽管所提出的方法总体上与改进了Orme规则的Tang规则类似,但就选择集的数量和每个选择集的备选方案数量而言,它们似乎在减少低估方面对大型设置做得更好。此外,我们已经证明了调整基于回归的方法以考虑其他场景和选择集复杂性的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Latent class choice models with an error structure: Investigating potential unobserved associations between latent segmentation and behavior generation Model choice and framing effects: Do discrete choice modeling decisions affect loss aversion estimates? A consistent moment equations for binary probit models with endogenous variables using instrumental variables Transformation-based flexible error structures for choice modeling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1