Trusting clean energy: novel perspectives on transition pathways for coal phaseouts and clean electrification phase-ins

Q1 Social Sciences Electricity Journal Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tej.2023.107318
David O. Jermain , Raymond C. Pilcher
{"title":"Trusting clean energy: novel perspectives on transition pathways for coal phaseouts and clean electrification phase-ins","authors":"David O. Jermain ,&nbsp;Raymond C. Pilcher","doi":"10.1016/j.tej.2023.107318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Institutional barriers contribute to the ambivalent performance of energy decarbonization efforts. Unexpected increases in demand for coal, driven by war in Europe, coupled with new and growing Asia-based investment in coal mines and power plants prove the need for novel coal transition pathways. At the same time, the UN aims to electrify communities with little or no access to clean and affordable energy. This work, in part, serves to support the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The 2030 Agenda is seventeen sustainable development goals (SDGs). The sum of the goals is about improving environments and communities. And for communities, goals focus on improving living and working conditions. SDG 7 concerns provisioning clean and affordable energy and technology. Trust structures, which provide sources of funding and governance systems, are an underutilized means of supporting coal transitions. Also, they could be equally effective if used to electrify communities with little or no access to electricity. A Trust providing a globalized \"social security\" solution can strengthen coal transitions. A Trust that speeds the deployment of electricity to areas with little or no access uses an old-line model. Early 20th century electric utilities developed using a \"virtuous circle\" transaction through which investment in communities and their economic development grew electricity sales. Two novel Trust models offered in this work overlap on coal transitions. Also, they offer pragmatic ways to help decarbonize the world. That is, the models may be applicable in other economic sectors. Using novel Trust models can improve the quality of human lives through clean energy transitions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35642,"journal":{"name":"Electricity Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electricity Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040619023000854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Institutional barriers contribute to the ambivalent performance of energy decarbonization efforts. Unexpected increases in demand for coal, driven by war in Europe, coupled with new and growing Asia-based investment in coal mines and power plants prove the need for novel coal transition pathways. At the same time, the UN aims to electrify communities with little or no access to clean and affordable energy. This work, in part, serves to support the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The 2030 Agenda is seventeen sustainable development goals (SDGs). The sum of the goals is about improving environments and communities. And for communities, goals focus on improving living and working conditions. SDG 7 concerns provisioning clean and affordable energy and technology. Trust structures, which provide sources of funding and governance systems, are an underutilized means of supporting coal transitions. Also, they could be equally effective if used to electrify communities with little or no access to electricity. A Trust providing a globalized "social security" solution can strengthen coal transitions. A Trust that speeds the deployment of electricity to areas with little or no access uses an old-line model. Early 20th century electric utilities developed using a "virtuous circle" transaction through which investment in communities and their economic development grew electricity sales. Two novel Trust models offered in this work overlap on coal transitions. Also, they offer pragmatic ways to help decarbonize the world. That is, the models may be applicable in other economic sectors. Using novel Trust models can improve the quality of human lives through clean energy transitions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信任清洁能源:煤炭淘汰和清洁电气化阶段过渡路径的新视角
体制障碍导致能源脱碳努力的矛盾表现。欧洲战争导致的煤炭需求意外增长,加上亚洲对煤矿和发电厂的新投资和不断增长,证明需要新的煤炭转型途径。与此同时,联合国的目标是为那些很少或根本无法获得清洁和负担得起的能源的社区供电。这项工作在一定程度上有助于支持联合国2030年可持续发展议程。《2030年议程》是十七项可持续发展目标。这些目标的总和是关于改善环境和社区。对于社区来说,目标集中在改善生活和工作条件上。可持续发展目标7涉及提供清洁和负担得起的能源和技术。信托结构提供资金来源和治理系统,是支持煤炭转型的一种未充分利用的手段。此外,如果用于为几乎没有或根本没有电力供应的社区供电,它们也同样有效。提供全球化“社会保障”解决方案的信托基金可以加强煤炭转型。一个加快向几乎没有或根本没有电力接入的地区部署电力的信托基金使用了旧的线路模式。20世纪初,电力公司利用“良性循环”交易发展起来,通过这种交易,对社区的投资及其经济发展增加了电力销售。这项工作中提供的两个新的信任模型在煤炭转型方面重叠。此外,它们还提供了帮助世界脱碳的务实方法。也就是说,这些模型可能适用于其他经济部门。使用新的信任模型可以通过清洁能源转型提高人类生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Electricity Journal
Electricity Journal Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: The Electricity Journal is the leading journal in electric power policy. The journal deals primarily with fuel diversity and the energy mix needed for optimal energy market performance, and therefore covers the full spectrum of energy, from coal, nuclear, natural gas and oil, to renewable energy sources including hydro, solar, geothermal and wind power. Recently, the journal has been publishing in emerging areas including energy storage, microgrid strategies, dynamic pricing, cyber security, climate change, cap and trade, distributed generation, net metering, transmission and generation market dynamics. The Electricity Journal aims to bring together the most thoughtful and influential thinkers globally from across industry, practitioners, government, policymakers and academia. The Editorial Advisory Board is comprised of electric industry thought leaders who have served as regulators, consultants, litigators, and market advocates. Their collective experience helps ensure that the most relevant and thought-provoking issues are presented to our readers, and helps navigate the emerging shape and design of the electricity/energy industry.
期刊最新文献
Critical infrastructure organisational resilience assessment: A case study of Malawi’s power grid operator The role of political parties in the public perception of nuclear energy The political economy of electricity market coupling: Comparing experiences from Europe and the United States Residential electricity efficiency and implications for Vietnam's clean energy transition With uncertainty comes opportunity: Repurposing coal assets to create new beginnings in the U.S.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1