Grand strategy and public diplomacy: A case study on China’s Belt and Road Initiative and its reception in the Australian press

IF 4.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Public Relations Review Pub Date : 2023-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102384
Mitchell John Hobbs , Jolynna Sinanan , Mei Li
{"title":"Grand strategy and public diplomacy: A case study on China’s Belt and Road Initiative and its reception in the Australian press","authors":"Mitchell John Hobbs ,&nbsp;Jolynna Sinanan ,&nbsp;Mei Li","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article examines China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) as a public diplomacy grand strategy at the macro-level of inter-state relations. It does so from the perspective of Australia, where the Andrews Labor government in the state of Victoria was, for a period, a signatory to the program. Specifically, this study uses content analysis to consider the reception of the BRI in the Australian press and the complex interactions of news values and ideologies that influenced its representation. This study shows that the effectiveness of the BRI as a grand strategy was undermined by the two interacting news cultures dominating media coverage in Australia, one of which stems from the liberal traditions of the press and the other from the conservative ideological proclivities of the Executive Chair of News Corp, Rupert Murdoch. In so doing, this study contributes to research on the different communication strategies mobilized by states in their geopolitical wrangling, as well as how contextual variables can pre-determine the success or failure of specific public diplomacy campaigns.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":"49 5","pages":"Article 102384"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Relations Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811123000991","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) as a public diplomacy grand strategy at the macro-level of inter-state relations. It does so from the perspective of Australia, where the Andrews Labor government in the state of Victoria was, for a period, a signatory to the program. Specifically, this study uses content analysis to consider the reception of the BRI in the Australian press and the complex interactions of news values and ideologies that influenced its representation. This study shows that the effectiveness of the BRI as a grand strategy was undermined by the two interacting news cultures dominating media coverage in Australia, one of which stems from the liberal traditions of the press and the other from the conservative ideological proclivities of the Executive Chair of News Corp, Rupert Murdoch. In so doing, this study contributes to research on the different communication strategies mobilized by states in their geopolitical wrangling, as well as how contextual variables can pre-determine the success or failure of specific public diplomacy campaigns.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大战略与公共外交——以中国“一带一路”倡议倡议及其在澳大利亚新闻界的反响为例
本文将“一带一路”倡议倡议作为一项国家间关系宏观层面的公共外交大战略来审视。它是从澳大利亚的角度出发的,维多利亚州的安德鲁斯工党政府曾一度是该计划的签署国。具体而言,本研究使用内容分析来考虑澳大利亚媒体对“一带一路”倡议的接受程度,以及影响其代表性的新闻价值观和意识形态的复杂互动。这项研究表明,“一带一路”倡议作为一项大战略的有效性受到了澳大利亚媒体报道中两种相互影响的新闻文化的破坏,其中一种文化源于新闻界的自由主义传统,另一种则源于新闻集团执行主席鲁珀特·默多克的保守意识形态倾向。通过这样做,这项研究有助于研究各国在地缘政治争论中动员的不同沟通策略,以及背景变量如何预先决定特定公共外交活动的成败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
19.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Public Relations Review is the oldest journal devoted to articles that examine public relations in depth, and commentaries by specialists in the field. Most of the articles are based on empirical research undertaken by professionals and academics in the field. In addition to research articles and commentaries, The Review publishes invited research in brief, and book reviews in the fields of public relations, mass communications, organizational communications, public opinion formations, social science research and evaluation, marketing, management and public policy formation.
期刊最新文献
“Being a Burson Person is something special”: Burson-Marsteller’s influence in the Americanization of the public relations industry in Latin America (1980s – 2010s) The effects of crisis type and CSR fit on organizational outcomes: The moderating role of authentic leadership in shaping organizational reputation, word-of-mouth, and purchase intentions Artificial intelligence for internal communication: Strategies, challenges, and implications Communicating strategic CEO activism to promote employee prosocial behaviors: Understanding the mediating role of employee prosocial sensemaking Optimizing organizational corrective communication: The effects of correction placement timing, refutation detail level, and corrective narrative type on combating crisis misinformation narratives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1