Measuring service quality with text analytics: Considering both importance and performance of consumer opinions on social and non-social online platforms

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114298
Lin Lu , Pei Xu , Yen-Yao Wang , Yu Wang
{"title":"Measuring service quality with text analytics: Considering both importance and performance of consumer opinions on social and non-social online platforms","authors":"Lin Lu ,&nbsp;Pei Xu ,&nbsp;Yen-Yao Wang ,&nbsp;Yu Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Online word-of-mouth (WOM) has attracted considerable attention from researchers due to its abundant information on customer perceptions that drive product and service improvement. This study develops a novel weighted service quality (WSQ) metric derived from online customer opinions, leveraging the importance-performance analysis framework. Data collected from social and non-social online platforms confirms that this WSQ approach outperforms the widely used average sentiment score approach and significantly predicts the industry service quality standard, Airline Quality Rating (AQR). In addition, the WSQ metric derived from social media proves to be a more vital indicator for AQR than that derived from a non-social online platform. A significant difference in topic distributions was also identified between consumer opinions from social media and non-social online platforms. Our study makes several crucial contributions to the service quality literature on employing online WOM using sentiment analysis and topic modeling techniques.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 114298"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296323006574","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online word-of-mouth (WOM) has attracted considerable attention from researchers due to its abundant information on customer perceptions that drive product and service improvement. This study develops a novel weighted service quality (WSQ) metric derived from online customer opinions, leveraging the importance-performance analysis framework. Data collected from social and non-social online platforms confirms that this WSQ approach outperforms the widely used average sentiment score approach and significantly predicts the industry service quality standard, Airline Quality Rating (AQR). In addition, the WSQ metric derived from social media proves to be a more vital indicator for AQR than that derived from a non-social online platform. A significant difference in topic distributions was also identified between consumer opinions from social media and non-social online platforms. Our study makes several crucial contributions to the service quality literature on employing online WOM using sentiment analysis and topic modeling techniques.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用文本分析衡量服务质量:考虑消费者意见在社交和非社交在线平台上的重要性和表现
网络口碑(WOM)因其丰富的客户感知信息而吸引了研究人员的极大关注,这些信息推动了产品和服务的改进。本研究利用重要性绩效分析框架,从在线客户意见中开发了一种新的加权服务质量(WSQ)指标。从社交和非社交在线平台收集的数据证实,这种WSQ方法优于广泛使用的平均情绪评分方法,并显著预测了行业服务质量标准——航空公司质量评级(AQR)。此外,社交媒体得出的WSQ指标被证明是AQR的一个比非社交在线平台得出的指标更重要的指标。社交媒体和非社交在线平台的消费者意见在主题分布上也存在显著差异。我们的研究使用情感分析和主题建模技术对使用在线口碑的服务质量文献做出了一些重要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Content dissimilarity and online review helpfulness: Contextual insights Editorial Board Preventing algorithm aversion: People are willing to use algorithms with a learning label Agility in marketing teams: An analysis of factors influencing the entry decision into a trendy social network Socio-politically silent brands: A double edged sword
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1