Corporate social purpose statements and employee perceptions about the CEO and the corporation: A large sample natural experiment

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2023-09-26 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114286
Theano Lianidou , Di Zhu
{"title":"Corporate social purpose statements and employee perceptions about the CEO and the corporation: A large sample natural experiment","authors":"Theano Lianidou ,&nbsp;Di Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>On August 19, 2019, about 200 CEOs of large U.S. corporations signed the “Purpose of a Corporation” statement announcing that their corporations will assume a greater social purpose and serve the interests not only of shareholders but also of employees, customers, suppliers, and communities. We use this statement as a natural experiment which allows us to examine the effects of such social purpose statements on employee perceptions about the CEO and the corporation. Our results show that corporate social purpose statements that directly involve employee interests positively affect employee perceptions about the CEO and, to a lesser extent, the corporation. Moreover, this positive impact is stronger when these statements are coupled with corresponding corporate actions and practices, i.e., actual investments in employees and employee-perceived benefits, including the perceived benefit of working from home. Finally, we discuss this study's research and practical implications and suggest interesting future research opportunities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 114286"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296323006458","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On August 19, 2019, about 200 CEOs of large U.S. corporations signed the “Purpose of a Corporation” statement announcing that their corporations will assume a greater social purpose and serve the interests not only of shareholders but also of employees, customers, suppliers, and communities. We use this statement as a natural experiment which allows us to examine the effects of such social purpose statements on employee perceptions about the CEO and the corporation. Our results show that corporate social purpose statements that directly involve employee interests positively affect employee perceptions about the CEO and, to a lesser extent, the corporation. Moreover, this positive impact is stronger when these statements are coupled with corresponding corporate actions and practices, i.e., actual investments in employees and employee-perceived benefits, including the perceived benefit of working from home. Finally, we discuss this study's research and practical implications and suggest interesting future research opportunities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业社会目标声明和员工对CEO和企业的看法:一个大样本自然实验
2019年8月19日,约200名美国大公司首席执行官签署了《公司宗旨》声明,宣布他们的公司将承担更大的社会宗旨,不仅为股东的利益服务,也为员工、客户、供应商和社区的利益服务。我们将这一声明作为一个自然实验,使我们能够研究这种社会目的声明对员工对首席执行官和公司的看法的影响。我们的研究结果表明,直接涉及员工利益的企业社会目的声明会积极影响员工对首席执行官的看法,在较小程度上也会影响企业。此外,当这些声明与相应的公司行动和实践相结合时,这种积极影响会更强,即对员工的实际投资和员工感知的利益,包括在家工作的感知利益。最后,我们讨论了本研究的研究和实际意义,并提出了有趣的未来研究机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Content dissimilarity and online review helpfulness: Contextual insights Editorial Board Preventing algorithm aversion: People are willing to use algorithms with a learning label Agility in marketing teams: An analysis of factors influencing the entry decision into a trendy social network Socio-politically silent brands: A double edged sword
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1