The benefits of focal resurfacing implants over articular cartilage grafting in the knee

Q4 Medicine Orthopaedics and Trauma Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.mporth.2023.03.003
Paul Jermin, Jill Mulrain, Nikhil Sharma
{"title":"The benefits of focal resurfacing implants over articular cartilage grafting in the knee","authors":"Paul Jermin,&nbsp;Jill Mulrain,&nbsp;Nikhil Sharma","doi":"10.1016/j.mporth.2023.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The surgical treatment of chondral and osteochondral defects within the knee is becoming increasingly more complex and challenging, with an ever-increasing selection of options available to the orthopaedic surgeon. Technological and innovative advancements often move at a greater pace than the associated clinical outcomes and research-based evidence. The treatment for these conditions is continually evolving and developing before it is possible to critically appraise the data on their success. These surgical treatments are either biological, where an attempt is made to regenerate the lost tissue, or non-biological, such as focal resurfacing, partial or </span>total arthroplasty. Each of these treatment modalities has their own merits and drawbacks. Focal resurfacings have been around for a few decades, and their aim is to be the best of both options. While still not part of mainstream practice within the UK, their evidence base is growing, and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence has issued a review on their use. This review aims to assess the options available for treating cartilage defects in the knee, with a focus on these novel focal resurfacing implants.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39547,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics and Trauma","volume":"37 3","pages":"Pages 154-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877132723000234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The surgical treatment of chondral and osteochondral defects within the knee is becoming increasingly more complex and challenging, with an ever-increasing selection of options available to the orthopaedic surgeon. Technological and innovative advancements often move at a greater pace than the associated clinical outcomes and research-based evidence. The treatment for these conditions is continually evolving and developing before it is possible to critically appraise the data on their success. These surgical treatments are either biological, where an attempt is made to regenerate the lost tissue, or non-biological, such as focal resurfacing, partial or total arthroplasty. Each of these treatment modalities has their own merits and drawbacks. Focal resurfacings have been around for a few decades, and their aim is to be the best of both options. While still not part of mainstream practice within the UK, their evidence base is growing, and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence has issued a review on their use. This review aims to assess the options available for treating cartilage defects in the knee, with a focus on these novel focal resurfacing implants.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局灶性表面置换植入物对膝关节软骨移植的益处
膝关节内软骨和骨软骨缺损的外科治疗正变得越来越复杂和具有挑战性,整形外科医生可以选择的选项越来越多。技术和创新的进步往往比相关的临床结果和基于研究的证据更快。在对这些疾病的成功数据进行批判性评估之前,这些疾病的治疗方法正在不断发展。这些手术治疗要么是生物治疗,试图再生丢失的组织,要么是非生物治疗,如局部表面置换、部分或全关节成形术。每种治疗方式都有其优点和缺点。焦点重新铺设已经存在了几十年,他们的目标是两种选择中最好的。虽然它们仍然不是英国主流实践的一部分,但它们的证据基础正在增长,国家健康与护理卓越研究所已经对它们的使用进行了审查。这篇综述旨在评估可用于治疗膝关节软骨缺损的选择,重点是这些新型的局灶性表面置换植入物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedics and Trauma
Orthopaedics and Trauma Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics and Trauma presents a unique collection of International review articles summarizing the current state of knowledge and research in orthopaedics. Each issue focuses on a specific topic, discussed in depth in a mini-symposium; other articles cover the areas of basic science, medicine, children/adults, trauma, imaging and historical review. There is also an annotation, self-assessment questions and a second opinion section. In this way the entire postgraduate syllabus will be covered in a 4-year cycle.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Editorial Board Trauma to the lower cervical spine (sub-axial or C3–C7) in adults Cauda equina syndrome Injuries of the thoracic spine and the thoracolumbar junction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1