Momentary associations between sedentary bouts, cognitive load and mood in daily life: An ambulatory assessment study

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.mhpa.2023.100540
Marco Giurgiu , Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer
{"title":"Momentary associations between sedentary bouts, cognitive load and mood in daily life: An ambulatory assessment study","authors":"Marco Giurgiu ,&nbsp;Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer","doi":"10.1016/j.mhpa.2023.100540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Empirical evidence points to sedentary behavior as a ubiquitous health-related risk factor. Given the increasing number of mental disorders, a growing body of studies now focuses on the relationship between sedentary behavior and mental health. However, momentary interactions between sedentary bouts, mood, and type of cognitive load in daily life are highly understudied.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>To investigate whether sedentary bouts influence mood, we conducted an Ambulatory Assessment study in the everyday life of 103 university students over 5 days. We continuously measured sedentary behavior via accelerometers and assessed mood and type of cognitive load up to six times each day on smartphone diaries. We employed multilevel modeling to analyze the within-person effects of sedentary behavior, and cognitive load on mood.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sedentary bouts (20-min intervals prior to each e-diary assessment) negatively influenced energetic arousal (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and valence (<em>p</em> = 0.023). Cognitive load (mentally active vs. mentally passive) influenced negatively energetic arousal (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and positively calmness (<em>p</em> = 0.031). Exploratory interaction analyses revealed significant differences between cognitive load and bouts of SB (interrupted vs. uninterrupted).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The negative association between sedentary behavior and two of three mood dimensions (i.e., valence and energetic arousal) suggests sedentary behavior is an important risk factor for mental health among healthy young adults. Additionally, the cognitive load, specifically the distinction between mentally active and mentally passive activities, is an important factor in shaping momentary mood. We strongly recommend reducing prolonged SB and recognizing the potential benefits of engaging in mentally active activities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755296623000388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Empirical evidence points to sedentary behavior as a ubiquitous health-related risk factor. Given the increasing number of mental disorders, a growing body of studies now focuses on the relationship between sedentary behavior and mental health. However, momentary interactions between sedentary bouts, mood, and type of cognitive load in daily life are highly understudied.

Methods

To investigate whether sedentary bouts influence mood, we conducted an Ambulatory Assessment study in the everyday life of 103 university students over 5 days. We continuously measured sedentary behavior via accelerometers and assessed mood and type of cognitive load up to six times each day on smartphone diaries. We employed multilevel modeling to analyze the within-person effects of sedentary behavior, and cognitive load on mood.

Results

Sedentary bouts (20-min intervals prior to each e-diary assessment) negatively influenced energetic arousal (p < 0.001) and valence (p = 0.023). Cognitive load (mentally active vs. mentally passive) influenced negatively energetic arousal (p < 0.001) and positively calmness (p = 0.031). Exploratory interaction analyses revealed significant differences between cognitive load and bouts of SB (interrupted vs. uninterrupted).

Conclusions

The negative association between sedentary behavior and two of three mood dimensions (i.e., valence and energetic arousal) suggests sedentary behavior is an important risk factor for mental health among healthy young adults. Additionally, the cognitive load, specifically the distinction between mentally active and mentally passive activities, is an important factor in shaping momentary mood. We strongly recommend reducing prolonged SB and recognizing the potential benefits of engaging in mentally active activities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日常生活中久坐不动、认知负荷和情绪之间的瞬时关联:一项动态评估研究
目的实证证据表明久坐行为是一种普遍存在的与健康相关的危险因素。鉴于精神障碍的数量不断增加,现在越来越多的研究关注久坐行为与心理健康之间的关系。然而,日常生活中久坐不动、情绪和认知负荷类型之间的短暂互动却被高度低估。方法为了研究久坐是否会影响情绪,我们对103名大学生的日常生活进行了为期5天的动态评估研究。我们通过加速度计连续测量久坐行为,并在智能手机日记中每天评估多达六次情绪和认知负荷类型。我们采用多层次模型来分析久坐行为和认知负荷对情绪的人内影响。结果久坐发作(每次电子日记评估前间隔20分钟)对能量唤起(p<0.001)和效价(p=0.023)产生负面影响。认知负荷(精神主动与精神被动)对能量唤醒(p<001)和平静(p=0.031)产生负面影响。探索性交互分析显示,认知负荷之间存在显著差异结论久坐行为与三个情绪维度中的两个维度(即效价和能量唤醒)之间的负相关表明,久坐行为是健康年轻人心理健康的重要风险因素。此外,认知负荷,特别是心理主动和心理被动活动之间的区别,是塑造瞬间情绪的重要因素。我们强烈建议减少长时间的SB,并认识到从事心理活动的潜在好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1