Impact of multiyear rate plans on power distributor productivity: Evidence from Alberta

Q1 Social Sciences Electricity Journal Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tej.2023.107288
Mark Newton Lowry, David A. Hovde, Rebecca Kavan, Matthew Makos
{"title":"Impact of multiyear rate plans on power distributor productivity: Evidence from Alberta","authors":"Mark Newton Lowry,&nbsp;David A. Hovde,&nbsp;Rebecca Kavan,&nbsp;Matthew Makos","doi":"10.1016/j.tej.2023.107288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Multiyear rate plans (“MRPs”) are an increasingly popular alternative to traditional utility ratemaking in North America. Rate cases are less frequent, and an attrition relief mechanism (“ARM”) escalates revenue between rate cases on some basis other than the utility’s contemporaneous cost growth. An approach to ARM design has developed in North America that is based on price and productivity indexing. Evidence filed in support of indexed ARMs frequently includes studies of the efficiency of subject utilities. Stronger utility performance incentives are a theoretical advantage of MRPs but few empirical studies have quantified this advantage. A proceeding in Alberta, where indexed ARMs are used, has yielded evidence that MRPs can accelerate utility productivity growth.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35642,"journal":{"name":"Electricity Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electricity Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040619023000556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiyear rate plans (“MRPs”) are an increasingly popular alternative to traditional utility ratemaking in North America. Rate cases are less frequent, and an attrition relief mechanism (“ARM”) escalates revenue between rate cases on some basis other than the utility’s contemporaneous cost growth. An approach to ARM design has developed in North America that is based on price and productivity indexing. Evidence filed in support of indexed ARMs frequently includes studies of the efficiency of subject utilities. Stronger utility performance incentives are a theoretical advantage of MRPs but few empirical studies have quantified this advantage. A proceeding in Alberta, where indexed ARMs are used, has yielded evidence that MRPs can accelerate utility productivity growth.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多年费率计划对配电网生产力的影响:来自阿尔伯塔省的证据
多年费率计划(“MRP”)是北美传统公用事业费率制定的一种越来越受欢迎的替代方案。费率案例的频率较低,自然减员机制(“ARM”)在不同于公用事业同期成本增长的基础上提高费率案例之间的收入。北美开发了一种基于价格和生产力指数的ARM设计方法。为支持编入索引的ARM而提交的证据通常包括对主题效用效率的研究。更强的效用绩效激励是MRP的一个理论优势,但很少有实证研究量化这一优势。阿尔伯塔省的一项研究表明,MRP可以加速公用事业生产率的增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Electricity Journal
Electricity Journal Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: The Electricity Journal is the leading journal in electric power policy. The journal deals primarily with fuel diversity and the energy mix needed for optimal energy market performance, and therefore covers the full spectrum of energy, from coal, nuclear, natural gas and oil, to renewable energy sources including hydro, solar, geothermal and wind power. Recently, the journal has been publishing in emerging areas including energy storage, microgrid strategies, dynamic pricing, cyber security, climate change, cap and trade, distributed generation, net metering, transmission and generation market dynamics. The Electricity Journal aims to bring together the most thoughtful and influential thinkers globally from across industry, practitioners, government, policymakers and academia. The Editorial Advisory Board is comprised of electric industry thought leaders who have served as regulators, consultants, litigators, and market advocates. Their collective experience helps ensure that the most relevant and thought-provoking issues are presented to our readers, and helps navigate the emerging shape and design of the electricity/energy industry.
期刊最新文献
Critical infrastructure organisational resilience assessment: A case study of Malawi’s power grid operator The role of political parties in the public perception of nuclear energy The political economy of electricity market coupling: Comparing experiences from Europe and the United States Residential electricity efficiency and implications for Vietnam's clean energy transition With uncertainty comes opportunity: Repurposing coal assets to create new beginnings in the U.S.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1