Hígor Lins da Costa , Marco Túlio Mendonça Diniz , Rafael Albuquerque Xavier , Larissa Silva Queiroz , Rubson Pinheiro Maia
{"title":"Quantitative assessment of the geomorphological heritage of the Pedra da Boca State Park's surroundings: Key geoheritage site in Northeast Brazil","authors":"Hígor Lins da Costa , Marco Túlio Mendonça Diniz , Rafael Albuquerque Xavier , Larissa Silva Queiroz , Rubson Pinheiro Maia","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgeop.2023.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present paper aims to present a quantitative evaluation of the sites of geomorphological interest in the surroundings of Pedra da Boca State Park, Northeast Brazil. The methodology used was based on the proposal and procedures of Diniz, Araújo, and das Chagas’ study in 2022, which considers scientific and aesthetic value as central to the definition of a geomorphosite. After the choice of the form and its due adaptations, the field stage was carried out, consisting of the application of the evaluation at the sites of interest. Thus, to classify a site as a geomorphosite, it is necessary to have a high scientific and/or aesthetic value in quantification. If it does not have a high value in these categories, but has some other potential, it can be considered a geomorphological site. As a result, the geomorphological sites that stood out the most were Pedra da Boca (Mouth Stone) State Park, Pedra da Macambira (Macambira Stone), Cânion do Macapá (Macapá Canyon), Porão do Macapá (Macapá Basement), Pedra do Chapéu (Hat Stone), Cânion da Serra Verde (Serra Verde Canyon) and Peladas (Bare Rock), with only the latter not reaching the quantification needed to be considered a geomorphosite, thus constituting six geomorphosites and one geodiversity site.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36117,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks","volume":"11 3","pages":"Pages 433-449"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2577444123000497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The present paper aims to present a quantitative evaluation of the sites of geomorphological interest in the surroundings of Pedra da Boca State Park, Northeast Brazil. The methodology used was based on the proposal and procedures of Diniz, Araújo, and das Chagas’ study in 2022, which considers scientific and aesthetic value as central to the definition of a geomorphosite. After the choice of the form and its due adaptations, the field stage was carried out, consisting of the application of the evaluation at the sites of interest. Thus, to classify a site as a geomorphosite, it is necessary to have a high scientific and/or aesthetic value in quantification. If it does not have a high value in these categories, but has some other potential, it can be considered a geomorphological site. As a result, the geomorphological sites that stood out the most were Pedra da Boca (Mouth Stone) State Park, Pedra da Macambira (Macambira Stone), Cânion do Macapá (Macapá Canyon), Porão do Macapá (Macapá Basement), Pedra do Chapéu (Hat Stone), Cânion da Serra Verde (Serra Verde Canyon) and Peladas (Bare Rock), with only the latter not reaching the quantification needed to be considered a geomorphosite, thus constituting six geomorphosites and one geodiversity site.
本文旨在对巴西东北部Pedra da Boca州立公园周围的地貌景观进行定量评估。所使用的方法基于Diniz、Araújo和das Chagas在2022年的研究建议和程序,该研究认为科学和美学价值是地貌定义的核心。在选择了形式并进行了适当的调整后,进行了实地阶段,包括在感兴趣的地点进行评估。因此,要将一个地点归类为地貌,就必须在量化方面具有较高的科学和/或美学价值。如果它在这些类别中没有很高的价值,但有一些其他的潜力,它可以被认为是一个地貌遗址。因此,最突出的地貌遗址是Pedra da Boca(Mouth Stone)州立公园、Pedra达Macambira(Macambara Stone)、Cânion do Macapá,只有后者没有达到被视为地貌组所需的量化,因此构成了六个地貌组和一个地球多样性站点。