Enhancing farm profitability and sustainability through integrated farming systems: A case study of coastal Karnataka, India

Shripad Bhat , Dinesh Kumar , Venkatesh Paramesh , Parveen Kumar , N. Ravishankar , Sunil Kumar , Poonam Kashyap , V. Arunachalam
{"title":"Enhancing farm profitability and sustainability through integrated farming systems: A case study of coastal Karnataka, India","authors":"Shripad Bhat ,&nbsp;Dinesh Kumar ,&nbsp;Venkatesh Paramesh ,&nbsp;Parveen Kumar ,&nbsp;N. Ravishankar ,&nbsp;Sunil Kumar ,&nbsp;Poonam Kashyap ,&nbsp;V. Arunachalam","doi":"10.1016/j.farsys.2023.100052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>India's west coast region is unique due to the co-existence of abundant natural resources and continuous agricultural production. In this region, arecanut is a dominant crop, but due to many factors such as unstable markets, price fluctuations, diseases, etc., the risk faced by farmers has increased. The integrated farming system (IFS) is a viable option for reducing risks and improving productivity and income while also offering multiple benefits to the farm family. Considering these, we collected data from ten farmers' fields in coastal Karnataka, India for the period 2013–2022, to compare arecanut farming with IFS systems where coconut, nutmeg and banana were intercrops with livestock component. Results indicated that IFS had diverse plant species such as plantation crops, fruits, vegetables, flowers, spices, and forest trees offering multiple benefits to the farm families. Various plant species found on the IFS farms were primarily utilized for culinary, ornamental, and religious purposes (benefits worth US$ 421 year<sup>−1</sup>). The arecanut equivalent yield in IFS farms was consistently and significantly higher during the last ten years. The mean net return derived from IFS farms (US$ 7857) was also significantly higher than the arecanut farming (US$ 3990). Energy budgeting indicated that, in IFS, significantly higher direct and renewable energy and lower indirect and non-renewable energy was utilized. Energy output (192,202 ​MJ ​ha<sup>−1</sup>), net energy (120,477 ​MJ ​ha<sup>−1</sup>), energy use efficiency (2.68), and energy profitability (1.68) were significantly higher under the IFS farm compared to the arecanut farming. Employment generation was also significantly higher in IFS (1236.7 mandays year<sup>−1</sup>) than in control farms (755.2 mandays year<sup>−1</sup>), especially for female laborers (2.05 times higher). This study concludes that the adoption of IFS helps in enhancing farm profitability and generating employment opportunities while improving energy use efficiency. Considering these benefits, promoting IFS through subsidy and policy support would help in sustainable development of agriculture sector in this region.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100522,"journal":{"name":"Farming System","volume":"1 3","pages":"Article 100052"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farming System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949911923000540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

India's west coast region is unique due to the co-existence of abundant natural resources and continuous agricultural production. In this region, arecanut is a dominant crop, but due to many factors such as unstable markets, price fluctuations, diseases, etc., the risk faced by farmers has increased. The integrated farming system (IFS) is a viable option for reducing risks and improving productivity and income while also offering multiple benefits to the farm family. Considering these, we collected data from ten farmers' fields in coastal Karnataka, India for the period 2013–2022, to compare arecanut farming with IFS systems where coconut, nutmeg and banana were intercrops with livestock component. Results indicated that IFS had diverse plant species such as plantation crops, fruits, vegetables, flowers, spices, and forest trees offering multiple benefits to the farm families. Various plant species found on the IFS farms were primarily utilized for culinary, ornamental, and religious purposes (benefits worth US$ 421 year−1). The arecanut equivalent yield in IFS farms was consistently and significantly higher during the last ten years. The mean net return derived from IFS farms (US$ 7857) was also significantly higher than the arecanut farming (US$ 3990). Energy budgeting indicated that, in IFS, significantly higher direct and renewable energy and lower indirect and non-renewable energy was utilized. Energy output (192,202 ​MJ ​ha−1), net energy (120,477 ​MJ ​ha−1), energy use efficiency (2.68), and energy profitability (1.68) were significantly higher under the IFS farm compared to the arecanut farming. Employment generation was also significantly higher in IFS (1236.7 mandays year−1) than in control farms (755.2 mandays year−1), especially for female laborers (2.05 times higher). This study concludes that the adoption of IFS helps in enhancing farm profitability and generating employment opportunities while improving energy use efficiency. Considering these benefits, promoting IFS through subsidy and policy support would help in sustainable development of agriculture sector in this region.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过综合农业系统提高农业盈利能力和可持续性:以印度卡纳塔克邦沿海地区为例
印度西海岸地区因其丰富的自然资源和持续的农业生产而独树一帜。在该地区,槟榔是主要作物,但由于市场不稳定、价格波动、疾病等多种因素,农民面临的风险增加。综合农业系统(IFS)是降低风险、提高生产力和收入的可行选择,同时也为农业家庭提供了多种好处。考虑到这些,我们收集了2013-2022年期间印度卡纳塔克邦沿海十个农民田地的数据,将槟榔种植与IFS系统进行了比较,在IFS系统中,椰子、肉豆蔻和香蕉是带有牲畜成分的间作作物。结果表明,IFS拥有多种植物,如种植作物、水果、蔬菜、花卉、香料和林木,为农场家庭提供了多种利益。IFS农场发现的各种植物物种主要用于烹饪、装饰和宗教目的(收益价值421美元-1)。在过去的十年里,IFS农场的arecanut当量产量一直显著较高。IFS农场的平均净回报(7857美元)也显著高于阿雷卡诺特农场(3990美元)。能源预算显示,在综合能源系统中,直接能源和可再生能源的利用率明显较高,间接能源和不可再生能源的使用率较低。能量输出(192202​MJ​ha−1),净能量(120477​MJ​ha−1)、能源使用效率(2.68)和能源盈利能力(1.68)在IFS农场下显著高于阿雷卡诺特农场。IFS的就业率(1236.7个工作日,年-1)也显著高于对照农场(755.2个工作日),尤其是女工(高2.05倍)。这项研究得出的结论是,采用IFS有助于提高农场盈利能力和创造就业机会,同时提高能源使用效率。考虑到这些好处,通过补贴和政策支持促进IFS将有助于该地区农业部门的可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the performance of biobased, recovered nitrogen fertilizers in European cropping systems using modelling Multicriteria assessment of recently implemented conservation agriculture cropping systems across farmers’ plots in northwestern Cambodia How has scientific literature addressed crop planning at farm level: A bibliometric-qualitative review Spatiotemporal variation of crop diversification across Eastern Indo Gangetic plains of South Asia Perennial rice – An alternative to the ‘one-sow, one-harvest’ rice production: Benefits, challenges, and future prospects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1