An Analysis of the Syrian Economy in the Era of Military Conflict, 2011–2020: The Perspective of Government and Economics

Forat Suliman , Homam Khwanda , R.V. Ramana Murthy
{"title":"An Analysis of the Syrian Economy in the Era of Military Conflict, 2011–2020: The Perspective of Government and Economics","authors":"Forat Suliman ,&nbsp;Homam Khwanda ,&nbsp;R.V. Ramana Murthy","doi":"10.1016/j.jge.2023.100082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Moving into the twelfth year of conflict in Syria, the current profile indicates the violence and displacement that unfolded in 2011 have no parallels in recent history. Among the many consequences, physical capital destruction has been the most dramatic- the economic toll of war has been estimated to be about US$1.2 trillion, according to official data. This paper takes stock of the conflict's impact on domestic capital in Syria. It also contributes to the empirical literature on the effect of government capital spending on private capital during 1970–2011, using Vector Error Model (VECM) model. The key findings are: (1) the economy facing extreme limitations in raising the investment rate- as the total investment share of GDP (in real term) has dropped from 20% in 2010 to less than 7% in 2020; (2) the public investment appears to have a significant role- as it influences the economic growth in Syria directly and indirectly through private investment (in which crowding- in effect found to be significant). Further, we argue that political and institutional factors will determine the shape and scope of attracting foreign capital and enhancing local business during the reconstruction phase.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100785,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Government and Economics","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100082"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Government and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667319323000253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Moving into the twelfth year of conflict in Syria, the current profile indicates the violence and displacement that unfolded in 2011 have no parallels in recent history. Among the many consequences, physical capital destruction has been the most dramatic- the economic toll of war has been estimated to be about US$1.2 trillion, according to official data. This paper takes stock of the conflict's impact on domestic capital in Syria. It also contributes to the empirical literature on the effect of government capital spending on private capital during 1970–2011, using Vector Error Model (VECM) model. The key findings are: (1) the economy facing extreme limitations in raising the investment rate- as the total investment share of GDP (in real term) has dropped from 20% in 2010 to less than 7% in 2020; (2) the public investment appears to have a significant role- as it influences the economic growth in Syria directly and indirectly through private investment (in which crowding- in effect found to be significant). Further, we argue that political and institutional factors will determine the shape and scope of attracting foreign capital and enhancing local business during the reconstruction phase.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2011-2020年军事冲突时代叙利亚经济分析:政府与经济学视角
进入叙利亚冲突的第十二年,目前的情况表明,2011年发生的暴力和流离失所在近代史上没有相似之处。在众多后果中,实物资本破坏是最严重的——根据官方数据,战争造成的经济损失估计约为1.2万亿美元。本文评估了冲突对叙利亚国内资本的影响。它还使用向量误差模型(VECM)模型为1970-2011年政府资本支出对私人资本影响的实证文献做出了贡献。主要发现是:(1)经济在提高投资率方面面临极端限制,因为总投资占GDP的比例(实际值)已从2010年的20%降至2020年的7%以下;(2) 公共投资似乎发挥着重要作用,因为它通过私人投资直接或间接影响叙利亚的经济增长(其中拥挤效应显著)。此外,我们认为,政治和体制因素将决定重建阶段吸引外国资本和加强当地商业的形式和范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does better governance abate the external debt–capital flight revolvement in sub-Saharan Africa? Editorial Board The contributions of foreign aid and natural resource wealth to democratic institutions: Evidence from over 40 years of sub-Sahara Africa's history Editor's note: Market-preserving government, global value chains, trade remedies, center-state transfers, and foreign aid. The nature of market-preserving government
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1