The Nexus between Financial and Investment developments and State Capacity. The case of G-20

Sotirios K. Bellos, Petros Golitsis
{"title":"The Nexus between Financial and Investment developments and State Capacity. The case of G-20","authors":"Sotirios K. Bellos,&nbsp;Petros Golitsis","doi":"10.1016/j.jge.2023.100081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>On this paper we examine the relationships between state capacity, approximated by the Composite Index of National Capabilities, and certain macroeconomic and financial variables. Particularly, we study the nexus of their interactions by focusing on the G-20 economies from 1980 to 2020 by applying a robust GMM panel VAR model. Our results capture a negative and lasting impact of ‘domestic credit to private sector’, a negative short-term impact of market capitalization, along with a positive impact of inward and outward FDIs, and of gross capital formation, on state capacity. State capacity, in its turn, enhances in the short-term market capitalization, consumes credit to private sector, and substantially boosts gross capital formation in the medium-term. Trade openness enhances state capacity and is enhanced by state capacity as well. The presence of financial crises, such as the Asian Financial Crisis or the Global Financial Crisis, affects negatively state capacity. Conversely, the absence of financial crises has a positive impact on state capacity, leading to its amelioration. Furthermore, the specific case of the Second Oil Crisis is found to strengthen state capacity. These findings shed light to the mechanisms that impact national power and provide a framework for policy design and conduct.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100785,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Government and Economics","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100081"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Government and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667319323000241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

On this paper we examine the relationships between state capacity, approximated by the Composite Index of National Capabilities, and certain macroeconomic and financial variables. Particularly, we study the nexus of their interactions by focusing on the G-20 economies from 1980 to 2020 by applying a robust GMM panel VAR model. Our results capture a negative and lasting impact of ‘domestic credit to private sector’, a negative short-term impact of market capitalization, along with a positive impact of inward and outward FDIs, and of gross capital formation, on state capacity. State capacity, in its turn, enhances in the short-term market capitalization, consumes credit to private sector, and substantially boosts gross capital formation in the medium-term. Trade openness enhances state capacity and is enhanced by state capacity as well. The presence of financial crises, such as the Asian Financial Crisis or the Global Financial Crisis, affects negatively state capacity. Conversely, the absence of financial crises has a positive impact on state capacity, leading to its amelioration. Furthermore, the specific case of the Second Oil Crisis is found to strengthen state capacity. These findings shed light to the mechanisms that impact national power and provide a framework for policy design and conduct.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金融和投资发展与国家能力之间的联系。G-20的情况
在本文中,我们研究了国家能力(由国家能力综合指数近似)与某些宏观经济和金融变量之间的关系。特别是,我们通过应用稳健的GMM面板VAR模型,重点关注1980年至2020年的20国集团经济体,研究它们之间的相互作用关系。我们的研究结果反映了“国内信贷对私营部门”的负面和持久影响,市场资本化的负面短期影响,以及内外部FDI和总资本形成对国家能力的积极影响。反过来,国家能力在短期内增强了市场资本化,消耗了对私营部门的信贷,并在中期大幅增加了资本形成总额。贸易开放增强了国家能力,也因国家能力而增强。亚洲金融危机或全球金融危机等金融危机的存在对国家能力产生了负面影响。相反,没有金融危机会对国家能力产生积极影响,从而改善国家能力。此外,第二次石油危机的具体案例被发现加强了国家能力。这些发现揭示了影响国家权力的机制,并为政策设计和行为提供了框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does better governance abate the external debt–capital flight revolvement in sub-Saharan Africa? Editorial Board The contributions of foreign aid and natural resource wealth to democratic institutions: Evidence from over 40 years of sub-Sahara Africa's history Editor's note: Market-preserving government, global value chains, trade remedies, center-state transfers, and foreign aid. The nature of market-preserving government
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1