MaaS for the masses: Potential transit accessibility gains and required policies under Mobility-as-a-Service

Marc Hasselwander , Simon Nieland , Kathleen Dematera-Contreras , Mirko Goletz
{"title":"MaaS for the masses: Potential transit accessibility gains and required policies under Mobility-as-a-Service","authors":"Marc Hasselwander ,&nbsp;Simon Nieland ,&nbsp;Kathleen Dematera-Contreras ,&nbsp;Mirko Goletz","doi":"10.1016/j.multra.2023.100086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Transit accessibility, the conditions and distance under which people have access to transit services, is one of the key indicators to assess the performance of cities' transit systems. The more people can access the transit system, the better its performance in terms of social equity (e.g., more equal access to jobs, education, and other opportunities). To inform policymakers and support decision-making, it is crucial to measure potential transit accessibility changes of transport investments. Due to the paucity of available data, however, calculating and monitoring transit accessibility is a difficult task. Anchored in SDG 11 for more ‘Sustainable Cities and Communities’, the UN has thus proposed a simplified, globally applicable indicator for the performance of cities’ transit systems (SDG 11.2.1) that measures the share of the population living in a walking distance of 500 m to the transit system. Building on this definition and leveraging open data sources, we analyze potential transit accessibility gains under Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) in Metro Manila, Philippines. We show that the integration of paratransit (i.e., jeepneys) into the transit network could almost triple access to transit from 23.9 % to 65.0 %. The integration of micro-mobility (i.e., e-scooter and bicycles) as a feeder mode could further increase this share significantly (to 97.9 % and 99.9 %, respectively). We outline and discuss evidence-based policy recommendations to exploit this potential and foster a sustainable development under MaaS. Finally, we conclude with a research agenda for micro-mobility and MaaS in developing countries, a topic which has been widely overlooked in the scientific literature so far.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100933,"journal":{"name":"Multimodal Transportation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multimodal Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772586323000187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Transit accessibility, the conditions and distance under which people have access to transit services, is one of the key indicators to assess the performance of cities' transit systems. The more people can access the transit system, the better its performance in terms of social equity (e.g., more equal access to jobs, education, and other opportunities). To inform policymakers and support decision-making, it is crucial to measure potential transit accessibility changes of transport investments. Due to the paucity of available data, however, calculating and monitoring transit accessibility is a difficult task. Anchored in SDG 11 for more ‘Sustainable Cities and Communities’, the UN has thus proposed a simplified, globally applicable indicator for the performance of cities’ transit systems (SDG 11.2.1) that measures the share of the population living in a walking distance of 500 m to the transit system. Building on this definition and leveraging open data sources, we analyze potential transit accessibility gains under Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) in Metro Manila, Philippines. We show that the integration of paratransit (i.e., jeepneys) into the transit network could almost triple access to transit from 23.9 % to 65.0 %. The integration of micro-mobility (i.e., e-scooter and bicycles) as a feeder mode could further increase this share significantly (to 97.9 % and 99.9 %, respectively). We outline and discuss evidence-based policy recommendations to exploit this potential and foster a sustainable development under MaaS. Finally, we conclude with a research agenda for micro-mobility and MaaS in developing countries, a topic which has been widely overlooked in the scientific literature so far.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面向大众的MaaS:移动即服务下潜在的交通可达性收益和所需政策
公交可达性,即人们获得公交服务的条件和距离,是评估城市公交系统性能的关键指标之一。越多的人可以使用交通系统,其在社会公平方面的表现就越好(例如,获得工作、教育和其他机会的机会就越平等)。为了向决策者提供信息并支持决策,衡量交通投资的潜在交通可达性变化至关重要。然而,由于缺乏可用数据,计算和监测公交可达性是一项艰巨的任务。因此,联合国以可持续发展目标11为基础,提出了一个简化的、全球适用的城市交通系统绩效指标(可持续发展目标11.2.1),用于衡量距离交通系统500米步行距离内的人口比例。基于这一定义并利用开放的数据源,我们分析了菲律宾马尼拉大都会移动即服务(MaaS)下的潜在交通可达性收益。我们表明,将副公交(即吉普尼)纳入公交网络几乎可以将公交接入率从23.9%提高到65.0%。将微型移动(即电动踏板车和自行车)作为一种供给模式的整合可以进一步大幅提高这一份额(分别达到97.9%和99.9%)。我们概述并讨论了基于证据的政策建议,以利用这一潜力,并在MaaS下促进可持续发展。最后,我们总结了发展中国家微观流动性和MaaS的研究议程,这一主题迄今为止在科学文献中被广泛忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relationship between urban traffic crashes and temporal/meteorological conditions: understanding and predicting the effects An assignment-based decomposition approach for the vehicle routing problem with backhauls An adapted savings algorithm for planning heterogeneous logistics with uncrewed aerial vehicles Catastrophic causes of truck drivers’ crashes on Brazilian highways: Mixed method analyses and crash prediction using machine learning Reinforcement learning in transportation research: Frontiers and future directions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1