Divergent or identical? Revealed preference modeling of individual and group ARIS passengers’ airport arrival behaviors

Yonglei Jiang , Hongyu Tang , Wenqian Zou , Shunan Yu
{"title":"Divergent or identical? Revealed preference modeling of individual and group ARIS passengers’ airport arrival behaviors","authors":"Yonglei Jiang ,&nbsp;Hongyu Tang ,&nbsp;Wenqian Zou ,&nbsp;Shunan Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.multra.2023.100084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Considering the high ratio of group travellers to individual travellers among air-rail integrated service (ARIS) passengers, the airport arrival behaviors of both individual and group ARIS passengers are thoroughly analyzed and compared with the multinomial logit model and mixed multinomial logit model by taking the group as the decision unit. Compared with individual ARIS passengers, the results show that: first, the airport arrival behaviors of group ARIS passengers should be analyzed separately according to the goodness of fit; second, group ARIS passengers attach more importance to both group sociodemographics and ARIS trip attributes; and third, groups with close member relations and a high ratio of males prefer alternatives with the shortest total ground access time. Finally, group ARIS passengers consistently prefer ARIS trip attributes after conducting group decision-making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100933,"journal":{"name":"Multimodal Transportation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multimodal Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772586323000163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considering the high ratio of group travellers to individual travellers among air-rail integrated service (ARIS) passengers, the airport arrival behaviors of both individual and group ARIS passengers are thoroughly analyzed and compared with the multinomial logit model and mixed multinomial logit model by taking the group as the decision unit. Compared with individual ARIS passengers, the results show that: first, the airport arrival behaviors of group ARIS passengers should be analyzed separately according to the goodness of fit; second, group ARIS passengers attach more importance to both group sociodemographics and ARIS trip attributes; and third, groups with close member relations and a high ratio of males prefer alternatives with the shortest total ground access time. Finally, group ARIS passengers consistently prefer ARIS trip attributes after conducting group decision-making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分歧还是相同?ARIS个体和群体旅客机场到达行为的偏好揭示模型
考虑到航空-铁路综合服务(ARIS)乘客中团体旅客与个人旅客的比例较高,以团体为决策单元,对个人和团体ARIS乘客的机场到达行为进行了深入分析,并与多项式logit模型和混合多项式logit模型进行了比较。与个别ARIS旅客相比,结果表明:首先,应根据拟合优度对ARIS旅客群体的机场到达行为进行单独分析;第二,群体ARIS乘客更重视群体社会人口统计和ARIS旅行属性;第三,成员关系密切、男性比例高的群体更喜欢总地面进入时间最短的替代方案。最后,在进行群体决策后,群体ARIS乘客始终更喜欢ARIS行程属性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relationship between urban traffic crashes and temporal/meteorological conditions: understanding and predicting the effects An assignment-based decomposition approach for the vehicle routing problem with backhauls An adapted savings algorithm for planning heterogeneous logistics with uncrewed aerial vehicles Catastrophic causes of truck drivers’ crashes on Brazilian highways: Mixed method analyses and crash prediction using machine learning Reinforcement learning in transportation research: Frontiers and future directions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1