Beam-on-spring modeling of buried MDPE pipes in sand subjected to lateral loads at a pipe junction

IF 4.9 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jpse.2023.100125
Tanmoy Sinha, Ashutosh Sutra Dhar
{"title":"Beam-on-spring modeling of buried MDPE pipes in sand subjected to lateral loads at a pipe junction","authors":"Tanmoy Sinha,&nbsp;Ashutosh Sutra Dhar","doi":"10.1016/j.jpse.2023.100125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Buried pipelines in landslide areas may experience excessive stresses or strains that depend on a complex soil-pipe interaction. The simplified beam-on-spring analysis is recommended in current pipe design guidelines to assess buried pipes subjected to ground movements. The recommended method was developed based on observations of buried steel pipes. The applicability of the methods was not evaluated for Medium-Density Polyethylene (MDPE) pipes that are widely used in gas distribution systems. This paper evaluates the applicability of the beam-on-spring modeling technique for MDPE pipes experiencing relative ground movements observed in laboratory tests. Finite element analysis was performed, modeling the pipes as beams and the soil reactions using the pipe-soil-interaction (PSI) elements in Abaqus, representing springs. The study reveals that while the beam-on-spring analysis can simulate the pipe responses, the spring parameters recommended in the design guidelines are not applicable to buried MDPE pipes. The required magnitudes of peak axial and lateral spring forces and the yield displacements for MDPE pipes are larger than those recommended in the design guidelines. Based on the simulation of experimentally measured pipe responses, modifications to the recommendations of existing design guidelines for estimating the spring parameters are proposed for application to the MDPE pipe assessment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100824,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100125"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667143323000173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Buried pipelines in landslide areas may experience excessive stresses or strains that depend on a complex soil-pipe interaction. The simplified beam-on-spring analysis is recommended in current pipe design guidelines to assess buried pipes subjected to ground movements. The recommended method was developed based on observations of buried steel pipes. The applicability of the methods was not evaluated for Medium-Density Polyethylene (MDPE) pipes that are widely used in gas distribution systems. This paper evaluates the applicability of the beam-on-spring modeling technique for MDPE pipes experiencing relative ground movements observed in laboratory tests. Finite element analysis was performed, modeling the pipes as beams and the soil reactions using the pipe-soil-interaction (PSI) elements in Abaqus, representing springs. The study reveals that while the beam-on-spring analysis can simulate the pipe responses, the spring parameters recommended in the design guidelines are not applicable to buried MDPE pipes. The required magnitudes of peak axial and lateral spring forces and the yield displacements for MDPE pipes are larger than those recommended in the design guidelines. Based on the simulation of experimentally measured pipe responses, modifications to the recommendations of existing design guidelines for estimating the spring parameters are proposed for application to the MDPE pipe assessment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
砂中埋地MDPE管道在管接头处承受横向载荷的梁-弹簧模型
滑坡地区的埋地管道可能会承受过大的应力或应变,这取决于复杂的土壤-管道相互作用。现行管道设计指南中建议采用简化的弹簧梁分析,以评估受到地面移动影响的埋地管道。推荐的方法是根据埋地钢管的观测结果制定的。未对广泛用于气体分配系统的中密度聚乙烯(MDPE)管道评估这些方法的适用性。本文评估了梁-弹簧建模技术在MDPE管道经历实验室试验中观察到的相对地面运动时的适用性。进行了有限元分析,将管道建模为梁,并使用Abaqus中代表弹簧的管道-土壤相互作用(PSI)单元对土壤反应进行建模。研究表明,虽然梁-弹簧分析可以模拟管道响应,但设计指南中建议的弹簧参数不适用于埋地MDPE管道。MDPE管道所需的峰值轴向和横向弹簧力以及屈服位移的大小大于设计指南中建议的值。基于对实验测量的管道响应的模拟,提出了对现有弹簧参数估计设计指南建议的修改,以应用于MDPE管道评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Accelerate the development of a new energy system with “substance-energy network” as the foundation Effect of phase change on corrosion behavior of X65 steel in CO2 transportation pipeline environment Characterization of CTOA for resistance to pipeline ductile fracture propagation An experimental investigation on the turbulent drag reduction effect of polyacrylamide solution in the loop pipe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1