Emerging strategies for regeneration of historic urban sites: A systematic literature review

Q1 Social Sciences City, Culture and Society Pub Date : 2023-09-13 DOI:10.1016/j.ccs.2023.100539
K. Pulles, I.A.M. Conti, M.B. de Kleijn, B. Kusters, T. Rous, L.C. Havinga, D. Ikiz Kaya
{"title":"Emerging strategies for regeneration of historic urban sites: A systematic literature review","authors":"K. Pulles,&nbsp;I.A.M. Conti,&nbsp;M.B. de Kleijn,&nbsp;B. Kusters,&nbsp;T. Rous,&nbsp;L.C. Havinga,&nbsp;D. Ikiz Kaya","doi":"10.1016/j.ccs.2023.100539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The importance and effectiveness of adaptive reuse as an alternative to the demolition of cultural heritage is well-studied. However, increasing demand in cities to redevelop larger scale urban historic sites requires new strategies to benefit from their inherent values. This paper focuses on strategies of regeneration for historic urban sites. The paper presents a systematic literature review of 45 papers, with case studies geographically concentrated in Europe and Asia, and a focus on residential, commercial, and industrial areas. From the case studies, 46 different regeneration strategies have been deduced. The various strategies are, via content analysis, dissected into a select number of drivers to find commonalities. These key drivers are user participation, top-down, genius loci, sustainability, and conversion. Based on the reflections of the reviewed authors, a performance evaluation assesses the outcomes of these strategies. Further data analysis is conducted at the level of individual drivers as well as their combinations to deduce the most positive-evaluated strategies. Findings show that genius loci contributes to the most positive-evaluated strategies, while top-down driven strategies contribute to the most negative-evaluated strategies. Furthermore, strategies are assessed positively when three or more drivers are considered regardless of their combination. This paper acts as a starting point for further research into the formation of regeneration strategies and into the specific drivers and their combinations or underlying relations. Moreover, it can be of contribution to the practice, to support decision makers and urban planners in developing the appropriate regeneration strategy for historic urban sites.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39061,"journal":{"name":"City, Culture and Society","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100539"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"City, Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877916623000383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The importance and effectiveness of adaptive reuse as an alternative to the demolition of cultural heritage is well-studied. However, increasing demand in cities to redevelop larger scale urban historic sites requires new strategies to benefit from their inherent values. This paper focuses on strategies of regeneration for historic urban sites. The paper presents a systematic literature review of 45 papers, with case studies geographically concentrated in Europe and Asia, and a focus on residential, commercial, and industrial areas. From the case studies, 46 different regeneration strategies have been deduced. The various strategies are, via content analysis, dissected into a select number of drivers to find commonalities. These key drivers are user participation, top-down, genius loci, sustainability, and conversion. Based on the reflections of the reviewed authors, a performance evaluation assesses the outcomes of these strategies. Further data analysis is conducted at the level of individual drivers as well as their combinations to deduce the most positive-evaluated strategies. Findings show that genius loci contributes to the most positive-evaluated strategies, while top-down driven strategies contribute to the most negative-evaluated strategies. Furthermore, strategies are assessed positively when three or more drivers are considered regardless of their combination. This paper acts as a starting point for further research into the formation of regeneration strategies and into the specific drivers and their combinations or underlying relations. Moreover, it can be of contribution to the practice, to support decision makers and urban planners in developing the appropriate regeneration strategy for historic urban sites.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城市历史遗址更新的新兴策略:系统文献综述
对适应性再利用作为拆除文化遗产的替代方案的重要性和有效性进行了深入研究。然而,城市重建更大规模城市历史遗迹的需求不断增加,需要新的战略来从其固有价值中受益。本文主要研究城市历史遗址的再生策略。本文对45篇论文进行了系统的文献综述,案例研究集中在欧洲和亚洲,重点关注住宅、商业和工业领域。从案例研究中,我们推断出46种不同的再生策略。通过内容分析,将各种策略分解为选定数量的驱动因素,以找到共性。这些关键驱动因素是用户参与、自上而下、天才所在地、可持续性和转化。基于被审查作者的反思,绩效评估评估了这些策略的结果。在个体驾驶员及其组合的层面上进行进一步的数据分析,以推断出最积极的评估策略。研究结果表明,天才基因座对最积极的评价策略有贡献,而自上而下驱动的策略对最消极的评价策略也有贡献。此外,当考虑三个或三个以上的驾驶员时,无论他们的组合如何,都会对策略进行积极评估。本文为进一步研究再生策略的形成以及具体的驱动因素及其组合或潜在关系提供了一个起点。此外,它还可以为这一实践做出贡献,支持决策者和城市规划者制定适当的城市历史遗址再生战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
City, Culture and Society
City, Culture and Society Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The public library building as nexus for social interactions: Cases from Helsinki Urban religion and gendered bodies Decoding urban power: Architecture, symbolism and territorial control in Caracas Analysis of contextual factors influencing the development of unplanned settlements: The case of Herat City, Afghanistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1