Predicting reading comprehension performance based on student characteristics and item properties

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Studies in Educational Evaluation Pub Date : 2023-10-18 DOI:10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101309
Mehrdad Yousefpoori-Naeim , Okan Bulut , Bin Tan
{"title":"Predicting reading comprehension performance based on student characteristics and item properties","authors":"Mehrdad Yousefpoori-Naeim ,&nbsp;Okan Bulut ,&nbsp;Bin Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although learner characteristics and item properties are known to affect students’ reading comprehension performance, little research has focused on the interactions between these two types of features. This study investigated the effects of learner factors (i.e., gender, the main language spoken at home, multilingualism, and instruction on reading strategies) and item factors (i.e., item format and cognitive process), as well as their interactions, on Canadian students’ performance (<em>n</em> = 16,688) in the reading test of PISA 2018. The results indicated that all learner and item factors significantly predicted reading comprehension. Open-response items were more difficult for male students compared to their female peers. Receiving instruction on reading strategies was most helpful in answering the understanding type of items. Students who mainly spoke the test language at home were specifically better at answering items focused on locating information, while multilingualism appeared to compensate for not speaking the test language at home.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 101309"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X23000755","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although learner characteristics and item properties are known to affect students’ reading comprehension performance, little research has focused on the interactions between these two types of features. This study investigated the effects of learner factors (i.e., gender, the main language spoken at home, multilingualism, and instruction on reading strategies) and item factors (i.e., item format and cognitive process), as well as their interactions, on Canadian students’ performance (n = 16,688) in the reading test of PISA 2018. The results indicated that all learner and item factors significantly predicted reading comprehension. Open-response items were more difficult for male students compared to their female peers. Receiving instruction on reading strategies was most helpful in answering the understanding type of items. Students who mainly spoke the test language at home were specifically better at answering items focused on locating information, while multilingualism appeared to compensate for not speaking the test language at home.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于学生特点和项目特性预测阅读理解成绩
尽管已知学习者特征和项目属性会影响学生的阅读理解表现,但很少有研究关注这两类特征之间的相互作用。本研究调查了学习者因素(即性别、在家说的主要语言、多语性和阅读策略指导)和项目因素(即项目形式和认知过程)及其相互作用对加拿大学生在PISA 2018阅读测试中表现的影响(n=16688)。结果表明,所有学习者和项目因素都能显著预测阅读理解。与女生相比,男生的开放式回答项目更难。接受阅读策略的指导对回答理解类型的项目最有帮助。主要在家说测试语言的学生特别擅长回答专注于定位信息的项目,而使用多种语言似乎可以弥补在家不说测试语言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
90
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Studies in Educational Evaluation publishes original reports of evaluation studies. Four types of articles are published by the journal: (a) Empirical evaluation studies representing evaluation practice in educational systems around the world; (b) Theoretical reflections and empirical studies related to issues involved in the evaluation of educational programs, educational institutions, educational personnel and student assessment; (c) Articles summarizing the state-of-the-art concerning specific topics in evaluation in general or in a particular country or group of countries; (d) Book reviews and brief abstracts of evaluation studies.
期刊最新文献
Teaching quality and student achievement inequalities in low- and middle-income countries: A hierarchical linear model analysis Do children speaking indigenous and regional languages benefit equally from updated curricula? A report on a longitudinal quasi-experimental pilot study in Central Asia Exploring the impact of student perceptions of Assessment for Learning on intrinsic motivation How are pre-service physical education teachers’ perceptions of educator-created (dis)empowering climates associated with their motivational processes and teaching intention? Online peer feedback training based on self-regulated learning in english as a foreign language writing: Perceived usefulness and students’ engagement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1