Experimental evaluation of axial compression performance of precast panels from bamboo-reinforced concrete

IF 2.2 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Applications in engineering science Pub Date : 2023-10-06 DOI:10.1016/j.apples.2023.100155
Muhtar, Amri Gunasti
{"title":"Experimental evaluation of axial compression performance of precast panels from bamboo-reinforced concrete","authors":"Muhtar,&nbsp;Amri Gunasti","doi":"10.1016/j.apples.2023.100155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research aimed to determine the performance of bamboo-reinforced concrete precast panels (BRCPP) subjected to axial compressive loads, validated using numerical simulations. Axial compressive load capacity, crack, and failure patterns were investigated and compared with steel-reinforced concrete precast panels (SRCPP) as a control. Eight panels were made with details of four BRCPP and SRCPP, having dimensions of 1200 × 400 × 50 mm<sup>3</sup> each. The four SRCPPs consisted of two panels, produced in laboratories and two manufactured by local companies. The variations in bamboo reinforcement spacing were 150 mm and 180 mm, while the gap between steels was 180 mm, and panels were tested under axial compressive load. The results showed that the axial compressive load capacity of BRCPP with a bamboo reinforcement size of 12 × 12 mm<sup>2</sup> at a distance of 150 mm was sufficient to meet the specifications of SRCPP panels produced by the local industry. Based on experimental, theoretical, and numerical simulation analysis, the performance of BRCPP showed suitability, making it a considerable choice, specifically for precast panels. The special advantage of BRCPP encompassed eco-friendliness and sustainability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72251,"journal":{"name":"Applications in engineering science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applications in engineering science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666496823000304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aimed to determine the performance of bamboo-reinforced concrete precast panels (BRCPP) subjected to axial compressive loads, validated using numerical simulations. Axial compressive load capacity, crack, and failure patterns were investigated and compared with steel-reinforced concrete precast panels (SRCPP) as a control. Eight panels were made with details of four BRCPP and SRCPP, having dimensions of 1200 × 400 × 50 mm3 each. The four SRCPPs consisted of two panels, produced in laboratories and two manufactured by local companies. The variations in bamboo reinforcement spacing were 150 mm and 180 mm, while the gap between steels was 180 mm, and panels were tested under axial compressive load. The results showed that the axial compressive load capacity of BRCPP with a bamboo reinforcement size of 12 × 12 mm2 at a distance of 150 mm was sufficient to meet the specifications of SRCPP panels produced by the local industry. Based on experimental, theoretical, and numerical simulation analysis, the performance of BRCPP showed suitability, making it a considerable choice, specifically for precast panels. The special advantage of BRCPP encompassed eco-friendliness and sustainability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
竹筋混凝土预制板轴心受压性能的试验评价
本研究旨在确定竹筋混凝土预制板(BRCPP)在轴向压缩载荷下的性能,并通过数值模拟进行验证。研究了轴压承载力、裂缝和破坏模式,并与钢筋混凝土预制板(SRCPP)作为对照进行了比较。八块面板由四块BRCPP和SRCPP的细节制成,每块尺寸为1200×400×50 mm3。四个SRCPP由两块在实验室生产的面板和两块由当地公司生产的面板组成。竹筋间距的变化为150 mm和180 mm,而钢之间的间隙为180 mm,并在轴向压缩载荷下对面板进行了测试。结果表明,竹筋尺寸为12×12 mm2的BRCPP在150 mm的距离处的轴向压缩承载能力足以满足当地工业生产的SRCPP面板的规格。基于实验、理论和数值模拟分析,BRCPP的性能显示出适用性,使其成为一个相当大的选择,特别是预制板。BRCPP的特殊优势包括生态友好性和可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applications in engineering science
Applications in engineering science Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
68 days
期刊最新文献
Numerical simulation of open channel basaltic lava flow through topographical bends An experimental study on heat transfer using electrohydrodynamics (EHD) over a heated vertical plate. Lattice Boltzmann simulations of unsteady Bingham fluid flows Thermo-fluid performance of axially perforated multiple rectangular flow deflector-type baffle plate in an tubular heat exchanger H(div)-conforming and discontinuous Galerkin approach for Herschel–Bulkley flow with density-dependent viscosity and yield stress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1