Le complexe d’Œdipe et les systèmes de parenté face aux transformations de la famille contemporaine : un débat entre anthropologie et psychanalyse

V.M.N. Martins
{"title":"Le complexe d’Œdipe et les systèmes de parenté face aux transformations de la famille contemporaine : un débat entre anthropologie et psychanalyse","authors":"V.M.N. Martins","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2023.100345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This article proposes a critical reading of the concept of the Oedipus complex in Freud's work from the point of view of the issues raised in anthropology regarding the question of kinship systems.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>We will try to understand how the influence of evolutionary anthropology on the Freudian conception of the family can be a theoretical obstacle in the face of the transformations of the contemporary family in the West.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We will analyze the Freudian hypotheses from <em>Totem and taboo</em> in light of Malinowski's criticisms of the universality of in the Oedipus complex as well as those of Godelier, Lévi-Strauss, and Schneider on the evolutionary paradigm in anthropological research on systems of kinship.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The critique of the fundamentally reproductive and biologicist conception of the family inherent in evolutionary anthropology and in the Oedipal theories presented in <em>Totem and Taboo</em> can allow psychoanalysts to avoid a normative position with regard to the new forms of family-making.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretations</h3><p>The scope of Freudian theories remains limited when confronting the transformations of the contemporary Western family, but Freud's theoretical developments around the concept of “complex” and the double Oedipus complex provide psychoanalysts with leads that can enable them to evade the evolutionary conception of kinship systems inherent in the classic Oedipus complex.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100345"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S254236062300015X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This article proposes a critical reading of the concept of the Oedipus complex in Freud's work from the point of view of the issues raised in anthropology regarding the question of kinship systems.

Objectives

We will try to understand how the influence of evolutionary anthropology on the Freudian conception of the family can be a theoretical obstacle in the face of the transformations of the contemporary family in the West.

Method

We will analyze the Freudian hypotheses from Totem and taboo in light of Malinowski's criticisms of the universality of in the Oedipus complex as well as those of Godelier, Lévi-Strauss, and Schneider on the evolutionary paradigm in anthropological research on systems of kinship.

Results

The critique of the fundamentally reproductive and biologicist conception of the family inherent in evolutionary anthropology and in the Oedipal theories presented in Totem and Taboo can allow psychoanalysts to avoid a normative position with regard to the new forms of family-making.

Interpretations

The scope of Freudian theories remains limited when confronting the transformations of the contemporary Western family, but Freud's theoretical developments around the concept of “complex” and the double Oedipus complex provide psychoanalysts with leads that can enable them to evade the evolutionary conception of kinship systems inherent in the classic Oedipus complex.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面对当代家庭变革的俄狄浦斯情结和亲属关系系统:人类学和精神分析之间的辩论。
背景本文从人类学中有关亲属制度问题的角度,对弗洛伊德作品中的俄狄浦斯情结进行了批判性解读。目的我们将试图理解进化人类学对弗洛伊德家庭观的影响如何成为西方当代家庭转型的理论障碍Godelier、Lévi Strauss和Schneider关于人类学亲属制度研究中的进化范式。结果对进化人类学和《图腾》和《禁忌》中的俄狄浦斯理论所固有的基本生殖和生物主义家庭概念的批判,可以让精神分析学家避免对新的家庭形成形式采取规范立场但弗洛伊德围绕“情结”概念和双重俄狄浦斯情结的理论发展为精神分析学家提供了线索,使他们能够避开经典俄狄浦s情结中固有的亲属系统的进化概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cybercapitalisme et inconscient économique : la manipulation invisible des désirs et des comportements Économie psychique et écoanxiété. Ce que la théorie freudienne apporte à l’écologie politique “There is a crack in everything, That's how the light gets in”. Maintaining hygiene and striving for purity: An interdisciplinary study D’autres vibrations : recension de l’ouvrage La vallée du silicium, d’Alain Damasio, (Seuil, 2024) Impossible régulation de l’inconscient ? À propos de l’article « Inconscient économique et influences non conscientes de la publicité » de D. Courbet
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1