Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.inan.2025.100567
C. Racin, R. Minjard
{"title":"Éprouver la transdisciplinarité : penser entre les lignes, agir entre les mondes","authors":"C. Racin, R. Minjard","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2025.100567","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.inan.2025.100567","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"9 3","pages":"Article 100567"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145618202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-07DOI: 10.1016/j.inan.2025.100564
J. Violon
Context
This theoretical and clinical article offers an epistemological exploration of a therapeutic dispositif entitled strolling beyond the walls, based on weekly outdoor walks with patients receiving psychiatric care.
Objectives
Grounded in this practice, the article questions the conditions under which clinical knowledge is produced, adopting an indisciplinary posture – understood as a transdisciplinary approach that resists theoretical and methodological compartmentalization in favor of an exploratory movement.
Methods
The field of knowledge drawn upon successively brings together anthropology, philosophy, history, and art, in dialogue with clinical psychology informed by psychoanalytic theory. Four “indisciplinary detours” structure the text: the symbolic history of errancy and walking ; walking as a gesture of transgression and reappropriation of public space; itinerant artistic practices as forms of expression, critique, and creation; and finally, a reflection on the living and nature as relational environment, within a post-naturalist perspective. The method is based on the articulation between clinical practice, researcher reflexivity, and the integration of theoretical references drawn from distinct disciplinary domains.
Results
The results examine the resonances between this indisciplinary exploration and the therapeutic processes supported by the clinical dispositif – particularly in relation to sensorimotor experience, group inscription in space, primary symbolization, and the possibility of generating traces (bodily, sensory, narrative) of the therapeutic experience.
Interpretations
The conclusion underlines the epistemological and political significance of this approach.
{"title":"Détours indisciplinaires : mouvement d’exploration autour d’une pratique clinique itinérante « hors les murs »","authors":"J. Violon","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2025.100564","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.inan.2025.100564","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>This theoretical and clinical article offers an epistemological exploration of a therapeutic dispositif entitled <em>strolling beyond the walls</em>, based on weekly outdoor walks with patients receiving psychiatric care.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Grounded in this practice, the article questions the conditions under which clinical knowledge is produced, adopting an indisciplinary posture – understood as a transdisciplinary approach that resists theoretical and methodological compartmentalization in favor of an exploratory movement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The field of knowledge drawn upon successively brings together anthropology, philosophy, history, and art, in dialogue with clinical psychology informed by psychoanalytic theory. Four “indisciplinary detours” structure the text: the symbolic history of errancy and walking ; walking as a gesture of transgression and reappropriation of public space; itinerant artistic practices as forms of expression, critique, and creation; and finally, a reflection on the living and nature as relational environment, within a post-naturalist perspective. The method is based on the articulation between clinical practice, researcher reflexivity, and the integration of theoretical references drawn from distinct disciplinary domains.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The results examine the resonances between this indisciplinary exploration and the therapeutic processes supported by the clinical dispositif – particularly in relation to sensorimotor experience, group inscription in space, primary symbolization, and the possibility of generating traces (bodily, sensory, narrative) of the therapeutic experience.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretations</h3><div>The conclusion underlines the epistemological and political significance of this approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"9 3","pages":"Article 100564"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145468017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-05DOI: 10.1016/j.inan.2025.100566
L. Chagneaud, M. Roques
Context
Alcohol is considered as cultural object since such time. Drinkers who deviate from the norm of “drinking well” are therefore marginalized, deviating from social norms.
Aim
The aim of this article is to question the origin of the term “disease” in the field of addiction care and its consequences for addict people.
Methods
When they lose their normativity, rather than their normality, drinkers seek help from healthcare facilities. Drinkers move from stigmatization to “un-guiltification” and becoming dependent on medical normality, which is opposed to social norms because of drastic reduction injonction. We will analyze this transformation.
Results
Treatment relative to “illness” neglects subjective and social dimensions of alcoholism by focusing on diagnosable lesions that respond to instrumental treatment.
{"title":"La « maladie » alcoolique : une approche critique du concept de « maladie » en addictologie","authors":"L. Chagneaud, M. Roques","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2025.100566","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.inan.2025.100566","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Alcohol is considered as cultural object since such time. Drinkers who deviate from the norm of “drinking well” are therefore marginalized, deviating from social norms.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The aim of this article is to question the origin of the term “disease” in the field of addiction care and its consequences for addict people.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>When they lose their normativity, rather than their normality, drinkers seek help from healthcare facilities. Drinkers move from stigmatization to “un-guiltification” and becoming dependent on medical normality, which is opposed to social norms because of drastic reduction injonction. We will analyze this transformation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Treatment relative to “illness” neglects subjective and social dimensions of alcoholism by focusing on diagnosable lesions that respond to instrumental treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretations</h3><div>Then, transferential dynamic appears secondly, while projections nevertheless animate therapeutic relationship.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"9 3","pages":"Article 100566"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145468016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-04DOI: 10.1016/j.inan.2025.100561
Alain-Noël Henri , Céline Racin , Raphaël Minjard
{"title":"Le peuple des frontières. Un entretien avec Alain-Noël Henri","authors":"Alain-Noël Henri , Céline Racin , Raphaël Minjard","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2025.100561","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.inan.2025.100561","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"9 3","pages":"Article 100561"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145468014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-03DOI: 10.1016/j.inan.2025.100563
R. Granier , L. Camacho , T. Guenoun
Context
This article is rooted in the pedagogical experience of the university diploma “Concepteur Animateur d’Ateliers à Médiation Artistique” (DUCAAMA). It reflects a polyphonic voice — that of practitioners, clinicians, and educators — engaged in a transdisciplinary framework where art, psychoanalysis, and clinical work intertwine.
Aim
Emphasis is placed on the concept of “trans” as an experiential engine: transformation, translation, transition, transgression.
Method
Through clinical and educational examples carried through different point of views, we explore the effects of artistic mediation on subjectivation processes, symbolization dynamics, and acts of shared creation.
Results
Artistic mediations are to be thought of as essentially transdisciplinary spaces, with their share of shaping participants’ suffering sensory experiences, as well as their share of the untranslatable. It is also by accepting that not everything can be formalized that these spaces can unfold their transformative impact. Training in artistic mediation means training in this dialogue between disciplines and in these discrepancies.
Interpretation
We propose to think of artistic mediation training as a transdisciplinary crossing of the sensitive.
{"title":"Les médiations artistiques : former à la pratique de l’entredeux","authors":"R. Granier , L. Camacho , T. Guenoun","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2025.100563","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.inan.2025.100563","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>This article is rooted in the pedagogical experience of the university diploma “Concepteur Animateur d’Ateliers à Médiation Artistique” (DUCAAMA). It reflects a polyphonic voice — that of practitioners, clinicians, and educators — engaged in a transdisciplinary framework where art, psychoanalysis, and clinical work intertwine.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Emphasis is placed on the concept of “trans” as an experiential engine: transformation, translation, transition, transgression.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Through clinical and educational examples carried through different point of views, we explore the effects of artistic mediation on subjectivation processes, symbolization dynamics, and acts of shared creation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Artistic mediations are to be thought of as essentially transdisciplinary spaces, with their share of shaping participants’ suffering sensory experiences, as well as their share of the untranslatable. It is also by accepting that not everything can be formalized that these spaces can unfold their transformative impact. Training in artistic mediation means training in this dialogue between disciplines and in these discrepancies.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>We propose to think of artistic mediation training as a transdisciplinary crossing of the sensitive.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"9 3","pages":"Article 100563"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145468015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-29DOI: 10.1016/j.inan.2025.100559
V. Piraud, R. Évrard
Contexte
Les organisations rationalistes militantes se posent en « gardiens de la raison » et sont parfois amenées, à ce titre, à discuter de la scientificité et de la rationalité de la psychanalyse.
Objectif
Nous cherchons à comprendre l’épistémologie et les modalités argumentatives de telles organisations.
Méthode
Nous étudions deux exemples de traitement de la psychanalyse par ces organisations entre 1955 et 2024 : dans les publications de l’Union rationaliste et dans les vidéos de la Tronche en Biais, une chaîne diffusée sur YouTube depuis 2014. Nos analyses portent sur les acteurs, les arguments principaux et la place laissée au débat contradictoire.
Résultats
Alors que l’Union rationaliste a régulièrement accepté des débats constructifs sur ce sujet depuis les années 1970, cet intérêt a progressivement disparu. De son côté, les productions de la Tronche en biais sont marquées par une forte virulence et l’absence de débat, ce que nous caractérisons par la part des arguments n’encourageant pas au dialogue.
Interprétations
L’ensemble indique une dégradation des conditions propices au débat scientifique sur la psychanalyse dans l’espace public.
Context
Militant rationalist organizations see themselves as the “guardians of reason”, and as such are sometimes called upon to discuss the scientificity and rationality of psychoanalysis.
Objective
We seek to understand the epistemology and argumentative modalities of such organizations.
Method
We study two examples of these organizations’ treatment of psychoanalysis between 1955 and 2024: in the publications of the Rationalist Union and in the videos of La Tronche en Biais, a channel broadcast on YouTube since 2014.
Results
Our analyses focus on the actors, the main arguments and the space left for contradictory debate. While the Rationalist Union has regularly accepted constructive debate on this subject since the 1970s, this interest has gradually disappeared. For its part, La Tronche en biais's productions are marked by strong virulence and the absence of debate, which we characterize by the proportion of arguments that do not encourage dialogue.
Interpretations
Taken as a whole, this indicates a deterioration in the conditions conducive to scientific debate on psychoanalysis in the public arena.
激进的理性主义组织把自己标榜为“理性的守护者”，有时会以这个身份参与讨论精神分析的科学性和合理性。我们试图理解这种组织的认识论和论证模式。我们研究了这些组织在1955年至2024年期间处理精神分析的两个例子：在理性主义者联盟的出版物中，以及在2014年开始在YouTube上播放的频道La Tronche en Biais的视频中。我们的分析集中在行动者、主要论点和对抗性辩论的空间。其结果是，尽管自20世纪70年代以来，理性主义联盟经常同意就这个问题进行建设性的辩论，但这种兴趣逐渐消失。另一方面，《长矛》的制作具有强烈的毒性和缺乏辩论的特点，我们的特点是不鼓励对话的论点。所有这些都表明，在公共领域，有利于精神分析科学辩论的条件正在恶化。激进的理性主义组织认为自己是“理性的守护者”，因此有时被称为讨论精神分析的科学性和合理性。我们试图理解这种组织的认识论和论证模式。我们研究了这些组织在1955年至2024年间对待精神分析的两个例子：在理性主义者联盟的出版物中，以及在2014年以来在YouTube上播放的La Tronche en Biais频道的视频中。我们的分析集中在行动者、主要论点和为相互矛盾的辩论留下的空间。虽然自20世纪70年代以来，理性主义联盟经常接受关于这个问题的建设性辩论，但这种兴趣逐渐消失。La Tronche en biais的作品以强烈的活力和缺乏辩论为特点，我们的特点是论点的比例不鼓励对话。从整体上看，这表明导致公共领域对精神分析进行科学辩论的条件恶化。
{"title":"La psychanalyse est-elle irrationnelle ? Analyses de l’évolution des critiques issues de groupes militants rationalistes en France (1955–2024)","authors":"V. Piraud, R. Évrard","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2025.100559","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.inan.2025.100559","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Contexte</h3><div>Les organisations rationalistes militantes se posent en « gardiens de la raison » et sont parfois amenées, à ce titre, à discuter de la scientificité et de la rationalité de la psychanalyse.</div></div><div><h3>Objectif</h3><div>Nous cherchons à comprendre l’épistémologie et les modalités argumentatives de telles organisations.</div></div><div><h3>Méthode</h3><div>Nous étudions deux exemples de traitement de la psychanalyse par ces organisations entre 1955 et 2024 : dans les publications de l’Union rationaliste et dans les vidéos de la Tronche en Biais, une chaîne diffusée sur YouTube depuis 2014. Nos analyses portent sur les acteurs, les arguments principaux et la place laissée au débat contradictoire.</div></div><div><h3>Résultats</h3><div>Alors que l’Union rationaliste a régulièrement accepté des débats constructifs sur ce sujet depuis les années 1970, cet intérêt a progressivement disparu. De son côté, les productions de la Tronche en biais sont marquées par une forte virulence et l’absence de débat, ce que nous caractérisons par la part des arguments n’encourageant pas au dialogue.</div></div><div><h3>Interprétations</h3><div>L’ensemble indique une dégradation des conditions propices au débat scientifique sur la psychanalyse dans l’espace public.</div></div><div><h3>Context</h3><div>Militant rationalist organizations see themselves as the “guardians of reason”, and as such are sometimes called upon to discuss the scientificity and rationality of psychoanalysis.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We seek to understand the epistemology and argumentative modalities of such organizations.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We study two examples of these organizations’ treatment of psychoanalysis between 1955 and 2024: in the publications of the Rationalist Union and in the videos of La Tronche en Biais, a channel broadcast on YouTube since 2014.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our analyses focus on the actors, the main arguments and the space left for contradictory debate. While the Rationalist Union has regularly accepted constructive debate on this subject since the 1970s, this interest has gradually disappeared. For its part, La Tronche en biais's productions are marked by strong virulence and the absence of debate, which we characterize by the proportion of arguments that do not encourage dialogue.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretations</h3><div>Taken as a whole, this indicates a deterioration in the conditions conducive to scientific debate on psychoanalysis in the public arena.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"9 3","pages":"Article 100559"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145419791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-24DOI: 10.1016/j.inan.2025.100558
F. Darbellay
<div><h3>Context</h3><div>For several decades, legitimate – even pressing – calls for interdisciplinarity (ID) and transdisciplinarity (TD) have intensified within academic and institutional spheres, both nationally and internationally. This dynamic cannot be reduced to a mere trend; rather, it reflects a profound attempt at adaptation and potential structural transformation of the modes of knowledge production, dissemination, and valorization. It is grounded in a set of epistemological, theoretical, methodological, and practical reflections and advancements, which have progressively contributed to the formation of a substantial and now well-established and recognized body of knowledge on interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity (ITD). This article is fully embedded in this intellectual and institutional maturation. It seeks to shed new light on the definitional issues surrounding these concepts, while proposing avenues for the development and rethinking of the epistemic and practical frameworks in which they are situated.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This article pursues two main objectives. First, it aims to clarify the concepts of interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity (ITD) by situating them within the dynamic network of related concepts such as disciplinarity and multidisciplinarity, while addressing the terminological issues and tensions these notions raise. This clarification then leads to a rethinking of the very idea of disciplinarity, insofar as the hypothesis that ITD operates within, between, and beyond disciplinary boundaries necessitates a reconceptualization of disciplinary logics themselves.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The analysis is based on a critical perspective of the scientific literature dedicated to interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity. It adopts an analytical, exploratory, and forward-looking stance, mobilizing a theoretical and reflective approach. The article focuses particularly on the conceptual articulations at play within the field of inter- and transdisciplinary studies, with the aim of transforming the relationship to disciplines and identifying key trends and new directions for research, teaching, and institutional structuring.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Several significant findings emerge from this analysis. First, despite real progress in discourse and intent, the practical implementation of interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity continues to face numerous obstacles. These barriers are epistemological – due to sometimes incompatible theoretical foundations between disciplines; theoretical – owing to the difficulty of constructing shared frameworks; and institutional – in light of an academic system still largely structured around compartmentalized disciplinary logics. Furthermore, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity should not be understood as new or autonomous disciplines. Rather, they are dialogical and processual practices, in constant interaction with
{"title":"De la disciplinarité à la transdisciplinarité : entre clarification conceptuelle et refondation épistémologique","authors":"F. Darbellay","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2025.100558","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.inan.2025.100558","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>For several decades, legitimate – even pressing – calls for interdisciplinarity (ID) and transdisciplinarity (TD) have intensified within academic and institutional spheres, both nationally and internationally. This dynamic cannot be reduced to a mere trend; rather, it reflects a profound attempt at adaptation and potential structural transformation of the modes of knowledge production, dissemination, and valorization. It is grounded in a set of epistemological, theoretical, methodological, and practical reflections and advancements, which have progressively contributed to the formation of a substantial and now well-established and recognized body of knowledge on interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity (ITD). This article is fully embedded in this intellectual and institutional maturation. It seeks to shed new light on the definitional issues surrounding these concepts, while proposing avenues for the development and rethinking of the epistemic and practical frameworks in which they are situated.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This article pursues two main objectives. First, it aims to clarify the concepts of interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity (ITD) by situating them within the dynamic network of related concepts such as disciplinarity and multidisciplinarity, while addressing the terminological issues and tensions these notions raise. This clarification then leads to a rethinking of the very idea of disciplinarity, insofar as the hypothesis that ITD operates within, between, and beyond disciplinary boundaries necessitates a reconceptualization of disciplinary logics themselves.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The analysis is based on a critical perspective of the scientific literature dedicated to interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity. It adopts an analytical, exploratory, and forward-looking stance, mobilizing a theoretical and reflective approach. The article focuses particularly on the conceptual articulations at play within the field of inter- and transdisciplinary studies, with the aim of transforming the relationship to disciplines and identifying key trends and new directions for research, teaching, and institutional structuring.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Several significant findings emerge from this analysis. First, despite real progress in discourse and intent, the practical implementation of interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity continues to face numerous obstacles. These barriers are epistemological – due to sometimes incompatible theoretical foundations between disciplines; theoretical – owing to the difficulty of constructing shared frameworks; and institutional – in light of an academic system still largely structured around compartmentalized disciplinary logics. Furthermore, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity should not be understood as new or autonomous disciplines. Rather, they are dialogical and processual practices, in constant interaction with","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"9 3","pages":"Article 100558"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145366084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-24DOI: 10.1016/j.inan.2025.100557
Jean-Marc Talpin , Georges Gaillard
Context
As part of a meta-reflection on contemporary social developments, the aim is to examine the relationship between care and social work professionals and language.
Aims
The authors aim to shed light on the way in which thought appears to be simultaneously grappling with the totalising, sometimes totalitarian, temptation of a single language, and a Babelisation, a multiplication of languages and dialects.
Method
The case study enables us to uncover transference-countertransference movements, and specifically the archaic movements that develop in multi-professional team configurations.
Results
When we listen to these dynamics, what emerges clearly has to do with the psychological processes at play: the passage from conflict to conflictuality, and from the One to the many. This allows us to see group work in action, insofar as it opens up to pluralisation.
Interpretations
Group configurations are characterised by rhythmic movements of unification and pluralisation. Listening to these movements helps to make the work of professionalism and multi-professionalism more fluid.
{"title":"Entre langue unique et Babel des langues : bricoler de la pensée en équipes pluriprofessionnelles","authors":"Jean-Marc Talpin , Georges Gaillard","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2025.100557","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.inan.2025.100557","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>As part of a meta-reflection on contemporary social developments, the aim is to examine the relationship between care and social work professionals and language.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>The authors aim to shed light on the way in which thought appears to be simultaneously grappling with the totalising, sometimes totalitarian, temptation of a single language, and a Babelisation, a multiplication of languages and dialects.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The case study enables us to uncover transference-countertransference movements, and specifically the archaic movements that develop in multi-professional team configurations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>When we listen to these dynamics, what emerges clearly has to do with the psychological processes at play: the passage from conflict to conflictuality, and from the One to the many. This allows us to see group work in action, insofar as it opens up to pluralisation.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretations</h3><div>Group configurations are characterised by rhythmic movements of unification and pluralisation. Listening to these movements helps to make the work of professionalism and multi-professionalism more fluid.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"9 3","pages":"Article 100557"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145366122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-23DOI: 10.1016/j.inan.2025.100560
Svetoslava Nina Urgese
{"title":"À propos de « De la disciplinarité à la transdisciplinarité : entre clarification conceptuelle et refondation épistémologique » de F. Darbellay : vers une hospitalité épistémologique : enjeux politiques, subjectifs et institutionnels des pratiques transdisciplinaires","authors":"Svetoslava Nina Urgese","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2025.100560","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.inan.2025.100560","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"9 3","pages":"Article 100560"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145341040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号