Pub Date : 2024-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.inan.2024.100478
Alain Deneault
Context
The metapsychology expounded by Sigmund Freud in his First Topic of 1915, and the study of anxiety phenomena emphasized in the author's Second Topic from 1923 onwards, provide political ecology with conceptual elements for analyzing phenomena such as ecoanxiety.
Objectives
The aim of this text is to show how the psychic object is constituted in the original psychoanalytic theory, and how this approach enables us to measure the scale of the crisis represented by what is known in political ecology as ecoanxiety, but which is more often than not akin to ecoanguish.
Method
This conceptual approach proceeds by textual analysis, integrating psychoanalytical discourse with philosophical approaches, as was common practice in France during the last third of the 20th century.
Results/Interpretations
The result is an appraisal of the construction of substitute objects that the subjects of the epoch into which the ecological crisis plunges us tend to give themselves, out of an inability to give themselves objects in keeping with the unprecedented scope of today's problems.
{"title":"Économie psychique et écoanxiété. Ce que la théorie freudienne apporte à l’écologie politique","authors":"Alain Deneault","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2024.100478","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.inan.2024.100478","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>The metapsychology expounded by Sigmund Freud in his First Topic of 1915, and the study of anxiety phenomena emphasized in the author's Second Topic from 1923 onwards, provide political ecology with conceptual elements for analyzing phenomena such as ecoanxiety.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The aim of this text is to show how the psychic object is constituted in the original psychoanalytic theory, and how this approach enables us to measure the scale of the crisis represented by what is known in political ecology as ecoanxiety, but which is more often than not akin to ecoanguish.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>This conceptual approach proceeds by textual analysis, integrating psychoanalytical discourse with philosophical approaches, as was common practice in France during the last third of the 20th century.</div></div><div><h3>Results/Interpretations</h3><div>The result is an appraisal of the construction of substitute objects that the subjects of the epoch into which the ecological crisis plunges us tend to give themselves, out of an inability to give themselves objects in keeping with the unprecedented scope of today's problems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"8 3","pages":"Article 100478"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142746750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.inan.2024.100491
Ella Schlesinger PhD (Docteur en psychopathologie et psychologie clinique et en anthropologie) , Liviu Poenaru PhD (Doctor in Psychopathology, Clinical Psychology, Federal Psychotherapist ASP)
{"title":"Cybercapitalisme et inconscient économique : la manipulation invisible des désirs et des comportements","authors":"Ella Schlesinger PhD (Docteur en psychopathologie et psychologie clinique et en anthropologie) , Liviu Poenaru PhD (Doctor in Psychopathology, Clinical Psychology, Federal Psychotherapist ASP)","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2024.100491","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.inan.2024.100491","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"8 3","pages":"Article 100491"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142746749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-21DOI: 10.1016/j.inan.2024.100476
Hila Naot , Eyal Asor
Context
The concept of hygiene plays a significant role in human life, dividing spaces into opposing categories (clean vs. dirty, pure vs. taboo, familiar and uncanny, etc.) in the pursuit of a long and meaningful life. Across multiple disciplines, hygiene encompasses both physical-material and also mental-spiritual-abstract dimensions, and is studied through various lenses—medicine, religious and cultural studies, psychiatry and psychoanalysis, philosophy and more.
Objectives
The article aims to describe and critically analyze the pattern that defines hygiene maintenance mechanisms in multiple spheres of human activity. The analysis include physical and cultural hygiene in external aspects of our lives, as well as mental-spiritual hygiene in the internal spheres. The investigation explores how the mechanism of pursuing the hygiene works to preserve the “clean” or the “pure” by preventing the intrusion of the “dirty” and “polluting” and examines the implications of strict hygiene practices on life and vitality.
Method
This is a theoretical study drawing on interdisciplinary approaches, including medical research on the formation of the concept of hygiene, leading to the presentation of the “hygiene hypothesis”, religious and cultural analysis of concepts of purity and pollution, as explored by Mary Douglas, and Freud's psychoanalytic theory with focus on the concept of the uncanny (unheimlich) as a sphere of life that seems to “pollute” our inner world. The implications of Freud's ideas are further examined in the works of Winnicott and others.
Results
The study reveals that the strict enforcement of hygiene mechanisms, while aiming to eliminate the polluting element entirely, can paradoxically threaten the very vitality it seeks to protect. This paradox appears in different ways but follows a common pattern: the excessive pursuit of cleanliness may inadvertently harm the source of life that hygiene is intended to safeguard.
Interpretations
The article interprets the findings within a broader theoretical framework, and poses questions regarding the balance between the aspiration for purity and the preservation of life's essential vitality. Theoretical implications suggest a need for caution in how hygiene is approached in health policy, and also in contexts like psychology or psychoanalysis. Future research should explore how this balance can be maintained across other fields, such as ethics, media policy in consumer-driven society or education.
{"title":"“There is a crack in everything, That's how the light gets in”. Maintaining hygiene and striving for purity: An interdisciplinary study","authors":"Hila Naot , Eyal Asor","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2024.100476","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.inan.2024.100476","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>The concept of hygiene plays a significant role in human life, dividing spaces into opposing categories (clean vs. dirty, pure vs. taboo, familiar and uncanny, etc.) in the pursuit of a long and meaningful life. Across multiple disciplines, hygiene encompasses both physical-material and also mental-spiritual-abstract dimensions, and is studied through various lenses—medicine, religious and cultural studies, psychiatry and psychoanalysis, philosophy and more.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The article aims to describe and critically analyze the pattern that defines hygiene maintenance mechanisms in multiple spheres of human activity. The analysis include physical and cultural hygiene in external aspects of our lives, as well as mental-spiritual hygiene in the internal spheres. The investigation explores how the mechanism of pursuing the hygiene works to preserve the “clean” or the “pure” by preventing the intrusion of the “dirty” and “polluting” and examines the implications of strict hygiene practices on life and vitality.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>This is a theoretical study drawing on interdisciplinary approaches, including medical research on the formation of the concept of hygiene, leading to the presentation of the “hygiene hypothesis”, religious and cultural analysis of concepts of purity and pollution, as explored by Mary Douglas, and Freud's psychoanalytic theory with focus on the concept of the uncanny (unheimlich) as a sphere of life that seems to “pollute” our inner world. The implications of Freud's ideas are further examined in the works of Winnicott and others.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study reveals that the strict enforcement of hygiene mechanisms, while aiming to eliminate the polluting element entirely, can paradoxically threaten the very vitality it seeks to protect. This paradox appears in different ways but follows a common pattern: the excessive pursuit of cleanliness may inadvertently harm the source of life that hygiene is intended to safeguard.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretations</h3><div>The article interprets the findings within a broader theoretical framework, and poses questions regarding the balance between the aspiration for purity and the preservation of life's essential vitality. Theoretical implications suggest a need for caution in how hygiene is approached in health policy, and also in contexts like psychology or psychoanalysis. Future research should explore how this balance can be maintained across other fields, such as ethics, media policy in consumer-driven society or education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"8 3","pages":"Article 100476"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142704152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-19DOI: 10.1016/j.inan.2024.100479
Liviu Poenaru
{"title":"Impossible régulation de l’inconscient ? À propos de l’article « Inconscient économique et influences non conscientes de la publicité » de D. Courbet","authors":"Liviu Poenaru","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2024.100479","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.inan.2024.100479","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"8 3","pages":"Article 100479"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142703682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-16DOI: 10.1016/j.inan.2024.100474
David Pavón-Cuéllar
Context
The article centers on the formalization of capitalist discourse by Jacques Lacan between 1972 and 1975. Lacan's work on the capitalist discourse follows his theory of the four discourses and serves as a critique of neoliberal capitalism, marking a transition from regulated welfare capitalism to unregulated neoliberalism. It addresses how capitalism, with its inherent structures, influences social bonds, subjectivity, and economic systems.
Objectives
The primary aim is to demonstrate that Lacan's capitalist discourse formalizes neoliberal capitalism by highlighting three key aspects: its inherent cynicism, its link with individualism, and its allowance for the unrestricted enjoyment (jouissance) of capital. The study also aims to bridge Lacanian psychoanalysis and Marxist economic theory to uncover blind spots in Lacan's conceptualization.
Method
A theoretical analysis of Lacan's capitalist discourse is employed, along with a critical examination of works from psychoanalytic thinkers such as Charles Melman, Todd McGowan, Jorge Alemán, and Marxist insights. This interdisciplinary approach allows for a deeper exploration of the nuances of Lacan's discourse.
Results
The results reveal that Lacan's capitalist discourse is an early theoretical exploration of neoliberalism, depicting it as a system characterized by the metonymic movement of capital, which isolates individuals while capital itself enjoys freedom. The discourse explains how capital uses and exploits individuals, bypassing traditional ethical limits and creating a system that appears to serve subjects but ultimately serves only capital.
Interpretation
The capitalist discourse, as elaborated by Lacan, captures the essence of neoliberal capitalism by illustrating how it operates cynically and removes restrictions to the jouissance of capital. Lacan's theory illuminates the oppressive and alienating nature of capitalism, which subjugates individuals and makes them objects in its relentless cycle of accumulation. Through Lacan's framework, the article also interprets the transition from state-regulated capitalism to neoliberalism as a structural evolution driven by technological and financial developments.
{"title":"Capitalist discourse: Marx, Lacan and the neoliberal jouissance of capital","authors":"David Pavón-Cuéllar","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2024.100474","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.inan.2024.100474","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>The article centers on the formalization of capitalist discourse by Jacques Lacan between 1972 and 1975. Lacan's work on the capitalist discourse follows his theory of the four discourses and serves as a critique of neoliberal capitalism, marking a transition from regulated welfare capitalism to unregulated neoliberalism. It addresses how capitalism, with its inherent structures, influences social bonds, subjectivity, and economic systems.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The primary aim is to demonstrate that Lacan's capitalist discourse formalizes neoliberal capitalism by highlighting three key aspects: its inherent cynicism, its link with individualism, and its allowance for the unrestricted enjoyment (jouissance) of capital. The study also aims to bridge Lacanian psychoanalysis and Marxist economic theory to uncover blind spots in Lacan's conceptualization.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A theoretical analysis of Lacan's capitalist discourse is employed, along with a critical examination of works from psychoanalytic thinkers such as Charles Melman, Todd McGowan, Jorge Alemán, and Marxist insights. This interdisciplinary approach allows for a deeper exploration of the nuances of Lacan's discourse.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The results reveal that Lacan's capitalist discourse is an early theoretical exploration of neoliberalism, depicting it as a system characterized by the metonymic movement of capital, which isolates individuals while capital itself enjoys freedom. The discourse explains how capital uses and exploits individuals, bypassing traditional ethical limits and creating a system that appears to serve subjects but ultimately serves only capital.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The capitalist discourse, as elaborated by Lacan, captures the essence of neoliberal capitalism by illustrating how it operates cynically and removes restrictions to the jouissance of capital. Lacan's theory illuminates the oppressive and alienating nature of capitalism, which subjugates individuals and makes them objects in its relentless cycle of accumulation. Through Lacan's framework, the article also interprets the transition from state-regulated capitalism to neoliberalism as a structural evolution driven by technological and financial developments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"8 3","pages":"Article 100474"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142663102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-15DOI: 10.1016/j.inan.2024.100475
Sandra Pluchart
Context
The advent of persuasive technologies in our hyper modern society contributes to modifying the way individuals interact with social networks. This modification, which falls under the Idea of Pharmakon, bears implications as to how social link is produced/made. These technologies are also a marker of the rise of a civilisation based on technoscience and the market economy, thus annunciating changes in the possibilities of subjectivation.
Goal
In this article we are questioning the features and psychic repercussions of this specific relationship the contemporary subject builds with social network in which persuasive technologies are involved. This mainly relies on personalised content, proposed in an implicit manner.
Methodology
We collected information from testimonies, semi conducted research interviews and propose in the article to explore in depth one specific interview which, through the prism of psychoanalysis, allows multiple lines of thought. We rely on qualitative analyse of speech, in which transfert is expressed, along with unconscious processes and psychic symptoms related to this topic.
Results
We have established that some modalities of symptom manifestations may reveal subjectivities caught in a power device carried by the social network, which is saturated with persuasive technologies: the pastoral power.
Interpretation
One may reconsider the Idea of an exclusively psychopathological lecture of psychological pain in order to reveal unconscious means of defence of the subject against this power device on the social network.
{"title":"Quelques enjeux psychiques du pouvoir pastoral appliqué aux technologies persuasives","authors":"Sandra Pluchart","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2024.100475","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.inan.2024.100475","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>The advent of persuasive technologies in our hyper modern society contributes to modifying the way individuals interact with social networks. This modification, which falls under the Idea of Pharmakon, bears implications as to how social link is produced/made. These technologies are also a marker of the rise of a civilisation based on technoscience and the market economy, thus annunciating changes in the possibilities of subjectivation.</div></div><div><h3>Goal</h3><div>In this article we are questioning the features and psychic repercussions of this specific relationship the contemporary subject builds with social network in which persuasive technologies are involved. This mainly relies on personalised content, proposed in an implicit manner.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>We collected information from testimonies, semi conducted research interviews and propose in the article to explore in depth one specific interview which, through the prism of psychoanalysis, allows multiple lines of thought. We rely on qualitative analyse of speech, in which transfert is expressed, along with unconscious processes and psychic symptoms related to this topic.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We have established that some modalities of symptom manifestations may reveal subjectivities caught in a power device carried by the social network, which is saturated with persuasive technologies: the pastoral power.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>One may reconsider the Idea of an exclusively psychopathological lecture of psychological pain in order to reveal unconscious means of defence of the subject against this power device on the social network.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"8 3","pages":"Article 100475"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142663099","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-12DOI: 10.1016/j.inan.2024.100477
Fabrice Bourlez
Context
This article explores the interactions between psychoanalysis, queer theory, and the political and clinical implications of critiques against the Oedipus complex, particularly through the works of Deleuze, Guattari, and Halberstam. It aims to analyze how alternative theoretical perspectives, drawn from social and cultural criticism, can renew classical psychoanalytic approaches, particularly in addressing traditional symbolic structures.
Objectives
The main objective of the article is to question the current relevance of the Oedipus complex in psychoanalytic practice, in light of critiques from queer and post-structuralist theories. It seeks to demonstrate that the failure of the Oedipal paradigm can be seen not as an obstacle but as a path toward theoretical and clinical renewal, opening up new perspectives on subjectivities and social dynamics.
Method
The author employs a theoretical analysis, based on a cross-reading of Deleuze and Guattari's works, notably Anti-Oedipus, and Jack Halberstam's studies on failure in queer culture. The article integrates examples from both popular culture and philosophical reflections to illustrate how failure and non-conformity can become critical tools within the framework of psychoanalysis and clinical practice.
Results
The analysis shows that the critique of Oedipus, as elaborated by Deleuze and Guattari, and the valorization of failure by Halberstam, offer relevant perspectives for rethinking psychoanalytic practice. By rejecting developmental teleology and normative success, these theories allow for an expansion of psychoanalytic praxis, opening it up to more fluid forms of existence and subjectivity, less bound by heteronormative and capitalist expectations. They also facilitate the inclusion of subjects traditionally marginalized, such as sexual and gender minorities, within a more inclusive vision of psychic care.
Interpretation
The article argues that psychoanalysis, if it remains anchored in a rigid reading of the Oedipus complex, risks becoming entrenched in a conservative framework that limits its clinical scope. However, an openness to radical critiques, particularly those emerging from queer theory and social critiques of family and gender, can revitalize psychoanalytic practice and enable it to address contemporary issues. Failure, rather than being seen as a shortcoming of the subject or therapy, can be embraced as a critical stance that challenges social norms and opens up possibilities for subjective and collective reinvention.
{"title":"Des triangles diffus, entre échec queer et Anti-Œdipe : technique, métapsychologie et politique psychanalytique","authors":"Fabrice Bourlez","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2024.100477","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.inan.2024.100477","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>This article explores the interactions between psychoanalysis, queer theory, and the political and clinical implications of critiques against the Oedipus complex, particularly through the works of Deleuze, Guattari, and Halberstam. It aims to analyze how alternative theoretical perspectives, drawn from social and cultural criticism, can renew classical psychoanalytic approaches, particularly in addressing traditional symbolic structures.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The main objective of the article is to question the current relevance of the Oedipus complex in psychoanalytic practice, in light of critiques from queer and post-structuralist theories. It seeks to demonstrate that the failure of the Oedipal paradigm can be seen not as an obstacle but as a path toward theoretical and clinical renewal, opening up new perspectives on subjectivities and social dynamics.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The author employs a theoretical analysis, based on a cross-reading of Deleuze and Guattari's works, notably <em>Anti-Oedipus</em>, and Jack Halberstam's studies on failure in queer culture. The article integrates examples from both popular culture and philosophical reflections to illustrate how failure and non-conformity can become critical tools within the framework of psychoanalysis and clinical practice.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The analysis shows that the critique of Oedipus, as elaborated by Deleuze and Guattari, and the valorization of failure by Halberstam, offer relevant perspectives for rethinking psychoanalytic practice. By rejecting developmental teleology and normative success, these theories allow for an expansion of psychoanalytic praxis, opening it up to more fluid forms of existence and subjectivity, less bound by heteronormative and capitalist expectations. They also facilitate the inclusion of subjects traditionally marginalized, such as sexual and gender minorities, within a more inclusive vision of psychic care.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The article argues that psychoanalysis, if it remains anchored in a rigid reading of the Oedipus complex, risks becoming entrenched in a conservative framework that limits its clinical scope. However, an openness to radical critiques, particularly those emerging from queer theory and social critiques of family and gender, can revitalize psychoanalytic practice and enable it to address contemporary issues. Failure, rather than being seen as a shortcoming of the subject or therapy, can be embraced as a critical stance that challenges social norms and opens up possibilities for subjective and collective reinvention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"8 3","pages":"Article 100477"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142663101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-09DOI: 10.1016/j.inan.2024.100470
J. Vincent
{"title":"Inconscient économique et déni social : une question d'interdisciplinarité","authors":"J. Vincent","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2024.100470","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.inan.2024.100470","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"8 3","pages":"Article 100470"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142663100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-09DOI: 10.1016/j.inan.2024.100471
N. Jacquemet , L. Poenaru
{"title":"Économie comportementale et psychologie clinique face aux défis contemporains. Entretien avec Pr Nicolas Jacquemet","authors":"N. Jacquemet , L. Poenaru","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2024.100471","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.inan.2024.100471","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"8 3","pages":"Article 100471"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142663216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号