Retail gasoline pricing in a subsidized energy market: An empirical analysis from AIDS model for Iran

IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Policy Pub Date : 2023-09-11 DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113812
Siab Mamipour , Ali Asghar Salem , Mohammad Sayadi , Masoumeh Azizkhani
{"title":"Retail gasoline pricing in a subsidized energy market: An empirical analysis from AIDS model for Iran","authors":"Siab Mamipour ,&nbsp;Ali Asghar Salem ,&nbsp;Mohammad Sayadi ,&nbsp;Masoumeh Azizkhani","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The prevailing gasoline pricing policy in Iran has traditionally been the fixed-price policy, where both rationed and non-rationed prices are set below the free-market prices. This long-standing subsidy policy has led to excessive energy consumption, fuel smuggling<span>, and environmental concerns. However, efforts to reform these subsidies have faced social unrest due to abrupt price increases. To address these issues, we propose a new gasoline pricing policy that incorporates socio-economic factors using the AIDS model. We have categorized gasoline consumption into four groups: less than 60 L (current ration), 60 L–80 L, 80 L–120 L, and more than 120 L per month. Results shows that the price elasticity for the 60 L–80 L group is the highest (−0.94), while it is lowest for the above 120 L group (−0.48). Therefore, we recommend avoiding price increases for groups consuming below 80 L per month to prevent social unrest. Also, we suggest implementing a tax rate of 5% for consumption above the current ration. Under the proposed policy, the non-rationed price of gasoline will vary between the ration price and the </span></span>Persian Gulf </span>FOB price, depending on consumption levels. This approach ensures that higher levels of gasoline consumption will be associated with fewer subsidies and welfare benefits, and vice versa.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 113812"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142152300397X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prevailing gasoline pricing policy in Iran has traditionally been the fixed-price policy, where both rationed and non-rationed prices are set below the free-market prices. This long-standing subsidy policy has led to excessive energy consumption, fuel smuggling, and environmental concerns. However, efforts to reform these subsidies have faced social unrest due to abrupt price increases. To address these issues, we propose a new gasoline pricing policy that incorporates socio-economic factors using the AIDS model. We have categorized gasoline consumption into four groups: less than 60 L (current ration), 60 L–80 L, 80 L–120 L, and more than 120 L per month. Results shows that the price elasticity for the 60 L–80 L group is the highest (−0.94), while it is lowest for the above 120 L group (−0.48). Therefore, we recommend avoiding price increases for groups consuming below 80 L per month to prevent social unrest. Also, we suggest implementing a tax rate of 5% for consumption above the current ration. Under the proposed policy, the non-rationed price of gasoline will vary between the ration price and the Persian Gulf FOB price, depending on consumption levels. This approach ensures that higher levels of gasoline consumption will be associated with fewer subsidies and welfare benefits, and vice versa.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
补贴能源市场中的零售汽油定价:来自伊朗艾滋病模型的实证分析
伊朗现行的汽油定价政策传统上是固定价格政策,定量和非定量价格都低于自由市场价格。这种长期的补贴政策导致了过度的能源消耗、燃料走私和环境问题。然而,由于价格突然上涨,改革这些补贴的努力面临着社会动荡。为了解决这些问题,我们提出了一项新的汽油定价政策,该政策利用艾滋病模型纳入了社会经济因素。我们将汽油消耗量分为四组:每月低于60升(当前定量)、60升–80升、80升–120升和超过120升。结果表明,60 L–80 L组的价格弹性最高(-0.94),而120 L以上组的价格弹力最低(-0.48)。因此,我们建议每月消费量低于80 L的组避免涨价,以防止社会动荡。此外,我们建议对超过当前配额的消费实行5%的税率。根据拟议的政策,根据消费水平,非定量汽油价格将在定量价格和波斯湾离岸价格之间变化。这种方法确保了汽油消费水平越高,补贴和福利就会越少,反之亦然。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
期刊最新文献
Policy implications of implementing residential PV solar energy systems in developing regions A multi-phase qualitative study on consumers’ barriers and drivers of electric vehicle use in India: Policy implications The impact of digital economy on energy rebound effect in China: A stochastic energy demand frontier approach Editorial Board The value of decentral flexibility in nodal market design – A case study for Europe 2030
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1