The impact of allocation methods on carbon benefits - a case study of construction waste recycling

IF 11.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Resources Conservation and Recycling Pub Date : 2023-10-21 DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107269
Xiangjin Wang , Beijia Huang , Yao Wang , Junxi Liu , Yuqiong Long , Ichiro Daigo
{"title":"The impact of allocation methods on carbon benefits - a case study of construction waste recycling","authors":"Xiangjin Wang ,&nbsp;Beijia Huang ,&nbsp;Yao Wang ,&nbsp;Junxi Liu ,&nbsp;Yuqiong Long ,&nbsp;Ichiro Daigo","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recycling is crucial to address environmental issues caused by increasing wastes. Recycled materials can replace primary materials and offset greenhouse gas emissions, resulting in a carbon benefit. The environmental burdens and benefits of recycling cause broad discussions about the allocation of the burdens and benefits in life cycle assessment. The recycling situations and recyclability of different materials may be different, therefore, different allocation methods shall be selected. However, a common procedure for selecting the allocation method is missing, which led to difficulty in fairly and reasonably assessing the recycling benefits of wastes from the end-of-life product. In this work, we investigated the impact of carbon emissions in the end-of-life stage with a case of construction wastes. Five allocation methods were selected. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify factors influencing carbon benefit outcomes. Based on the case studies, we summarized the strengths and limitations of different allocation methods. Finally, a policy-oriented framework for selecting an allocation method was proposed. Our work serves as a basis for allocation method selection and also as a reference for quantifying the carbon benefit of recycled wastes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 107269"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344923004032","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recycling is crucial to address environmental issues caused by increasing wastes. Recycled materials can replace primary materials and offset greenhouse gas emissions, resulting in a carbon benefit. The environmental burdens and benefits of recycling cause broad discussions about the allocation of the burdens and benefits in life cycle assessment. The recycling situations and recyclability of different materials may be different, therefore, different allocation methods shall be selected. However, a common procedure for selecting the allocation method is missing, which led to difficulty in fairly and reasonably assessing the recycling benefits of wastes from the end-of-life product. In this work, we investigated the impact of carbon emissions in the end-of-life stage with a case of construction wastes. Five allocation methods were selected. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify factors influencing carbon benefit outcomes. Based on the case studies, we summarized the strengths and limitations of different allocation methods. Finally, a policy-oriented framework for selecting an allocation method was proposed. Our work serves as a basis for allocation method selection and also as a reference for quantifying the carbon benefit of recycled wastes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分配方式对碳效益的影响——以建筑垃圾回收利用为例
回收利用对于解决日益增加的废物造成的环境问题至关重要。回收材料可以取代原材料,抵消温室气体排放,从而带来碳效益。回收的环境负担和效益引起了人们对生命周期评估中负担和效益分配的广泛讨论。不同材料的回收情况和可回收性可能不同,因此应选择不同的分配方法。然而,缺少一个选择分配方法的通用程序,这导致难以公平、合理地评估报废产品废物的回收效益。在这项工作中,我们以建筑垃圾为例,调查了碳排放在报废阶段的影响。选择了五种分配方法。进行了敏感性分析,以确定影响碳效益结果的因素。基于案例研究,我们总结了不同分配方法的优势和局限性。最后,提出了一个面向策略的分配方法选择框架。我们的工作为分配方法的选择提供了基础,也为量化回收废物的碳效益提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
期刊最新文献
Development of sustainable high-performance desert sand concrete: Engineering and environmental impacts of compression casting Stability of China's terrestrial ecosystems carbon sink during 2000-2020 Self-sufficiency of the European Union in critical raw materials for E-mobility Assessing the environmental and economic impacts of intracity express delivery: Pathways for carbon reduction and cost efficiency in China Selective anchoring of phosphate groups coupled with swift interlayer cation exchange for record-high capacity cobalt adsorption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1