Integrated crop-disease models: New frontiers in systems thinking

Jamina Bondad , Matthew Tom Harrison , Jeremy Whish , Susan Sprague , Kara Barry
{"title":"Integrated crop-disease models: New frontiers in systems thinking","authors":"Jamina Bondad ,&nbsp;Matthew Tom Harrison ,&nbsp;Jeremy Whish ,&nbsp;Susan Sprague ,&nbsp;Kara Barry","doi":"10.1016/j.farsys.2023.100004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Impacts of pest and diseases on crop productivity comprise one of the greatest existential threats to food security in the 21<sup>st</sup> century. Despite this, crop models have historically adopted an abiotic lens. Here, we reviewed previous methods aimed at modelling effects of pests on crops and revealed a dearth of integrated approaches that account for pest lifecycles. The few integrated models that do exist tend to be empirical constructs that discount yield, with models of underpinning pest dynamics being extremely rare. Interaction between pests and crops has tended towards pest-induced reductions in plant biomass, leaf area, light interception and/or photosynthetic rates of infected plants, rather than biological modelling of the pest lifecycle <em>per se</em>. The use of process-based models that couple the pest-host interactions and capture the resource competition between the two are more suited to understanding the complexity of the farming system. Given that management interventions – such as crop rotation, intercropping, sowing time, nitrogen fertilisation, planting density and insecticide or fungicide use – underpin host colonisation success, we solicit advances in the modelling of management decisions to mitigate and manage pest and disease populations. Such information will become ever more crucial as global temperatures and extreme weather events increase in frequency and disease infestation proliferates. Harnessing this integrated weather-pest-crop-management continuum within farming systems models will improve farm management decisions. We conceptualise a framework using the lifecycle of blackleg disease (<em>Leptosphaeria maculans</em>) as an example; however, our approach could be generically adapted to other crop-pest interactions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100522,"journal":{"name":"Farming System","volume":"1 1","pages":"Article 100004"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farming System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949911923000047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Impacts of pest and diseases on crop productivity comprise one of the greatest existential threats to food security in the 21st century. Despite this, crop models have historically adopted an abiotic lens. Here, we reviewed previous methods aimed at modelling effects of pests on crops and revealed a dearth of integrated approaches that account for pest lifecycles. The few integrated models that do exist tend to be empirical constructs that discount yield, with models of underpinning pest dynamics being extremely rare. Interaction between pests and crops has tended towards pest-induced reductions in plant biomass, leaf area, light interception and/or photosynthetic rates of infected plants, rather than biological modelling of the pest lifecycle per se. The use of process-based models that couple the pest-host interactions and capture the resource competition between the two are more suited to understanding the complexity of the farming system. Given that management interventions – such as crop rotation, intercropping, sowing time, nitrogen fertilisation, planting density and insecticide or fungicide use – underpin host colonisation success, we solicit advances in the modelling of management decisions to mitigate and manage pest and disease populations. Such information will become ever more crucial as global temperatures and extreme weather events increase in frequency and disease infestation proliferates. Harnessing this integrated weather-pest-crop-management continuum within farming systems models will improve farm management decisions. We conceptualise a framework using the lifecycle of blackleg disease (Leptosphaeria maculans) as an example; however, our approach could be generically adapted to other crop-pest interactions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作物病害综合模型:系统思维的新前沿
病虫害对作物生产力的影响是21世纪粮食安全面临的最大生存威胁之一。尽管如此,作物模型在历史上一直采用非生物视角。在这里,我们回顾了以前旨在模拟害虫对作物影响的方法,并揭示了缺乏考虑害虫生命周期的综合方法。现有的为数不多的综合模型往往是对产量进行折现的实证构建,而支撑害虫动态的模型极为罕见。害虫和作物之间的相互作用倾向于由害虫引起的受感染植物的植物生物量、叶面积、光截获和/或光合速率的降低,而不是对害虫生命周期本身进行生物建模。使用基于过程的模型,将害虫与宿主的相互作用结合起来,捕捉两者之间的资源竞争,更适合理解农业系统的复杂性。鉴于管理干预措施——如轮作、间作、播种时间、氮肥施肥、种植密度和杀虫剂或杀菌剂的使用——是寄主定植成功的基础,我们寻求在管理决策建模方面取得进展,以减轻和管理病虫害种群。随着全球气温和极端天气事件的增加以及疾病侵扰的激增,这些信息将变得越来越重要。在农业系统模型中利用这种综合的天气-有害生物作物管理连续体将改进农场管理决策。我们以黑腿病(Leptosphaeria maculans)的生命周期为例,构思了一个框架;然而,我们的方法可以普遍适用于其他作物-害虫的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the performance of biobased, recovered nitrogen fertilizers in European cropping systems using modelling Multicriteria assessment of recently implemented conservation agriculture cropping systems across farmers’ plots in northwestern Cambodia How has scientific literature addressed crop planning at farm level: A bibliometric-qualitative review Spatiotemporal variation of crop diversification across Eastern Indo Gangetic plains of South Asia Perennial rice – An alternative to the ‘one-sow, one-harvest’ rice production: Benefits, challenges, and future prospects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1