A Multisession Evaluation of a Collaborative Virtual Environment for Arm Rehabilitation

Presence Pub Date : 2020-07-29 DOI:10.1162/pres_a_00331
Maja Gor??i??;Imre Cikajlo;Nika Goljar;Domen Novak
{"title":"A Multisession Evaluation of a Collaborative Virtual Environment for Arm Rehabilitation","authors":"Maja Gor??i??;Imre Cikajlo;Nika Goljar;Domen Novak","doi":"10.1162/pres_a_00331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<para>In recent years, several multi-user virtual environments (VEs) have been developed to promote motivation and exercise intensity in motor rehabilitation. While competitive VEs have been extensively evaluated, collaborative and competitive rehabilitation VEs have seen relatively little study. Therefore, this article presents an evaluation of a VE for post-stroke arm rehabilitation that mimics everyday kitchen tasks and can be used either solo or collaboratively. Twenty subacute stroke survivors exercised with the VE for four sessions, with the first and third sessions involving solo exercise and the other two involving collaborative exercise. Exercise intensity was measured using inertial sensors while motivation was measured with questionnaires. Results showed high motivation and exercise intensity over all four sessions, and 11 of 20 participants preferred collaborative over solo exercise while only 4 preferred solo exercise. However, there were no differences in motivation, exercise duration, or exercise intensity between solo and collaborative sessions. Thus, we cannot currently claim that collaborative exercises are beneficial for upper limb rehabilitation. Future studies should evaluate other collaborative VE designs in different settings (e.g., at home) and with different participant pairs (e.g., patient-unimpaired) to find effective ways to utilize collaborative exercises in motor rehabilitation.</para>","PeriodicalId":101038,"journal":{"name":"Presence","volume":"27 3","pages":"274-286"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1162/pres_a_00331","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Presence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9152189/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In recent years, several multi-user virtual environments (VEs) have been developed to promote motivation and exercise intensity in motor rehabilitation. While competitive VEs have been extensively evaluated, collaborative and competitive rehabilitation VEs have seen relatively little study. Therefore, this article presents an evaluation of a VE for post-stroke arm rehabilitation that mimics everyday kitchen tasks and can be used either solo or collaboratively. Twenty subacute stroke survivors exercised with the VE for four sessions, with the first and third sessions involving solo exercise and the other two involving collaborative exercise. Exercise intensity was measured using inertial sensors while motivation was measured with questionnaires. Results showed high motivation and exercise intensity over all four sessions, and 11 of 20 participants preferred collaborative over solo exercise while only 4 preferred solo exercise. However, there were no differences in motivation, exercise duration, or exercise intensity between solo and collaborative sessions. Thus, we cannot currently claim that collaborative exercises are beneficial for upper limb rehabilitation. Future studies should evaluate other collaborative VE designs in different settings (e.g., at home) and with different participant pairs (e.g., patient-unimpaired) to find effective ways to utilize collaborative exercises in motor rehabilitation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手臂康复协同虚拟环境的多阶段评估
近年来,已经开发了几种多用户虚拟环境(VE)来促进运动康复中的动机和运动强度。虽然竞争性VEs已经得到了广泛的评估,但合作性和竞争性康复VEs的研究相对较少。因此,本文对中风后手臂康复的VE进行了评估,该VE模拟了日常厨房任务,可以单独使用,也可以协同使用。20名亚急性中风幸存者使用VE进行了四次训练,第一次和第三次训练涉及单独训练,另外两次训练涉及协作训练。使用惯性传感器测量运动强度,同时使用问卷测量动机。结果显示,在所有四次训练中,都有很高的动机和锻炼强度,20名参与者中有11人更喜欢合作锻炼,而不是单独锻炼,只有4人更喜欢单独锻炼。然而,单独训练和合作训练在动机、运动持续时间或运动强度方面没有差异。因此,我们目前不能声称合作锻炼对上肢康复有益。未来的研究应评估不同环境(如在家)和不同参与者对(如未受损伤的患者)中的其他协作VE设计,以找到在运动康复中利用协作锻炼的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mismatches between 3D Content Acquisition and Perception Cause More Visually Induced Motion Sickness Tokens of Reality: On the Prospective Nature of Virtual Consciousness Bridging the Headset: Engagement, Collaboration, and Learning in and around Virtual Reality How Interaction Techniques Affect Workload in a Virtual Environment During Multitasking Ten Years of Operating a Center with Large-Scale Virtual-Reality Installations: Developments and Learnings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1