Intercropping organic melon and cowpea combined with return of crop residues increases yields and soil fertility

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Agronomy for Sustainable Development Pub Date : 2023-08-09 DOI:10.1007/s13593-023-00902-y
Mariano Marcos-Pérez, Virginia Sánchez-Navarro, Silvia Martinez-Martinez, María Martínez-Mena, Eloísa García, Raúl Zornoza
{"title":"Intercropping organic melon and cowpea combined with return of crop residues increases yields and soil fertility","authors":"Mariano Marcos-Pérez,&nbsp;Virginia Sánchez-Navarro,&nbsp;Silvia Martinez-Martinez,&nbsp;María Martínez-Mena,&nbsp;Eloísa García,&nbsp;Raúl Zornoza","doi":"10.1007/s13593-023-00902-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The growth of legumes, reduced tillage and addition of crop residues can be regarded as a good alternative in intercropping systems to increase soil organic matter, soil fertility and biodiversity while enhancing crop production and reducing the use of fertilizers. Despite the potential benefits, there is still a research gap about using the combination of cowpea and melon in intercropping to increase productivity and reduce external inputs. Thus, the aims of this study were to: i) assess if crop yield, crop quality and soil physicochemical properties can be improved by intercropping systems between melon (<i>Cucumis melo</i> L.) and cowpea (<i>Vigna unguiculata</i> (L.) Walp.) with reduced tillage and addition of crop residues, compared with a melon monoculture with intensive tillage and removal of crop residues, all grown under organic management; and ii) evaluated if cowpea grown as intercrop with fertilization reduced by 30% in the diversified plots can partially replace the use of fertilizers with no negative effects on total crop production. In this study we compared over three crop cycles monocrops with three different melon-cowpea intercropping patterns: mixed intercropping, row intercropping 1:1 (melon:cowpea) and row intercropping 2:1 (melon:cowpea). Our results, presented in this study, showed that intercropping systems, regardless of the pattern, kept soil organic C levels, while it significantly decreased in melon monoculture. Intercropping also significantly increased soil total N, available P and exchangeable K (0.13%, 62 mg·kg<sup>-1</sup> and 387 mg·kg<sup>-1</sup>, respectively), compared to the melon monocrop (0.11%, 25 mg·kg<sup>-1</sup> and 306 mg·kg<sup>-1</sup>). Total crop production was significantly higher under diversified systems, with land equivalent ratios &gt; 1. Hence, the introduction of cowpea associated with melon, combined with reduced tillage and the incorporation of crop residues could be considered as a feasible strategy for sustainable agriculture, with environmental gains and economic savings for fertilizers and water.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":"43 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-023-00902-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-023-00902-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growth of legumes, reduced tillage and addition of crop residues can be regarded as a good alternative in intercropping systems to increase soil organic matter, soil fertility and biodiversity while enhancing crop production and reducing the use of fertilizers. Despite the potential benefits, there is still a research gap about using the combination of cowpea and melon in intercropping to increase productivity and reduce external inputs. Thus, the aims of this study were to: i) assess if crop yield, crop quality and soil physicochemical properties can be improved by intercropping systems between melon (Cucumis melo L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) with reduced tillage and addition of crop residues, compared with a melon monoculture with intensive tillage and removal of crop residues, all grown under organic management; and ii) evaluated if cowpea grown as intercrop with fertilization reduced by 30% in the diversified plots can partially replace the use of fertilizers with no negative effects on total crop production. In this study we compared over three crop cycles monocrops with three different melon-cowpea intercropping patterns: mixed intercropping, row intercropping 1:1 (melon:cowpea) and row intercropping 2:1 (melon:cowpea). Our results, presented in this study, showed that intercropping systems, regardless of the pattern, kept soil organic C levels, while it significantly decreased in melon monoculture. Intercropping also significantly increased soil total N, available P and exchangeable K (0.13%, 62 mg·kg-1 and 387 mg·kg-1, respectively), compared to the melon monocrop (0.11%, 25 mg·kg-1 and 306 mg·kg-1). Total crop production was significantly higher under diversified systems, with land equivalent ratios > 1. Hence, the introduction of cowpea associated with melon, combined with reduced tillage and the incorporation of crop residues could be considered as a feasible strategy for sustainable agriculture, with environmental gains and economic savings for fertilizers and water.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有机甜瓜和豇豆间作结合作物秸秆还田可提高产量和土壤肥力
种植豆类、减少耕作和添加作物残留物可以被视为间作系统的一个很好的替代方案,以增加土壤有机质、土壤肥力和生物多样性,同时提高作物产量和减少化肥的使用。尽管有潜在的好处,但在间作中使用豇豆和甜瓜的组合来提高生产力和减少外部投入方面仍存在研究空白。因此,本研究的目的是:i)评估甜瓜(Cucumis melo L.)和豇豆(Vigna unguiculata(L.)Walp)之间的间作系统是否可以提高作物产量、作物质量和土壤理化性质与在有机管理下种植的集约耕作和清除作物残留物的甜瓜单一栽培相比,减少耕作和添加作物残留物;以及ii)评估在多样化地块中,作为间作种植的豇豆,如果施肥减少30%,是否可以部分取代肥料的使用,而不会对作物总产量产生负面影响。在本研究中,我们比较了三种不同甜瓜-豇豆间作模式的三个作物周期的单作:混合间作、行间作1:1(甜瓜:豇豆)和行间作2:1(甜瓜:鹰嘴豆)。我们在本研究中提出的结果表明,无论模式如何,间作系统都能保持土壤有机碳水平,而甜瓜单作则显著降低。与甜瓜单作(0.11%、25mg·kg-1和306mg·kg-1)相比,间作还显著增加了土壤总氮、有效磷和交换性钾(分别为0.13%、62mg·kg-1和387mg·kg-1)。在多样化制度下,作物总产量显著较高,土地当量比>;1.因此,引进与甜瓜相关的豇豆,结合减少耕作和掺入作物残留物,可以被视为可持续农业的一项可行战略,既能带来环境效益,又能节省化肥和水的经济成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Agronomy for Sustainable Development 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences. ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels. Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.
期刊最新文献
Restored legume acts as a “nurse” to facilitate plant compensatory growth and biomass production in mown grasslands Introducing intermediate wheatgrass as a perennial grain crop into farming systems: insights into the decision-making process of pioneer farmers Enhancing ecosystem services through direct-seeded rice in middle Indo-Gangetic Plains: a comparative study of different rice establishment practices Transitions to crop residue burning have multiple antecedents in Eastern India Irrigated rice yield plateaus are caused by management factors in Argentina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1