Social science and social physics

Clark Glymour
{"title":"Social science and social physics","authors":"Clark Glymour","doi":"10.1002/bs.3830280205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Social science was born with the ambition to be social physics. In the hands of Galton, Pearson, and their successors, it became instead a search for causal explanations that are of a different logical kind from the explanations provided by celestial mechanics. Many critics of social science continue to demand that the social sciences produce systematic theories explaining social phenomena from general laws. The demand is inappropriate, and is not satisfied by many sciences that provide causal explanations without providing general laws. The unity of the sciences derives from a common conception of rational inquiry, rather than from sameness of technique or theoretical structure.</p>","PeriodicalId":75578,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral science","volume":"28 2","pages":"126-134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bs.3830280205","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bs.3830280205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Social science was born with the ambition to be social physics. In the hands of Galton, Pearson, and their successors, it became instead a search for causal explanations that are of a different logical kind from the explanations provided by celestial mechanics. Many critics of social science continue to demand that the social sciences produce systematic theories explaining social phenomena from general laws. The demand is inappropriate, and is not satisfied by many sciences that provide causal explanations without providing general laws. The unity of the sciences derives from a common conception of rational inquiry, rather than from sameness of technique or theoretical structure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会科学和社会物理学
社会科学生来就有成为社会物理学的雄心。在高尔顿、皮尔逊和他们的后继者手中,它变成了一种寻找因果关系的解释,这种解释与天体力学提供的解释具有不同的逻辑类型。许多社会科学的批评者继续要求社会科学产生从一般规律解释社会现象的系统理论。这种要求是不恰当的,许多科学只提供因果解释而不提供一般规律,不能满足这种要求。科学的统一性来源于理性探究的共同概念,而不是技术或理论结构的同一性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
My role in the assessment program of the office of strategic services A look back at the systems society An application of nonlinear dynamics to the presidential nomination process About the authors Living systems theory as a paradigm for organizational behavior: Understanding humans, organizations, and social processes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1