Glycated haemoglobin HbA1c or HbA1: expression of results

A. Burden
{"title":"Glycated haemoglobin HbA1c or HbA1: expression of results","authors":"A. Burden","doi":"10.1002/j.1528-252X.1994.tb00015.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have been made aware of the importance of glycated haemoglobin results now the DCCT results have been published. We need to know these measurements both for individual patients and for clinic populations so that we can compare the results of treatment and education. We need to know the significance of a patient's results so that we can suitably inform him. This is possible for all centres so long as centres can accurately compare their glycated haemoglobin results with those from the DCCT. In this issue Dr E H McLaren's group' uses the technique of Standard Deviation Scores (SDS) to do this. I thought this was so important that it deserved further comment. There are many different methods of measuring glycated haemoglobin. These different methods affect the results. The method used to collect the blood also alters the resultss.s. The reference intervals (normal ranges) differ widely from laboratory to laboratory, The consequence of all of these factors is that it is difficult to compare results between centres. The SDS should allow accurate comparison but only if performed correctly. To understand SDS you must first understand Standard Deviation. This is a way of quantifying variability. One Standard Deviation is roughly the average distance from the mean of all the observations made in a normal population. It is written ±1 SD. About 95% of a normally distributed population will fall between ±2 SD of the mean, and a little over 99% fall between ±3 SD. The number of Standard Deviations away from the mean allows a score to be produced: the SDS. To use the SDS the data must have a 'normal distribution'. Provided sufficient samples have been taken, a simple histogram will demonstrate if the distribution is normal or if the data are skewed. If the data are positively skewed there are a few very high values, but most fall in the lower levels. Another simple way to see if the data are skewed is to find the midpoint between the highest and the lowest values found in a population; this is called the median. This should be approximately the same as the mean (average). The data from many biological variables are positively skewed. The term 'reference population' is preferable to 'normal population' since it should consist of a large number of healthy individuals, as far as is known. People with diabetes who are not ill could be included, for instance. If these were included then glycated haemoglobin values would be positively skewed. Most positively skewed data require transformation before a reliable standard deviation can be found. This is particularly important for the SDS used to quantitate","PeriodicalId":92116,"journal":{"name":"Practical diabetes international : the journal for diabetes care teams worldwide","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/j.1528-252X.1994.tb00015.x","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical diabetes international : the journal for diabetes care teams worldwide","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1528-252X.1994.tb00015.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We have been made aware of the importance of glycated haemoglobin results now the DCCT results have been published. We need to know these measurements both for individual patients and for clinic populations so that we can compare the results of treatment and education. We need to know the significance of a patient's results so that we can suitably inform him. This is possible for all centres so long as centres can accurately compare their glycated haemoglobin results with those from the DCCT. In this issue Dr E H McLaren's group' uses the technique of Standard Deviation Scores (SDS) to do this. I thought this was so important that it deserved further comment. There are many different methods of measuring glycated haemoglobin. These different methods affect the results. The method used to collect the blood also alters the resultss.s. The reference intervals (normal ranges) differ widely from laboratory to laboratory, The consequence of all of these factors is that it is difficult to compare results between centres. The SDS should allow accurate comparison but only if performed correctly. To understand SDS you must first understand Standard Deviation. This is a way of quantifying variability. One Standard Deviation is roughly the average distance from the mean of all the observations made in a normal population. It is written ±1 SD. About 95% of a normally distributed population will fall between ±2 SD of the mean, and a little over 99% fall between ±3 SD. The number of Standard Deviations away from the mean allows a score to be produced: the SDS. To use the SDS the data must have a 'normal distribution'. Provided sufficient samples have been taken, a simple histogram will demonstrate if the distribution is normal or if the data are skewed. If the data are positively skewed there are a few very high values, but most fall in the lower levels. Another simple way to see if the data are skewed is to find the midpoint between the highest and the lowest values found in a population; this is called the median. This should be approximately the same as the mean (average). The data from many biological variables are positively skewed. The term 'reference population' is preferable to 'normal population' since it should consist of a large number of healthy individuals, as far as is known. People with diabetes who are not ill could be included, for instance. If these were included then glycated haemoglobin values would be positively skewed. Most positively skewed data require transformation before a reliable standard deviation can be found. This is particularly important for the SDS used to quantitate
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖化血红蛋白HbA1c或HbA1:结果表达
我们已经意识到糖化血红蛋白结果的重要性,现在DCCT结果已经公布。我们需要知道个体患者和诊所人群的这些测量值,以便我们可以比较治疗和教育的结果。我们需要知道病人检查结果的重要性,这样我们才能恰当地告知他。这对所有中心都是可能的,只要中心能够准确地将其糖化血红蛋白结果与DCCT的结果进行比较。在本期中,E·H·麦克拉伦博士的研究小组使用了标准偏差评分(SDS)技术来进行这项研究。我认为这非常重要,值得进一步评论。有许多不同的测量糖化血红蛋白的方法。这些不同的方法会影响结果。采集血液的方法也会改变结果。参考区间(正常范围)因实验室而异,所有这些因素的后果是很难比较中心之间的结果。SDS应该允许准确的比较,但前提是操作正确。要理解SDS,首先要理解标准差。这是一种量化可变性的方法。一个标准差大致是正常总体中所有观测值与平均值之间的平均距离。写为±1sd。约95%的正态分布总体落在平均值的±2个标准差之间,略多于99%落在±3个标准差之间。从平均值的标准差数可以得到一个分数:SDS。要使用SDS,数据必须具有“正态分布”。如果采集了足够的样本,一个简单的直方图将显示分布是正态分布还是数据偏态。如果数据是正偏斜的,就会有一些非常高的值,但大多数都在较低的水平。另一种查看数据是否偏斜的简单方法是找到总体中最高值和最低值之间的中点;这叫做中值。这应该与平均值大致相同。来自许多生物变量的数据是正偏斜的。“参考人口”一词比“正常人口”更可取,因为它应由大量健康个体组成,就目前所知。例如,没有生病的糖尿病患者可以被包括在内。如果这些都包括在内,那么糖化血红蛋白的值将是正偏的。在找到可靠的标准偏差之前,大多数正偏斜的数据都需要进行转换。这对于用于定量的SDS尤其重要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Distal revascularisation and the diabetic foot Glycated haemoglobin HbA1c or HbA1: expression of results Psychological aspects of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Treatment of hypoglycaemia by general practitioners Delivering diabetes care: all together now?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1