Hypnotizability and imagery modality preference: Do highs and lows live in the same world?

Giancarlo Carli, Francesca I. Cavallaro, Enrica L. Santarcangelo
{"title":"Hypnotizability and imagery modality preference: Do highs and lows live in the same world?","authors":"Giancarlo Carli,&nbsp;Francesca I. Cavallaro,&nbsp;Enrica L. Santarcangelo","doi":"10.1002/ch.331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Imagery plays an important role in hypnotic phenomena. Recent findings have shown, however, that hypnotized subjects with high (Highs) and low (Lows) susceptibility to hypnosis undergoing guided imagery tasks centred on specific sensory modalities share similar visual imagery ability, but Highs obtain better imagery than Lows when tactile instructions are given. The aim of this experiment was to confirm this finding using instructions of globally reduced perception instead of suggestions centred on specific sensory modalities, assuming that the preferred imagery modality would be the least easily suppressed. Changes in body sway (that are sensitive to cognitive activity because postural control requires attention) were used as indices of possible differences in the cognitive task load in Highs and Lows. The results confirmed the hypothesis that Highs and Lows differ in their preferred imagery modalities, and showed that Highs' body sway was not modified by the simultaneous imagery of globally reduced perception, while Lows increased their sway while perceiving the decreased sensory availability. The Discussion focuses on the similar networks involved in imagery and perception and on possible differences between Highs and Lows in the mechanisms of imagery/perception and sensory-motor integration. Copyright © 2007 British Society of Experimental &amp; Clinical Hypnosis. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":88229,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary hypnosis : the journal of the British Society of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis","volume":"24 2","pages":"64-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ch.331","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary hypnosis : the journal of the British Society of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ch.331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Imagery plays an important role in hypnotic phenomena. Recent findings have shown, however, that hypnotized subjects with high (Highs) and low (Lows) susceptibility to hypnosis undergoing guided imagery tasks centred on specific sensory modalities share similar visual imagery ability, but Highs obtain better imagery than Lows when tactile instructions are given. The aim of this experiment was to confirm this finding using instructions of globally reduced perception instead of suggestions centred on specific sensory modalities, assuming that the preferred imagery modality would be the least easily suppressed. Changes in body sway (that are sensitive to cognitive activity because postural control requires attention) were used as indices of possible differences in the cognitive task load in Highs and Lows. The results confirmed the hypothesis that Highs and Lows differ in their preferred imagery modalities, and showed that Highs' body sway was not modified by the simultaneous imagery of globally reduced perception, while Lows increased their sway while perceiving the decreased sensory availability. The Discussion focuses on the similar networks involved in imagery and perception and on possible differences between Highs and Lows in the mechanisms of imagery/perception and sensory-motor integration. Copyright © 2007 British Society of Experimental & Clinical Hypnosis. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可催眠性和意象形态偏好:高潮和低谷生活在同一个世界吗?
意象在催眠现象中起着重要的作用。然而,最近的研究结果表明,接受催眠的高(高)和低(低)易感性的受试者在接受以特定感官模式为中心的引导意象任务时,具有相似的视觉意象能力,但在给予触觉指示时,高(高)者比低(低)者获得更好的意象。本实验的目的是使用全局减少感知的指示来证实这一发现,而不是以特定感官模式为中心的建议,假设首选的图像模式是最不容易被抑制的。身体摇摆的变化(对认知活动很敏感,因为姿势控制需要注意)被用作高和低认知任务负荷可能差异的指标。结果证实了高、低被试在偏好意象模式上存在差异的假设,并表明高被试的身体摇摆并未受到整体知觉减少的同时意象的影响,而低被试的身体摇摆在感知感官可用性下降时增加了。讨论的重点是涉及意象和知觉的相似网络,以及意象/知觉和感觉-运动整合机制的高点和低点之间可能存在的差异。版权所有©2007英国实验学会;临床催眠。John Wiley &出版;儿子,有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Photo-acoustic stimulation: theoretical background and ten years of clinical experience Preterm labour and clinical hypnosis Mindfulness and the mindful therapist: possible contributions to hypnosis Spiritual-transpersonal hypnosis Lucid dreaming – dreams of clarity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1