Publication bias in studies on the efficacy of hypnosis as a therapeutic tool

Morten Moshagen, Jochen Musch
{"title":"Publication bias in studies on the efficacy of hypnosis as a therapeutic tool","authors":"Morten Moshagen,&nbsp;Jochen Musch","doi":"10.1002/ch.355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In an extensive review of more than 400 hypnotic treatment outcome studies, Flammer and Bongartz (2003) presented meta-analytic evidence supporting the efficacy of hypnosis as a therapeutic tool. Meta-analyses, however, are prone to the problem of selective publication of studies reporting positive outcomes. In the present investigation, we therefore employed a variety of methods to test for the presence of publication bias in the data analysed by Flammer and Bongartz (2003). The results suggest that publication bias may have contributed to the effect size estimate by about one third. However, our analysis also shows that the efficacy of hypnosis is of a substantive nature, and may not be explained on the basis of publication bias alone. Copyright © 2008 British Society of Experimental &amp; Clinical Hypnosis. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":88229,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary hypnosis : the journal of the British Society of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis","volume":"25 2","pages":"94-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ch.355","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary hypnosis : the journal of the British Society of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ch.355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In an extensive review of more than 400 hypnotic treatment outcome studies, Flammer and Bongartz (2003) presented meta-analytic evidence supporting the efficacy of hypnosis as a therapeutic tool. Meta-analyses, however, are prone to the problem of selective publication of studies reporting positive outcomes. In the present investigation, we therefore employed a variety of methods to test for the presence of publication bias in the data analysed by Flammer and Bongartz (2003). The results suggest that publication bias may have contributed to the effect size estimate by about one third. However, our analysis also shows that the efficacy of hypnosis is of a substantive nature, and may not be explained on the basis of publication bias alone. Copyright © 2008 British Society of Experimental & Clinical Hypnosis. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
催眠作为一种治疗工具的有效性研究的发表偏倚
在对400多项催眠治疗结果研究的广泛回顾中,Flammer和Bongartz(2003)提出了元分析证据,支持催眠作为一种治疗工具的有效性。然而,荟萃分析容易出现选择性发表报告积极结果的研究的问题。因此,在本研究中,我们采用了多种方法来检验Flammer和Bongartz(2003)分析的数据中是否存在发表偏倚。结果表明,发表偏倚可能对效应大小估计有大约三分之一的贡献。然而,我们的分析也表明,催眠的功效是实质性的,可能不能仅仅根据发表偏倚来解释。版权所有©2008英国实验学会;临床催眠。John Wiley &出版;儿子,有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Photo-acoustic stimulation: theoretical background and ten years of clinical experience Preterm labour and clinical hypnosis Mindfulness and the mindful therapist: possible contributions to hypnosis Spiritual-transpersonal hypnosis Lucid dreaming – dreams of clarity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1