{"title":"Reducing and reversing pseudomemories with hypnosis†","authors":"Graham F. Wagstaff, Jon Cole, Jacqueline Wheatcroft, Amanda Anderton, Hannah Madden","doi":"10.1002/ch.366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As a forensic memory enhancement tool, hypnosis is problematic because it tends to increase pseudomemory responses and inflate confidence regardless of accuracy. A variety of evidence suggests that major influences in producing these effects are expectancy and demand characteristics. However, if expectancy and demand characteristics play a role in increasing false positive responses with hypnosis, it may be possible to use the same factors to reduce false positive responses. Some have argued that the standard misinformation effect in nonhypnotic situations may be influenced by expectancy and demand characteristics. Consequently, if subjects are given misleading information followed by an instruction suggesting that hypnosis will reduce the influence of misinformation, hypnosis may reduce rather than increase false positive responses, including spurious confidence in errors. In this paper two studies are described that lend some experimental support for this hypothesis. The first showed that, when participants are not given an opportunity to commit themselves to making errors, the misinformation effect can be eliminated if hypnosis is given together with a suggestion that it will help participants discriminate between correct and incorrect information. The second study showed that a similar posthypnotic suggestion was more effective than a warning alone in reducing or reversing misinformation errors even after participants had committed themselves to reporting such errors. There was no evidence of inflated confidence with hypnosis in either study. Copyright © 2008 British Society of Experimental & Clinical Hypnosis. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":88229,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary hypnosis : the journal of the British Society of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis","volume":"25 3-4","pages":"178-191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ch.366","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary hypnosis : the journal of the British Society of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ch.366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
Abstract
As a forensic memory enhancement tool, hypnosis is problematic because it tends to increase pseudomemory responses and inflate confidence regardless of accuracy. A variety of evidence suggests that major influences in producing these effects are expectancy and demand characteristics. However, if expectancy and demand characteristics play a role in increasing false positive responses with hypnosis, it may be possible to use the same factors to reduce false positive responses. Some have argued that the standard misinformation effect in nonhypnotic situations may be influenced by expectancy and demand characteristics. Consequently, if subjects are given misleading information followed by an instruction suggesting that hypnosis will reduce the influence of misinformation, hypnosis may reduce rather than increase false positive responses, including spurious confidence in errors. In this paper two studies are described that lend some experimental support for this hypothesis. The first showed that, when participants are not given an opportunity to commit themselves to making errors, the misinformation effect can be eliminated if hypnosis is given together with a suggestion that it will help participants discriminate between correct and incorrect information. The second study showed that a similar posthypnotic suggestion was more effective than a warning alone in reducing or reversing misinformation errors even after participants had committed themselves to reporting such errors. There was no evidence of inflated confidence with hypnosis in either study. Copyright © 2008 British Society of Experimental & Clinical Hypnosis. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
催眠减少和逆转虚假记忆
作为一种法医记忆增强工具,催眠是有问题的,因为它倾向于增加假记忆反应,并在不考虑准确性的情况下夸大信心。各种证据表明,产生这些效应的主要影响因素是预期和需求特征。然而,如果期望和需求特征在催眠中增加假阳性反应中起作用,那么可能使用相同的因素来减少假阳性反应。一些人认为,非催眠情况下的标准错误信息效应可能受到期望和需求特征的影响。因此,如果给被试提供误导性信息,然后指示催眠会减少错误信息的影响,催眠可能会减少而不是增加假阳性反应,包括对错误的虚假信心。本文描述了两项研究,为这一假设提供了一些实验支持。第一项研究表明,当参与者没有机会犯错误时,如果在催眠的同时暗示他们可以帮助参与者区分正确和错误的信息,就可以消除错误信息效应。第二项研究表明,在减少或扭转错误信息方面,类似的催眠后暗示比单独的警告更有效,即使参与者已经承诺报告这些错误。在两项研究中都没有证据表明催眠会使人自信膨胀。版权所有©2008英国实验学会;临床催眠。John Wiley &出版;儿子,有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。