Premolar lost, variation gained: Posterior dental proportions in anthropoids and testing adherence to a mammalian developmental model

IF 2.6 2区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY American journal of physical anthropology Pub Date : 2012-03-01 DOI:10.1002/AJPA.22488
Elissa M. Ludeman, Terry Harrison, S. Bailey
{"title":"Premolar lost, variation gained: Posterior dental proportions in anthropoids and testing adherence to a mammalian developmental model","authors":"Elissa M. Ludeman, Terry Harrison, S. Bailey","doi":"10.1002/AJPA.22488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reconstructing patterns of Plio-Pleistocene mammalian faunal exchange between eastern and southern Africa may help us to better understand patterns of evolution within the hominin clade. However, differences in geological context, taphonomic history and collection methods, as well as a lack of a precise chronology in one of the regions, complicate attempts to compare the faunas of the two regions, but access to new comprehensive datasets encouraged us to re-examine this critical time period in the African paleontological record. In this study, we examine the biogeographic histories of three terrestrial African mammalian families whose fossil records span the past 3 million years to test hypotheses related to the evolutionary history of the hominin genus Paranthropus. We used presence/absence data for 117 species from 38 genera within the family Bovidae and 34 species from 15 genera within the families Hyaenidae and Felidae from 52 eastern African and 40 southern African fossil localities. These assemblages were placed into 500 ka time slices and compared at both the genus and species level using the Jaccard index of faunal similarity. Our findings indicate that sampling biases have more effect on the patterns of interchange between eastern and southern African Bovidae than they do the patterns of interchange seen in the Hyaenidae and Felidae. However, even when these biases are taken into account there are persistent differences in the degree of interchange within and between these families. These findings suggest that mammalian groups (including hominins) can have very different histories of exchange between eastern and southern Africa over the past 3 million years. There is no a priori reason why any of the three families we examined is a suitable proxy for the eastern and southern African hyper-megadont and megadont hominin taxa presently included in Paranthropus, but of the three we suggest that the Bovidae is likely to come closest to being an appropriate proxy. The results of this comparative study are consistent with relatively independent evolutionary trajectories in the two regions for the hominins that are presently included in the genus Paranthropus. 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":7587,"journal":{"name":"American journal of physical anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/AJPA.22488","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of physical anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/AJPA.22488","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Reconstructing patterns of Plio-Pleistocene mammalian faunal exchange between eastern and southern Africa may help us to better understand patterns of evolution within the hominin clade. However, differences in geological context, taphonomic history and collection methods, as well as a lack of a precise chronology in one of the regions, complicate attempts to compare the faunas of the two regions, but access to new comprehensive datasets encouraged us to re-examine this critical time period in the African paleontological record. In this study, we examine the biogeographic histories of three terrestrial African mammalian families whose fossil records span the past 3 million years to test hypotheses related to the evolutionary history of the hominin genus Paranthropus. We used presence/absence data for 117 species from 38 genera within the family Bovidae and 34 species from 15 genera within the families Hyaenidae and Felidae from 52 eastern African and 40 southern African fossil localities. These assemblages were placed into 500 ka time slices and compared at both the genus and species level using the Jaccard index of faunal similarity. Our findings indicate that sampling biases have more effect on the patterns of interchange between eastern and southern African Bovidae than they do the patterns of interchange seen in the Hyaenidae and Felidae. However, even when these biases are taken into account there are persistent differences in the degree of interchange within and between these families. These findings suggest that mammalian groups (including hominins) can have very different histories of exchange between eastern and southern Africa over the past 3 million years. There is no a priori reason why any of the three families we examined is a suitable proxy for the eastern and southern African hyper-megadont and megadont hominin taxa presently included in Paranthropus, but of the three we suggest that the Bovidae is likely to come closest to being an appropriate proxy. The results of this comparative study are consistent with relatively independent evolutionary trajectories in the two regions for the hominins that are presently included in the genus Paranthropus. 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
失去前磨牙,获得变异:类人猿的后牙比例和测试对哺乳动物发育模型的依从性
重建上新世-更新世非洲东部和南部哺乳动物的动物交换模式,有助于我们更好地理解人类进化的模式。然而,地质背景、地貌学历史和收集方法的差异,以及其中一个地区缺乏精确的年代学,使得比较这两个地区的动物群的尝试变得复杂,但是获得新的综合数据集鼓励我们重新研究非洲古生物记录中的这一关键时期。在这项研究中,我们研究了三个陆地非洲哺乳动物家族的生物地理历史,它们的化石记录跨越了过去300万年,以检验与人族类人猿属进化历史有关的假设。我们使用了来自东部非洲52个和南部非洲40个化石地点的牛科38属117种和鬣狗科和Felidae科15属34种的存在/缺失数据。这些组合被放置在500 ka的时间片中,并使用Jaccard指数在属和种水平上进行了比较。我们的研究结果表明,抽样偏差对东部和南部非洲牛科之间的交换模式的影响比对鬣狗科和Felidae之间的交换模式的影响更大。然而,即使考虑到这些偏见,这些家庭内部和家庭之间的交流程度仍然存在差异。这些发现表明,在过去的300万年里,哺乳动物群体(包括人类)在非洲东部和南部之间可能有非常不同的交流历史。我们所研究的三个科中没有任何一个是非洲东部和南部的超级巨兽和巨型巨兽人族分类群的合适代表的先验原因,但在这三个科中,我们认为牛科可能最接近于成为一个合适的代表。这一比较研究的结果与两个地区相对独立的进化轨迹相一致,这些人类目前被包括在傍人属中。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Physical Anthropology (AJPA) is the official journal of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists. The Journal is published monthly in three quarterly volumes. In addition, two supplements appear on an annual basis, the Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, which publishes major review articles, and the Annual Meeting Issue, containing the Scientific Program of the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists and abstracts of posters and podium presentations. The Yearbook of Physical Anthropology has its own editor, appointed by the Association, and is handled independently of the AJPA. As measured by impact factor, the AJPA is among the top journals listed in the anthropology category by the Social Science Citation Index. The reputation of the AJPA as the leading publication in physical anthropology is built on its century-long record of publishing high quality scientific articles in a wide range of topics.
期刊最新文献
Migration scale, process, and impact in the Tiwanaku colonies: Paleomobility at the archaeological site of Omo M10 Stone toolmaking energy expenditure differs between novice and expert toolmakers Craniometric variation and the ancestry of modern humans Disentangling social, environmental, and zoonotic transmission pathways of a gastrointestinal protozoan (Blastocystis spp.) in northeast Madagascar Adult mortality in the metropolis of London 1100–1850: A Bayesian view based on osteological data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1