Analysis of best management practice effectiveness and spatiotemporal variability based on different targeting strategies

IF 3.2 3区 地球科学 Q1 Environmental Science Hydrological Processes Pub Date : 2012-10-16 DOI:10.1002/hyp.9577
Subhasis Giri, A. Pouyan Nejadhashemi, Sean Woznicki, Zhen Zhang
{"title":"Analysis of best management practice effectiveness and spatiotemporal variability based on different targeting strategies","authors":"Subhasis Giri,&nbsp;A. Pouyan Nejadhashemi,&nbsp;Sean Woznicki,&nbsp;Zhen Zhang","doi":"10.1002/hyp.9577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, ten best management practices (BMP) were implemented on agricultural areas in the Saginaw River Watershed using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool model based on four targeting methods (Load per Subbasin Area Index (LPSAI), Load per Unit Area Index (LPUAI), Concentration Impact Index (CII), and Load Impact Index (LII)). The effective BMPs both for targeting and non-targeting pollutants were contour farming (CF) (except total nitrogen reduction during total phosphorus targeting scenario), residue management 1000 kg/ha and 2000 kg/ha, strip cropping, recharge structures, terracing, and native grass (NG). In contrast, conservation tillage and no tillage did not reduce significant amount of pollutants for any combination of targeting methods and priority areas. In regard to spatial correlation between targeting methods, a strong relationship was found between the LPSAI and LPUAI methods both for the sediment and total nitrogen targeting scenarios. In addition, a similar result was found between the CII and LPSAI targeting methods. Regarding the spatiotemporal variability of BMP implementation plan, distinct change in priority area was observed in the case of NG implementation by the end of the second year; however, this impact was minimal for CF due to less pollutant reduction efficiency compared to NG. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":13189,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Processes","volume":"28 3","pages":"431-445"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/hyp.9577","citationCount":"61","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.9577","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 61

Abstract

In this study, ten best management practices (BMP) were implemented on agricultural areas in the Saginaw River Watershed using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool model based on four targeting methods (Load per Subbasin Area Index (LPSAI), Load per Unit Area Index (LPUAI), Concentration Impact Index (CII), and Load Impact Index (LII)). The effective BMPs both for targeting and non-targeting pollutants were contour farming (CF) (except total nitrogen reduction during total phosphorus targeting scenario), residue management 1000 kg/ha and 2000 kg/ha, strip cropping, recharge structures, terracing, and native grass (NG). In contrast, conservation tillage and no tillage did not reduce significant amount of pollutants for any combination of targeting methods and priority areas. In regard to spatial correlation between targeting methods, a strong relationship was found between the LPSAI and LPUAI methods both for the sediment and total nitrogen targeting scenarios. In addition, a similar result was found between the CII and LPSAI targeting methods. Regarding the spatiotemporal variability of BMP implementation plan, distinct change in priority area was observed in the case of NG implementation by the end of the second year; however, this impact was minimal for CF due to less pollutant reduction efficiency compared to NG. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于不同目标策略的最佳管理实践有效性及时空变异性分析
在本研究中,采用基于四种目标方法(每子流域面积负荷指数(LPSAI)、每单位面积负荷指数(LPUAI)、浓度影响指数(CII)和负荷影响指数(LII)的水土评估工具模型,在萨吉诺河流域的农业区实施了10项最佳管理实践(BMP)。目标和非目标污染物的有效BMPs分别是等高线耕作(除全磷目标情景下的全氮减少外)、秸秆管理(1000 kg/ha和2000 kg/ha)、带状种植、补给结构、梯田和原生草(NG)。相比之下,保护性耕作和免耕对任何目标方法和优先区域的组合都没有显著减少污染物的数量。在定位方法的空间相关性方面,LPSAI和LPUAI方法在沉积物和总氮的定位情景中都有很强的相关性。此外,在CII和LPSAI靶向方法之间发现了相似的结果。在BMP实施计划的时空变异性方面,到第二年末,在NG实施的情况下,优先区域发生明显变化;然而,由于与天然气相比,CF的污染减排效率较低,因此这种影响很小。版权所有©2012 John Wiley &儿子,有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hydrological Processes
Hydrological Processes 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
313
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Hydrological Processes is an international journal that publishes original scientific papers advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying the movement and storage of water in the environment, and the interaction of water with geological, biogeochemical, atmospheric and ecological systems. Not all papers related to water resources are appropriate for submission to this journal; rather we seek papers that clearly articulate the role(s) of hydrological processes.
期刊最新文献
Features of the Velocity Distribution and Secondary Flow in a Compound Channel With Vegetation Karst Hydrologic Memory Supplements Streamflow During Dry Periods in Snow-Dominated, Mountainous Watersheds Developing a Lateral Terrestrial Water Flow Scheme to Improve the Representation of Land Surface Hydrological Processes in the Noah-MP of WRF-Hydro How Rains and Floods Become Groundwater: Understanding Recharge Pathways With Stable and Cosmogenic Isotopes Spatio-Temporal Variability of Hyporheic Exchange Processes Across a Stream Network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1