The Art of Waiting Humbly: Women Judges Reflect on Vertical Gender Segregation.

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW Feminist Legal Studies Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-18 DOI:10.1007/s10691-023-09533-w
Marína Urbániková, Barbara Havelková, David Kosař
{"title":"The Art of Waiting Humbly: Women Judges Reflect on Vertical Gender Segregation.","authors":"Marína Urbániková, Barbara Havelková, David Kosař","doi":"10.1007/s10691-023-09533-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Central and Eastern European countries (CEE), compared to common law countries but also other civil law countries of Europe, are known for a strikingly high representation of women within judiciaries. This, however, does not mean that equality has been achieved, as women judges do not reach leadership positions at the same rate as their male peers. Taking the Czech Republic as a case study, this contribution explores the barriers women judges face within a CEE judiciary and analyses their reflections on their positions. The interviews with women judges show that while they are well aware of what is holding them back, most of them do not perceive the structurally unequal position of men and women in Czech society and in the judiciary as a problem and accept the consequences as being part of women's destiny. This means that the system currently lacks bottom-up incentives and pressure for change.</p>","PeriodicalId":45822,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Legal Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"259-284"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11496311/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-023-09533-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Central and Eastern European countries (CEE), compared to common law countries but also other civil law countries of Europe, are known for a strikingly high representation of women within judiciaries. This, however, does not mean that equality has been achieved, as women judges do not reach leadership positions at the same rate as their male peers. Taking the Czech Republic as a case study, this contribution explores the barriers women judges face within a CEE judiciary and analyses their reflections on their positions. The interviews with women judges show that while they are well aware of what is holding them back, most of them do not perceive the structurally unequal position of men and women in Czech society and in the judiciary as a problem and accept the consequences as being part of women's destiny. This means that the system currently lacks bottom-up incentives and pressure for change.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚心等待的艺术:女法官对垂直性别隔离的反思。
与英美法系国家和欧洲其他大陆法系国家相比,中欧和东欧国家(CEE)以司法机构中女性比例高而著称。然而,这并不意味着已经实现了平等,因为女法官担任领导职务的比例与男法官并不相同。本文以捷克共和国为例,探讨了女法官在中欧和东欧司法机构中面临的障碍,并分析了她们对自己职位的反思。对女法官的访谈表明,虽然她们清楚地意识到是什么阻碍了她们的发展,但她们中的大多数人并不认为捷克社会和司法机构中男女地位结构性不平等是一个问题,也不认为这些后果是妇女命运的一部分。这意味着目前的制度缺乏自下而上的变革动力和压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Feminist Legal Studies is committed to an internationalist perspective and to the promotion and advancement of feminist scholarship in all areas of law. It aims to publish critical, interdisciplinary, theoretically engaged feminist scholarship relating to law (broadly conceived) and has a particular interest in work that extends feminist debates and analysis by reference to critical and theoretical approaches and perspectives, including postcolonial, transnational and poststructuralist work.  Although the focus of the journal is law, the editorial board encourages the submission of papers from people working outside the academy, as well as academics other than lawyers as well as interdisciplinary work addressing the concerns not only of lawyers but others, women and men, interested in feminist work. The editorial board is a collective drawn from feminists working at leading law schools across the UK. A full list of the editorial board can found on the Journal’s website: http://www.springer.com/law/international/journal/10691?detailsPage=editorialBoardAlongside traditional articles and book reviews Feminist Legal Studies is committed to publishing material that challenges conventional forms of academic writing/knowledge and encourages creative approaches to scholarship, analysis and debate. Such material is normally published in our “Creative Content” section (see Instructions for Authors for more details). The board also welcomes proposals for themed issues of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Labour Law’s (Mis)Management of Menopausal Workers Those Lucky Enough to Transcend Gender: Travis Alabanza, Radical Transfeminism, and the Law Gender-Based Violence and Carceral Feminism in Australia: Towards Decarceral Approaches Separate But Equal: Is Segregated Schooling (Still) Good for Girls? The Art of Waiting Humbly: Women Judges Reflect on Vertical Gender Segregation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1