Analysis of risk factors and the establishment of a risk model for peripherally inserted central catheter thrombosis

Fang Hu , Ruo-Nan Hao , Jie Zhang , Zhi-Cheng Ma
{"title":"Analysis of risk factors and the establishment of a risk model for peripherally inserted central catheter thrombosis","authors":"Fang Hu ,&nbsp;Ruo-Nan Hao ,&nbsp;Jie Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhi-Cheng Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.cnre.2015.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3><strong>Objective</strong></h3><p>To investigate the main risk factors of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) related upper extremity deep venous thrombosis and establish the risk predictive model of PICC-related upper extremity deep venous thrombosis.</p></div><div><h3><strong>Methods</strong></h3><p>Patients with PICC who were hospitalized between January 2014 and July 2015 were studied retrospectively; they were divided into a thrombosis group (<em>n</em> = 52), with patients who had a venous thrombosis complication after PICC, and a no-thrombosis group (<em>n</em> = 144), with patients without venous thrombosis. To compare between the two groups, significantly different variables were selected to perform multivariate logistic regression to establish the risk-predictive model.</p></div><div><h3><strong>Results</strong></h3><p>The PICC catheter history, catheter tip position, and diameter of blood vessel were the key factors for thrombosis. The logistic regression predictive model was as follows: Y = 3.338 + 2.040 × PICC catheter history +1.964× catheter tip position −1.572× diameter of vessel. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the model was 0.872, 95%<em>CI</em> (0.817–0.927). The cut-off point was 0.801, the sensitivity of the model was 0.832, and the specificity was 0.745.</p></div><div><h3><strong>Conclusions</strong></h3><p>The PICC catheterization history, catheter tip position, the diameter of blood vessel were the key factors for thrombosis. The logistic regression risk model based on these factors is reliable for predicting PICC-related upper extremity deep venous thrombosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":57172,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cnre.2015.12.003","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095771816300275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the main risk factors of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) related upper extremity deep venous thrombosis and establish the risk predictive model of PICC-related upper extremity deep venous thrombosis.

Methods

Patients with PICC who were hospitalized between January 2014 and July 2015 were studied retrospectively; they were divided into a thrombosis group (n = 52), with patients who had a venous thrombosis complication after PICC, and a no-thrombosis group (n = 144), with patients without venous thrombosis. To compare between the two groups, significantly different variables were selected to perform multivariate logistic regression to establish the risk-predictive model.

Results

The PICC catheter history, catheter tip position, and diameter of blood vessel were the key factors for thrombosis. The logistic regression predictive model was as follows: Y = 3.338 + 2.040 × PICC catheter history +1.964× catheter tip position −1.572× diameter of vessel. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the model was 0.872, 95%CI (0.817–0.927). The cut-off point was 0.801, the sensitivity of the model was 0.832, and the specificity was 0.745.

Conclusions

The PICC catheterization history, catheter tip position, the diameter of blood vessel were the key factors for thrombosis. The logistic regression risk model based on these factors is reliable for predicting PICC-related upper extremity deep venous thrombosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
周围置管中心静脉血栓形成危险因素分析及风险模型的建立
目的探讨PICC相关上肢深静脉血栓形成的主要危险因素,建立PICC相关上肢深静脉血栓形成的风险预测模型。方法回顾性分析2014年1月~ 2015年7月住院的PICC患者;将其分为血栓形成组(n = 52)和无血栓形成组(n = 144),其中有PICC术后静脉血栓形成并发症。为比较两组间的差异,选取差异显著的变量进行多因素logistic回归,建立风险预测模型。结果PICC导管使用史、导管尖端位置、血管直径是血栓形成的关键因素。logistic回归预测模型为:Y = 3.338 + 2.040 × PICC导管病史+1.964×导管尖端位置- 1.572×血管直径。模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.872,95%CI(0.817-0.927)。分界点为0.801,模型敏感性为0.832,特异性为0.745。结论PICC置管史、导管尖端位置、血管直径是形成血栓的关键因素。基于这些因素的logistic回归风险模型预测picc相关上肢深静脉血栓形成是可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
353
期刊最新文献
医院新型冠状病毒感染疑似病例标准化 转运流程的制定及应用 Leadership theory in clinical practice A study on clinical nursing research trends and hotspots based on bibliometric analysis Perceived health-related stigma among patients with breast cancer Cultural barriers lead to inequitable healthcare access for aboriginal Australians and Torres Strait Islanders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1