Training indicators and quantitative criteria for emergency nurse specialists

Man Jiang, Xin Ao
{"title":"Training indicators and quantitative criteria for emergency nurse specialists","authors":"Man Jiang,&nbsp;Xin Ao","doi":"10.1016/j.cnre.2017.03.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>By constructing a training system of quality evaluation standards for emergency nurse specialist (ENS), we can ensure smooth operations and quality training for ENS.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>First, the frame structure of indicators was designed on the basis of system theory and the balanced scorecard method. Meanwhile, corresponding quantitative standard indicators were compiled through literature analysis and a review of training characteristics. Next, screening indicators were collected through consultation with experts and statistical calculations. The indicators weight coefficient was calculated using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Finally, indicators were validated in two groups of nurses in two different training courses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>(1) We created a three-level indicator system: level-Ⅰ dimensions have 4 indicators, while level-Ⅱ dimensions and level-Ⅲ dimensions have 13 and 34 indicators, respectively; (2) The coefficient of expert's judgment is 0.840, familiarity is 0.914 and authority is 0.877, and the three rounds of coordination coefficient are 0.456, 0.553 and 0.715, respectively; (3) There are at least 56 indicators in alternative quantitative standards; and (4) The alpha reliability value of the indicator system in the two training course had no significant difference (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). The same result was observed when examining two groups of nurses in one training course (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study established a training system of quality evaluation standards for emergency nurse specialists that is objective, reliable, easy to operate and representative according to scientific selection and verification. This system can therefore provide a basis for quality evaluation and targeted improvement for ENS training in addition to promoting health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":57172,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cnre.2017.03.007","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095771817300105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

By constructing a training system of quality evaluation standards for emergency nurse specialist (ENS), we can ensure smooth operations and quality training for ENS.

Methods

First, the frame structure of indicators was designed on the basis of system theory and the balanced scorecard method. Meanwhile, corresponding quantitative standard indicators were compiled through literature analysis and a review of training characteristics. Next, screening indicators were collected through consultation with experts and statistical calculations. The indicators weight coefficient was calculated using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Finally, indicators were validated in two groups of nurses in two different training courses.

Results

(1) We created a three-level indicator system: level-Ⅰ dimensions have 4 indicators, while level-Ⅱ dimensions and level-Ⅲ dimensions have 13 and 34 indicators, respectively; (2) The coefficient of expert's judgment is 0.840, familiarity is 0.914 and authority is 0.877, and the three rounds of coordination coefficient are 0.456, 0.553 and 0.715, respectively; (3) There are at least 56 indicators in alternative quantitative standards; and (4) The alpha reliability value of the indicator system in the two training course had no significant difference (P > 0.05). The same result was observed when examining two groups of nurses in one training course (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

This study established a training system of quality evaluation standards for emergency nurse specialists that is objective, reliable, easy to operate and representative according to scientific selection and verification. This system can therefore provide a basis for quality evaluation and targeted improvement for ENS training in addition to promoting health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊专科护士培训指标和定量标准
目的构建急诊专科护士质量评价标准培训体系,保障急诊专科护士质量培训的顺利开展和质量培训。方法首先,根据系统理论和平衡计分卡法设计指标框架结构;同时,通过文献分析和对培训特点的回顾,编制了相应的定量标准指标。其次,通过咨询专家和统计计算收集筛选指标。采用层次分析法(AHP)计算指标权重系数。结果(1)构建了三级指标体系,level-Ⅰ维度有4个指标,level-Ⅱ维度和level-Ⅲ维度分别有13个指标和34个指标;(2)专家判断系数为0.840,熟悉度系数为0.914,权威性系数为0.877,三轮协调系数分别为0.456、0.553、0.715;(3)备选量化标准中至少有56项指标;(4)两种培训课程中指标体系的α信度值无显著差异(P >0.05)。在对同一培训课程的两组护士进行检查时也观察到相同的结果(P >0.05)。结论本研究通过科学的筛选和验证,建立了客观、可靠、易于操作、具有代表性的急诊专科护士质量评价标准培训体系。因此,除了促进健康之外,该系统还可以为ENS培训提供质量评估和有针对性改进的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
353
期刊最新文献
医院新型冠状病毒感染疑似病例标准化 转运流程的制定及应用 Leadership theory in clinical practice A study on clinical nursing research trends and hotspots based on bibliometric analysis Perceived health-related stigma among patients with breast cancer Cultural barriers lead to inequitable healthcare access for aboriginal Australians and Torres Strait Islanders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1