Effect of feeding a high- or low-rumen escape protein supplement to dry Holstein cows and heifers within 3 weeks of calving on their productive and reproductive performance in the subsequent lactation

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Animal Feed Science and Technology Pub Date : 2004-05-03 Epub Date: 2004-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2003.12.003
P.H Robinson , J.M Moorby , M Arana , T Graham
{"title":"Effect of feeding a high- or low-rumen escape protein supplement to dry Holstein cows and heifers within 3 weeks of calving on their productive and reproductive performance in the subsequent lactation","authors":"P.H Robinson ,&nbsp;J.M Moorby ,&nbsp;M Arana ,&nbsp;T Graham","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2003.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Pregnant Holstein<span> heifers<span> (450) and dry cows (417) within 3 weeks of calving (i.e., close up) were assigned to one of three groups. These groups were offered a low-CP (0.117 of DM) ration based on corn silage, alfalfa cubes, oat hay, corn and barley grain, or a medium-CP (0.144) ration, as the low-CP ration plus 1</span></span></span> <span><span>kg per day per cow of a supplement (0.60 canola meal or </span>rumen protected (RP) canola meal and 0.40 other), or a high-CP (0.166) ration, as the low-CP ration plus 2</span> <span>kg per day per cow of one of the supplements. Use of bovine somatotropin (bST), movement through production groups, and breeding events were determined by the herd manager after calving. Production parameters were pooled to means for cows that successfully completed the lactation. The RP canola meal had an average 0.720 rumen undegraded crude protein content, based upon 16</span> <!-->h in situ incubation, versus 0.252 for untreated canola meal. Primiparous cows produced no more milk or milk components in their full lactation, or had higher peak milk yields, if supplemented with canola meal at any level from either source. However average body condition score in lactation was higher (<em>P</em>&lt;0.01) for cows supplemented with RP canola meal. While multiparous cows supplemented with RP canola meal in their close up dry period peaked at higher levels of milk (<em>P</em>&lt;0.01), they did not produce more milk or milk components during their full lactation. There is no indication that time in the close up group (between 1 and 19 days) had a substantive impact on milk production of multiparous cows, although primiparous cows produced 71<!--> <!-->kg more milk (<em>P</em><span><span>&lt;0.01) in their subsequent lactation for each extra day close up. In general, reproductive performance was not affected by any treatment and small differences among treatments in use of bST were judged to have been unlikely to have impacted milk production among treatments. These results are broadly consistent with results of others, and supportive of recent NRC [Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, 7th rev. ed., update. National Academy of Science, Washington, DC, USA, 2001] protein recommendations for close up heifers and multiparous cows. However the milk production </span>lactation curves of cows of both parities differed between the period prior to bST use and the period of bST use. During the period prior to use of bST, cows supplemented with RP canola meal in the close up period outperformed those supplemented with untreated canola meal, whereas during the period of bST use the reverse occurred, primarily due to cows supplemented with RP canola meal being less responsive to bST. While no convincing explanation exists for this occurrence, its existence supports the high level of RUP determined in situ for the RP canola meal.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"114 1","pages":"Pages 42-57"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2004-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2003.12.003","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840103003523","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2004/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Pregnant Holstein heifers (450) and dry cows (417) within 3 weeks of calving (i.e., close up) were assigned to one of three groups. These groups were offered a low-CP (0.117 of DM) ration based on corn silage, alfalfa cubes, oat hay, corn and barley grain, or a medium-CP (0.144) ration, as the low-CP ration plus 1 kg per day per cow of a supplement (0.60 canola meal or rumen protected (RP) canola meal and 0.40 other), or a high-CP (0.166) ration, as the low-CP ration plus 2 kg per day per cow of one of the supplements. Use of bovine somatotropin (bST), movement through production groups, and breeding events were determined by the herd manager after calving. Production parameters were pooled to means for cows that successfully completed the lactation. The RP canola meal had an average 0.720 rumen undegraded crude protein content, based upon 16 h in situ incubation, versus 0.252 for untreated canola meal. Primiparous cows produced no more milk or milk components in their full lactation, or had higher peak milk yields, if supplemented with canola meal at any level from either source. However average body condition score in lactation was higher (P<0.01) for cows supplemented with RP canola meal. While multiparous cows supplemented with RP canola meal in their close up dry period peaked at higher levels of milk (P<0.01), they did not produce more milk or milk components during their full lactation. There is no indication that time in the close up group (between 1 and 19 days) had a substantive impact on milk production of multiparous cows, although primiparous cows produced 71 kg more milk (P<0.01) in their subsequent lactation for each extra day close up. In general, reproductive performance was not affected by any treatment and small differences among treatments in use of bST were judged to have been unlikely to have impacted milk production among treatments. These results are broadly consistent with results of others, and supportive of recent NRC [Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, 7th rev. ed., update. National Academy of Science, Washington, DC, USA, 2001] protein recommendations for close up heifers and multiparous cows. However the milk production lactation curves of cows of both parities differed between the period prior to bST use and the period of bST use. During the period prior to use of bST, cows supplemented with RP canola meal in the close up period outperformed those supplemented with untreated canola meal, whereas during the period of bST use the reverse occurred, primarily due to cows supplemented with RP canola meal being less responsive to bST. While no convincing explanation exists for this occurrence, its existence supports the high level of RUP determined in situ for the RP canola meal.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产犊3周内饲喂高或低瘤胃逃逸蛋白对干荷斯坦奶牛和小母牛后续泌乳生产和繁殖性能的影响
将怀孕的荷斯坦小母牛(450头)和产犊3周内(即近距离)的干奶牛(417头)分为三组。各组分别饲喂以玉米青贮、苜蓿块、燕麦干草、玉米和大麦谷物为基础的低粗蛋白质(0.117干物质)日粮,或以中粗蛋白质(0.144)日粮作为低粗蛋白质日粮,每头奶牛每天食用1千克补充物(0.60菜籽粕或保护瘤胃(RP)菜籽粕和0.40其他),或以高粗蛋白质(0.166)日粮作为低粗蛋白质日粮,每头奶牛每天食用2千克补充物之一。牛生长激素(bST)的使用、在生产组中的移动和繁殖事件由产犊后的畜群管理者决定。生产参数汇总为成功完成泌乳的奶牛的均值。在原位孵育16小时的基础上,RP菜籽粕的瘤胃未降解粗蛋白质含量平均为0.720,而未经处理的菜籽粕的瘤胃未降解粗蛋白质含量为0.252。初产奶牛在完全哺乳期不会产生更多的牛奶或牛奶成分,或者在任何来源补充任何水平的菜籽粕时都有更高的峰值产奶量。饲粮中添加RP菜籽粕的奶牛泌乳期平均体况评分较高(P<0.01)。虽然在近干期添加RP菜籽粕的多胎奶牛产奶量最高(P<0.01),但在全乳期产奶量并没有增加。没有迹象表明近距离观察组(1 - 19天)的时间对多产奶牛的产奶量有实质性影响,尽管每多近距离观察一天,初产奶牛在随后的泌乳中产奶量增加71公斤(P<0.01)。一般来说,生殖性能不受任何处理的影响,并且在使用bST的处理之间的微小差异被认为不太可能影响不同处理之间的产奶量。这些结果与其他结果大致一致,并支持最近的NRC[奶牛营养需求,第七版,更新]。美国国家科学院,华盛顿特区,美国,2001]小母牛和多产母牛的蛋白质推荐量。然而,两胎奶牛的产乳曲线在使用bST前和使用bST期间存在差异。在使用bST之前的一段时间里,在接近期补充了RP菜籽粕的奶牛的表现优于那些补充了未经处理的菜籽粕的奶牛,而在使用bST期间,情况正好相反,主要是由于补充了RP菜籽粕的奶牛对bST的反应较弱。虽然对这种现象没有令人信服的解释,但它的存在支持了RP菜籽粕的高水平RUP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Feed Science and Technology
Animal Feed Science and Technology 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding. Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome. The journal covers the following areas: Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement) Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins) Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.
期刊最新文献
Greenhouse gas emissions, net energy, and nitrogen balance are not impacted by inclusion of hybrid rye in diets for growing pigs, but ileal digestibility of amino acids and acid-hydrolyzed ether extract is reduced if hybrid rye replaces corn Effects of heat damage and crystalline amino acid supplementation on growth performance of weanling pigs fed diets based on soybean meal and enzyme-treated soybean meal Increasing the dietary inclusion of a soluble limestone has an impact on the digestibility of calcium and phosphorus and phytase efficacy in broilers and pigs Impacts of including sprouted barley in the ration on feedlot performance and carcass traits of Angus steers Harvesting strategies, saline water irrigation, and organic fertilization affect the nutritional value of Gliricidia sepium leave in biosaline production systems?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1