A novel approach for evaluating the performance of real time quantitative loop-mediated isothermal amplification-based methods

Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Biomolecular Detection and Quantification Pub Date : 2014-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bdq.2014.11.001
Gavin J. Nixon , Helle F. Svenstrup , Carol E. Donald , Caroline Carder , Judith M. Stephenson , Stephen Morris-Jones , Jim F. Huggett , Carole A. Foy
{"title":"A novel approach for evaluating the performance of real time quantitative loop-mediated isothermal amplification-based methods","authors":"Gavin J. Nixon ,&nbsp;Helle F. Svenstrup ,&nbsp;Carol E. Donald ,&nbsp;Caroline Carder ,&nbsp;Judith M. Stephenson ,&nbsp;Stephen Morris-Jones ,&nbsp;Jim F. Huggett ,&nbsp;Carole A. Foy","doi":"10.1016/j.bdq.2014.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Molecular diagnostic measurements are currently underpinned by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). There are also a number of alternative nucleic acid amplification technologies, which unlike PCR, work at a single temperature. These ‘isothermal’ methods, reportedly offer potential advantages over PCR such as simplicity, speed and resistance to inhibitors and could also be used for quantitative molecular analysis. However there are currently limited mechanisms to evaluate their quantitative performance, which would assist assay development and study comparisons. This study uses a sexually transmitted infection diagnostic model in combination with an adapted metric termed isothermal doubling time (IDT), akin to PCR efficiency, to compare quantitative PCR and quantitative loop-mediated isothermal amplification (qLAMP) assays, and to quantify the impact of matrix interference. The performance metric described here facilitates the comparison of qLAMP assays that could assist assay development and validation activities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38073,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecular Detection and Quantification","volume":"2 ","pages":"Pages 4-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bdq.2014.11.001","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecular Detection and Quantification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214753514000096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Molecular diagnostic measurements are currently underpinned by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). There are also a number of alternative nucleic acid amplification technologies, which unlike PCR, work at a single temperature. These ‘isothermal’ methods, reportedly offer potential advantages over PCR such as simplicity, speed and resistance to inhibitors and could also be used for quantitative molecular analysis. However there are currently limited mechanisms to evaluate their quantitative performance, which would assist assay development and study comparisons. This study uses a sexually transmitted infection diagnostic model in combination with an adapted metric termed isothermal doubling time (IDT), akin to PCR efficiency, to compare quantitative PCR and quantitative loop-mediated isothermal amplification (qLAMP) assays, and to quantify the impact of matrix interference. The performance metric described here facilitates the comparison of qLAMP assays that could assist assay development and validation activities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种评估实时定量环介导等温扩增方法性能的新方法
分子诊断测量目前的基础是聚合酶链反应(PCR)。与PCR不同的是,还有许多核酸扩增技术可以在单一温度下工作。据报道,这些“等温”方法比PCR具有简单、快速和耐抑制剂等潜在优势,也可用于定量分子分析。然而,目前评估其定量性能的机制有限,这将有助于分析开发和研究比较。本研究使用一种性传播感染诊断模型,结合一种称为等温倍增时间(IDT)的适应性度量,类似于PCR效率,来比较定量PCR和定量环介导等温扩增(qLAMP)测定,并量化基质干扰的影响。这里描述的性能指标有助于qLAMP检测的比较,有助于检测开发和验证活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomolecular Detection and Quantification
Biomolecular Detection and Quantification Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Publisher's Note Establishing essential quality criteria for the validation of circular RNAs as biomarkers qPCR data analysis: Better results through iconoclasm Considerations and quality controls when analyzing cell-free tumor DNA Next-generation sequencing of HIV-1 single genome amplicons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1