Influence of primer & probe chemistry and amplification target on reverse transcription digital PCR quantification of viral RNA

Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Biomolecular Detection and Quantification Pub Date : 2016-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bdq.2016.08.003
Fran Van Heuverswyn, Maria Karczmarczyk , Heinz Schimmel, Stefanie Trapmann, Hendrik Emons
{"title":"Influence of primer & probe chemistry and amplification target on reverse transcription digital PCR quantification of viral RNA","authors":"Fran Van Heuverswyn,&nbsp;Maria Karczmarczyk ,&nbsp;Heinz Schimmel,&nbsp;Stefanie Trapmann,&nbsp;Hendrik Emons","doi":"10.1016/j.bdq.2016.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Compared to other PCR technologies, digital PCR is a potentially highly accurate approach for the quantification of nucleic acid fragments. This study describes the impact of four experimental factors, namely primer and probe chemistry, PCR amplification target, duplexing, and template type, on the measurement results obtained by reverse transcription digital PCR (RT-dPCR) of viral RNA using <em>influenza A</em> virus as a model. Along conventional dual labelled probes (DLP), alternative primer and probe chemistries, including Zip Nucleic Acids (ZNAs), Locked Nucleic Acids (LNAs), and Scorpions<sup>®</sup>, were compared with two RNA template types: i) total genomic RNA extracted from cell cultured influenza A and ii) a synthetically prepared RNA transcript (<em>In vitro</em> transcribed RNA).</p><p>While apparently duplexing or a different PCR target choice did not have a significant influence on the estimated RNA copy numbers, the impact of the choice of primer and probe chemistry and template type differed significantly for some methods. The combined standard uncertainty of the dPCR analysis results has been assessed, taking into account both the repeatability and the intermediate precision of the procedure.</p><p>Our data highlight the importance of dPCR method optimisation and the advantage of using a more sophisticated primer and probe chemistry, which turned out to be dependent on the template type. Considerations are provided with respect to the molecular diagnostics of viral RNA pathogens, and more specifically, for precise quantification of RNA, which is of tremendous importance for the development of RNA calibration materials and the qualification of these calibrants as certified reference materials.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38073,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecular Detection and Quantification","volume":"9 ","pages":"Pages 20-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bdq.2016.08.003","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecular Detection and Quantification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214753516300201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Compared to other PCR technologies, digital PCR is a potentially highly accurate approach for the quantification of nucleic acid fragments. This study describes the impact of four experimental factors, namely primer and probe chemistry, PCR amplification target, duplexing, and template type, on the measurement results obtained by reverse transcription digital PCR (RT-dPCR) of viral RNA using influenza A virus as a model. Along conventional dual labelled probes (DLP), alternative primer and probe chemistries, including Zip Nucleic Acids (ZNAs), Locked Nucleic Acids (LNAs), and Scorpions®, were compared with two RNA template types: i) total genomic RNA extracted from cell cultured influenza A and ii) a synthetically prepared RNA transcript (In vitro transcribed RNA).

While apparently duplexing or a different PCR target choice did not have a significant influence on the estimated RNA copy numbers, the impact of the choice of primer and probe chemistry and template type differed significantly for some methods. The combined standard uncertainty of the dPCR analysis results has been assessed, taking into account both the repeatability and the intermediate precision of the procedure.

Our data highlight the importance of dPCR method optimisation and the advantage of using a more sophisticated primer and probe chemistry, which turned out to be dependent on the template type. Considerations are provided with respect to the molecular diagnostics of viral RNA pathogens, and more specifically, for precise quantification of RNA, which is of tremendous importance for the development of RNA calibration materials and the qualification of these calibrants as certified reference materials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
引物、探针化学及扩增靶点对病毒RNA逆转录数字PCR定量的影响
与其他PCR技术相比,数字PCR是一种潜在的高度精确的核酸片段定量方法。本研究以甲型流感病毒为模型,描述引物与探针化学、PCR扩增靶点、双工、模板类型四个实验因素对病毒RNA逆转录数字PCR (RT-dPCR)测定结果的影响。采用传统的双标记探针(DLP),将不同的引物和探针化学物,包括Zip核酸(ZNAs)、锁定核酸(LNAs)和Scorpions®,与两种RNA模板类型进行比较:i)从细胞培养的甲型流感病毒中提取的总基因组RNA和ii)合成制备的RNA转录物(体外转录RNA)。虽然明显的双工或不同的PCR靶点选择对估计的RNA拷贝数没有显著影响,但在某些方法中,引物和探针化学选择以及模板类型的影响存在显著差异。考虑到该程序的重复性和中间精度,对dPCR分析结果的联合标准不确定度进行了评估。我们的数据强调了dPCR方法优化的重要性,以及使用更复杂的引物和探针化学的优势,这取决于模板类型。考虑到病毒RNA病原体的分子诊断,更具体地说,是RNA的精确定量,这对于RNA校准材料的开发和这些校准物作为认证标准物质的资格是非常重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomolecular Detection and Quantification
Biomolecular Detection and Quantification Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Publisher's Note Establishing essential quality criteria for the validation of circular RNAs as biomarkers qPCR data analysis: Better results through iconoclasm Considerations and quality controls when analyzing cell-free tumor DNA Next-generation sequencing of HIV-1 single genome amplicons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1