The Peer Review System: A Journal Editor's 30-Year Perspective.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-14 DOI:10.1016/j.cpm.2023.07.009
Warren S Joseph
{"title":"The Peer Review System: A Journal Editor's 30-Year Perspective.","authors":"Warren S Joseph","doi":"10.1016/j.cpm.2023.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The peer review system has become the standard by which scientific articles are refereed. Unfortunately, even from its beginnings in the mid-1800s it has been fraught with difficulties. Potential reviewers are volunteers who may be inundated with requests to review yet these reviews take considerable time and effort. There is little motivation to complete a review causing significant delays in the publication process. There may be biases unintentionally built into the system between reviewers, authors, editors, and journals. Attempts to overcome these biases by various blinding schemes have been met with limited success. Finally, the recent advent of Artificial Intelligence has the potential to completely upend the system, for good or bad.</p>","PeriodicalId":48939,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpm.2023.07.009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The peer review system has become the standard by which scientific articles are refereed. Unfortunately, even from its beginnings in the mid-1800s it has been fraught with difficulties. Potential reviewers are volunteers who may be inundated with requests to review yet these reviews take considerable time and effort. There is little motivation to complete a review causing significant delays in the publication process. There may be biases unintentionally built into the system between reviewers, authors, editors, and journals. Attempts to overcome these biases by various blinding schemes have been met with limited success. Finally, the recent advent of Artificial Intelligence has the potential to completely upend the system, for good or bad.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同行评审制度:期刊编辑的 30 年展望》。
同行评审制度已成为科学文章的评审标准。遗憾的是,即使从 1800 年代中期开始,同行评审制度也一直困难重重。潜在的审稿人都是志愿者,他们可能会被大量的审稿请求淹没,但这些审稿需要花费大量的时间和精力。审稿人完成审稿的积极性不高,导致出版过程严重延误。审稿人、作者、编辑和期刊之间的系统可能无意中存在偏见。人们试图通过各种盲法克服这些偏见,但收效甚微。最后,最近出现的人工智能有可能彻底颠覆这一系统,无论好坏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Each issue of Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery updates you on the latest trends in patient management, keeps you up to date on the newest advances, and provides a sound basis for choosing treatment options. Each issue focuses on a single topic in podiatry and is presented under the direction of an experienced editor. Topics include charcot foot, the diabetic foot, imaging, pain management, ankle arthritis, foot and ankle arthroscopy, bunions, athletic injuries, wound and bone healing, fractures, dislocations, sprains, torn ligaments, amputations, infections, tumors, congenital deformities, and joint destruction.
期刊最新文献
Teaching Science to the Next Generation. Basic Statistics, Statistical Design, and Critical Analysis of Statistics for Surgeons. Prospective Surgical Cohort Analysis. A Primer on Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Special Considerations in Podiatric Science: Translational Research, Cadavers, Gait Analysis, Dermatology, and Databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1