Associations between daily affective experiences, trait and daily rumination on negative and positive affect: a diary study

IF 5 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Journal of Personality Pub Date : 2023-10-26 DOI:10.1111/jopy.12897
Lilla Nóra Kovács, Natália Kocsel, Zsófia Tóth, Tamás Smahajcsik-Szabó, Szilvia Karsai, Gyöngyi Kökönyei
{"title":"Associations between daily affective experiences, trait and daily rumination on negative and positive affect: a diary study","authors":"Lilla Nóra Kovács,&nbsp;Natália Kocsel,&nbsp;Zsófia Tóth,&nbsp;Tamás Smahajcsik-Szabó,&nbsp;Szilvia Karsai,&nbsp;Gyöngyi Kökönyei","doi":"10.1111/jopy.12897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Rumination has mostly been studied in relation to depression, however, it may also occur in response to positive emotions (i.e., positive rumination) and therefore may be a protective factor related to the maintenance of positive mood.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>We hypothesized that daily positive and negative affect would be associated with daily positive and negative rumination even after controlling for trait-level rumination.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>We carried out a diary study with university students (<i>n</i> = 178), where participants had to answer short surveys online about their daily affect and daily rumination every evening for 10 days. We analyzed our data with multilevel regression in <i>R</i>.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Daily positive and negative affect were significantly associated with daily negative and positive rumination, while trait-level rumination scores were not. Daily and trait-level rumination were moderately correlated (<i>r</i> = 0.333–0.440).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings highlight that daily rumination plays a more significant role in daily emotional experiences than trait rumination across positive and negative valence domains. Daily negative affect appears to be more closely related to higher daily negative rumination than the lack of daily positive rumination, which could be relevant for intervention strategies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jopy.12897","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jopy.12897","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Rumination has mostly been studied in relation to depression, however, it may also occur in response to positive emotions (i.e., positive rumination) and therefore may be a protective factor related to the maintenance of positive mood.

Objective

We hypothesized that daily positive and negative affect would be associated with daily positive and negative rumination even after controlling for trait-level rumination.

Method

We carried out a diary study with university students (n = 178), where participants had to answer short surveys online about their daily affect and daily rumination every evening for 10 days. We analyzed our data with multilevel regression in R.

Results

Daily positive and negative affect were significantly associated with daily negative and positive rumination, while trait-level rumination scores were not. Daily and trait-level rumination were moderately correlated (r = 0.333–0.440).

Conclusions

Our findings highlight that daily rumination plays a more significant role in daily emotional experiences than trait rumination across positive and negative valence domains. Daily negative affect appears to be more closely related to higher daily negative rumination than the lack of daily positive rumination, which could be relevant for intervention strategies.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日常情感体验、特质和日常对消极和积极情感的沉思之间的关系:一项日记研究。
引言:反刍大多与抑郁症有关,然而,它也可能发生在对积极情绪的反应中(即积极的反刍),因此可能是与保持积极情绪有关的保护因素。目的:我们假设,即使在控制了特质水平的反刍后,每天的积极和消极情绪也会与每天的积极或消极反刍有关。方法:我们对178名大学生进行了一项日记研究,参与者必须在网上回答关于他们每天晚上的情绪和日常沉思的简短调查,持续十天。我们用R中的多水平回归分析了我们的数据。结果:每日积极和消极情绪与每日消极和积极沉思显著相关,而特质水平的沉思得分则不相关。日常和特质水平的沉思适度相关(r=0.333-0.440)。结论:我们的研究结果强调,在积极和消极的价域中,日常沉思在日常情绪体验中比特质沉思发挥更重要的作用。与缺乏每日积极沉思相比,每日消极影响似乎与较高的每日消极沉思更密切相关,这可能与干预策略有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personality
Journal of Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
6.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: Journal of Personality publishes scientific investigations in the field of personality. It focuses particularly on personality and behavior dynamics, personality development, and individual differences in the cognitive, affective, and interpersonal domains. The journal reflects and stimulates interest in the growth of new theoretical and methodological approaches in personality psychology.
期刊最新文献
Constructing the "Family Personality": Can Family Functioning Be Linked to Parent-Child Interpersonal Neural Synchronization? Neuroticism is Associated With Greater Affective Variability at High Levels of Momentary Affective Well-Being, but With Lower Affective Variability at Low Levels of Momentary Affective Well-Being. Issue Information The Connection Between Dark Traits and Emotional Intelligence: A Multistudy Person-Centered Approach. The Effects of Multifaceted Introversion and Sensory Processing Sensitivity on Solitude-Seeking Behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1