Practical design considerations for secondary air injection in wood-burning cookstoves: An experimental study

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Development Engineering Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.deveng.2020.100049
Julien J. Caubel , Vi H. Rapp , Sharon S. Chen , Ashok J. Gadgil
{"title":"Practical design considerations for secondary air injection in wood-burning cookstoves: An experimental study","authors":"Julien J. Caubel ,&nbsp;Vi H. Rapp ,&nbsp;Sharon S. Chen ,&nbsp;Ashok J. Gadgil","doi":"10.1016/j.deveng.2020.100049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Billions of households worldwide cook using biomass fires and suffer from the toxic smoke emitted into their homes. Laboratory studies of wood-burning cookstoves demonstrate that secondary air injection can greatly reduce the emission of harmful air pollution, but these experimental advancements are not easily translated into practical cookstove designs that can be widely adopted. In this study, we use a modular cookstove platform to experimentally quantify the practical secondary air injection design requirements (e.g., flow rate, pressure, and temperature) to reduce mass emissions of particulate matter (PM), carbon monoxide (CO), and black carbon (BC) by at least 90% relative to a traditional cooking fire. Over the course of 111 experimental trials, we illuminate the physical mechanisms that drive emission reductions, and outline fundamental design principles to optimize cookstove performance. Using the experimental data, we demonstrate that low-cost (&lt;$10) fans and blowers are available to drive the secondary flow, and can be independently powered using an inexpensive thermoelectric generator mounted nearby. Furthermore, size-resolved PM measurements show that secondary air injection inhibits particle growth, but the total number of particles generated remains relatively unaffected. We discuss the potential impacts for human health and investigate methods to mitigate the PM formation mechanisms that persist.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37901,"journal":{"name":"Development Engineering","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100049"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.deveng.2020.100049","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352728520300038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Billions of households worldwide cook using biomass fires and suffer from the toxic smoke emitted into their homes. Laboratory studies of wood-burning cookstoves demonstrate that secondary air injection can greatly reduce the emission of harmful air pollution, but these experimental advancements are not easily translated into practical cookstove designs that can be widely adopted. In this study, we use a modular cookstove platform to experimentally quantify the practical secondary air injection design requirements (e.g., flow rate, pressure, and temperature) to reduce mass emissions of particulate matter (PM), carbon monoxide (CO), and black carbon (BC) by at least 90% relative to a traditional cooking fire. Over the course of 111 experimental trials, we illuminate the physical mechanisms that drive emission reductions, and outline fundamental design principles to optimize cookstove performance. Using the experimental data, we demonstrate that low-cost (<$10) fans and blowers are available to drive the secondary flow, and can be independently powered using an inexpensive thermoelectric generator mounted nearby. Furthermore, size-resolved PM measurements show that secondary air injection inhibits particle growth, but the total number of particles generated remains relatively unaffected. We discuss the potential impacts for human health and investigate methods to mitigate the PM formation mechanisms that persist.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
燃木炉灶二次空气喷射的实际设计考虑:一项实验研究
全球数十亿家庭使用生物质火做饭,并遭受排放到家中的有毒烟雾的危害。对燃木炉灶的实验室研究表明,二次空气喷射可以大大减少有害空气污染的排放,但这些实验进展不容易转化为可广泛采用的实用炉灶设计。在这项研究中,我们使用模块化炉灶平台,通过实验量化实际的二次空气喷射设计要求(例如,流量、压力和温度),以减少颗粒物质(PM)、一氧化碳(CO)和黑碳(BC)的大量排放,相对于传统烹饪火至少减少90%。在111个实验试验的过程中,我们阐明了推动减排的物理机制,并概述了优化炉灶性能的基本设计原则。使用实验数据,我们证明了低成本(<$10)的风扇和鼓风机可用于驱动二次流,并且可以使用安装在附近的廉价热电发电机独立供电。此外,粒径分辨的PM测量结果表明,二次空气注入抑制了颗粒的生长,但产生的颗粒总数相对不受影响。我们讨论了对人类健康的潜在影响,并研究了减轻持续存在的PM形成机制的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Development Engineering
Development Engineering Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
31 weeks
期刊介绍: Development Engineering: The Journal of Engineering in Economic Development (Dev Eng) is an open access, interdisciplinary journal applying engineering and economic research to the problems of poverty. Published studies must present novel research motivated by a specific global development problem. The journal serves as a bridge between engineers, economists, and other scientists involved in research on human, social, and economic development. Specific topics include: • Engineering research in response to unique constraints imposed by poverty. • Assessment of pro-poor technology solutions, including field performance, consumer adoption, and end-user impacts. • Novel technologies or tools for measuring behavioral, economic, and social outcomes in low-resource settings. • Hypothesis-generating research that explores technology markets and the role of innovation in economic development. • Lessons from the field, especially null results from field trials and technical failure analyses. • Rigorous analysis of existing development "solutions" through an engineering or economic lens. Although the journal focuses on quantitative, scientific approaches, it is intended to be suitable for a wider audience of development practitioners and policy makers, with evidence that can be used to improve decision-making. It also will be useful for engineering and applied economics faculty who conduct research or teach in "technology for development."
期刊最新文献
Assessing sustainability focus across global banks Budgeting for SDGs: Quantitative methods to assess the potential impacts of public expenditure Techno-economic scenario analysis of containerized solar energy for use cases at the food/water/health nexus in Rwanda Evaluation of open-ended, clustering, and discrete choice methods for user requirements development in a low-income country context Sensors show long-term dis-adoption of purchased improved cookstoves in rural India, while surveys miss it entirely
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1