Effects of phytogenic feed additives on growth performance and on ammonia and greenhouse gases emissions in growing-finishing pigs

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Animal Feed Science and Technology Pub Date : 2016-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.11.003
P. Bartoš , A. Dolan , L. Smutný , M. Šístková , I. Celjak , M. Šoch , Z. Havelka
{"title":"Effects of phytogenic feed additives on growth performance and on ammonia and greenhouse gases emissions in growing-finishing pigs","authors":"P. Bartoš ,&nbsp;A. Dolan ,&nbsp;L. Smutný ,&nbsp;M. Šístková ,&nbsp;I. Celjak ,&nbsp;M. Šoch ,&nbsp;Z. Havelka","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present study was conducted to evaluate the effects of two commercial phytogenic feed additives (PFAs) on growth performance and emissions of ammonia, methane, nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide compared to an unsupplemented control. The two tested commercial PFAs contained either essential oils or a mixture of essential oils and dried herbs and spices. In addition, both PFAs delivered the same amount of <em>Quillaja saponaria</em> saponins to the final feed, although dosage of the products differed. The PFAs were included in cereal-based grower and finisher diets via premixes. For negative control diet a placebo premix was used. The diets were fed to a total of 81 castrated male growing-finishing pigs (45–114<!--> <!-->kg body weight, 27 per treatment) that were kept in nine gas-tight sealed chambers, each with three pens with fully slatted floors (three pigs per pen). The whole experiment lasted 72 days. Pigs were individually weighted and the feed consumption of pigs was recorded per pen at day 0, 24 and 72 of the experiment. From day 24 to day 72 (48 days) emission measurement took place.</p><p>The inclusion of the PFAs significantly improved average daily feed intake (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.010) and average daily gain (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.018) of pigs over the whole trial period of 72 days compared to the negative control. Feed conversion ratio was not affected by the treatments (<em>P</em> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->0.05). Pigs that were fed with the PFAs had 3.6% higher final body weight (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.017) compared to the negative control. The inclusion of the PFAs reduced ammonia emissions per animal per day (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.003) as well as per kg body weight gain of pigs (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001) on average by 21% and 26%, respectively, and tended to reduce carbon dioxide emissions per kg body weight gain (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.092) on average by 9% compared to the negative control. Methane and nitrous gas emissions were not affected by the inclusion of the PFAs (<em>P</em> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->0.05).</p><p>In summary, it might be speculated that the observed increased intake and consequently higher growth was mediated via flavoring properties of the PFAs, irrespective of differences in composition. The reduction of ammonia emissions most probably was due to the inclusion of the quillaja saponins in the PFAs. It can be concluded that the tested PFAs have a potential as performance enhancers and are useful tools for the reduction of ammonia emissions from pig barns. Further research is warranted to identify the exact modes of action of PFAs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"212 ","pages":"Pages 143-148"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.11.003","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840115300596","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

The present study was conducted to evaluate the effects of two commercial phytogenic feed additives (PFAs) on growth performance and emissions of ammonia, methane, nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide compared to an unsupplemented control. The two tested commercial PFAs contained either essential oils or a mixture of essential oils and dried herbs and spices. In addition, both PFAs delivered the same amount of Quillaja saponaria saponins to the final feed, although dosage of the products differed. The PFAs were included in cereal-based grower and finisher diets via premixes. For negative control diet a placebo premix was used. The diets were fed to a total of 81 castrated male growing-finishing pigs (45–114 kg body weight, 27 per treatment) that were kept in nine gas-tight sealed chambers, each with three pens with fully slatted floors (three pigs per pen). The whole experiment lasted 72 days. Pigs were individually weighted and the feed consumption of pigs was recorded per pen at day 0, 24 and 72 of the experiment. From day 24 to day 72 (48 days) emission measurement took place.

The inclusion of the PFAs significantly improved average daily feed intake (P = 0.010) and average daily gain (P = 0.018) of pigs over the whole trial period of 72 days compared to the negative control. Feed conversion ratio was not affected by the treatments (P > 0.05). Pigs that were fed with the PFAs had 3.6% higher final body weight (P = 0.017) compared to the negative control. The inclusion of the PFAs reduced ammonia emissions per animal per day (P = 0.003) as well as per kg body weight gain of pigs (P < 0.001) on average by 21% and 26%, respectively, and tended to reduce carbon dioxide emissions per kg body weight gain (P = 0.092) on average by 9% compared to the negative control. Methane and nitrous gas emissions were not affected by the inclusion of the PFAs (P > 0.05).

In summary, it might be speculated that the observed increased intake and consequently higher growth was mediated via flavoring properties of the PFAs, irrespective of differences in composition. The reduction of ammonia emissions most probably was due to the inclusion of the quillaja saponins in the PFAs. It can be concluded that the tested PFAs have a potential as performance enhancers and are useful tools for the reduction of ammonia emissions from pig barns. Further research is warranted to identify the exact modes of action of PFAs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
植物性饲料添加剂对生长育肥猪生长性能及氨和温室气体排放的影响
本研究旨在评价两种市售植物性饲料添加剂(PFAs)与未添加的对照相比对生长性能和氨、甲烷、氧化亚氮和二氧化碳排放的影响。这两种被测试的商业全氟烷烃要么含有精油,要么含有精油与干草药和香料的混合物。此外,两种PFAs向最终饲料中输送的皂角皂苷量相同,但产品的用量不同。通过预混料将PFAs添加到以谷物为基础的育肥者和育肥者日粮中。阴性对照饮食使用安慰剂预混料。试验共饲喂81头阉割的雄性生长肥育猪(体重45-114 kg,每个处理27头),饲养在9个气密密封室中,每个室有3个全板条地板的猪圈(每个猪圈3头猪)。试验期72 d。分别称重,记录试验第0、24、72天每栏猪的采食量。从第24天到第72天(48天)进行排放测量。试验期72 d,与阴性对照组相比,添加PFAs显著提高了猪的平均日采食量(P = 0.010)和平均日增重(P = 0.018)。饲料系数不受各处理的影响(P >0.05)。与阴性对照组相比,添加PFAs的猪最终体重提高3.6% (P = 0.017)。添加PFAs降低了每头动物每天的氨排放量(P = 0.003)和猪的每公斤增重(P <0.001),平均分别减少21%和26%,并且与阴性对照相比,每公斤体重增加的二氧化碳排放量平均减少9% (P = 0.092)。甲烷和亚氮排放不受PFAs的影响(P >0.05)。综上所述,可以推测,所观察到的摄取量的增加以及由此导致的更高的生长是通过PFAs的调味特性介导的,而与成分的差异无关。氨排放的减少很可能是由于在PFAs中包含了龙葵皂苷。综上所述,所测试的PFAs具有提高猪生产性能的潜力,是减少猪舍氨排放的有用工具。需要进一步研究以确定PFAs的确切作用模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Feed Science and Technology
Animal Feed Science and Technology 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding. Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome. The journal covers the following areas: Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement) Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins) Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.
期刊最新文献
MRAP2-dependent histidine metabolic pathway mediates the improvement of meat quality and production efficiency in Holstein bulls fed fermented brewer's grains Effects of coffee pulp in the diets of growing lambs on growth, meat quality, and blood parameters Effects of feeding high-moisture corn on growth performance, serum biochemistry, and serum metabolomics in Simmental crossbred bulls Lactic acid bacteria reduce protein degradation in whole-crop maize silage infected with smut disease Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1