Twenty-five years of research on work and organizational psychology: A bibliometric perspective

IF 0.6 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY Anuario de Psicologia Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.anpsic.2017.04.002
Marina Romeo , Montserrat Yepes-Baldó , Sefa Boria-Reverter , José M. Merigó
{"title":"Twenty-five years of research on work and organizational psychology: A bibliometric perspective","authors":"Marina Romeo ,&nbsp;Montserrat Yepes-Baldó ,&nbsp;Sefa Boria-Reverter ,&nbsp;José M. Merigó","doi":"10.1016/j.anpsic.2017.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The research aims to analyze the scientific productivity in the field of work/organizational psychology (WOP) in the last 25 years. We focus our analysis on the most influential journals and articles, generally and for 5-year periods, as well as structures of co-citation among the highest quality journals based on their <em>h</em>-index. We found that a high percentage of papers published each year receive between 5 and 10 cites. Secondly, we observe an exponential increase in the number of papers published, citations, and <em>h</em>-index. Additionally, the number of self-citations significantly increases in the last 5 years. In this sense, we consider that the most recent papers need more time to increase their level of citation and, subsequently, to correct the bias on self-citation. This research shows the status of research in the field of work/organizational psychology, analyzing the scientific journals and papers published in the Web of Science.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44066,"journal":{"name":"Anuario de Psicologia","volume":"47 1","pages":"Pages 32-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.anpsic.2017.04.002","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anuario de Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0066512617300028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The research aims to analyze the scientific productivity in the field of work/organizational psychology (WOP) in the last 25 years. We focus our analysis on the most influential journals and articles, generally and for 5-year periods, as well as structures of co-citation among the highest quality journals based on their h-index. We found that a high percentage of papers published each year receive between 5 and 10 cites. Secondly, we observe an exponential increase in the number of papers published, citations, and h-index. Additionally, the number of self-citations significantly increases in the last 5 years. In this sense, we consider that the most recent papers need more time to increase their level of citation and, subsequently, to correct the bias on self-citation. This research shows the status of research in the field of work/organizational psychology, analyzing the scientific journals and papers published in the Web of Science.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
25年的工作与组织心理学研究:文献计量学视角
本研究旨在分析近25年来工作/组织心理学(WOP)领域的科学生产力。我们的分析重点是最具影响力的期刊和文章,总体上和5年内,以及基于h指数的最高质量期刊的共被引结构。我们发现,每年发表的论文中,有很高比例的论文被引用了5到10次。其次,我们观察到论文发表数量、引用次数和h指数呈指数增长。此外,自引次数在过去5年中显著增加。从这个意义上说,我们认为最新的论文需要更多的时间来提高他们的引用水平,随后,纠正自我引用的偏见。本研究通过分析Web of Science上发表的科学期刊和论文,展示了工作/组织心理学领域的研究现状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
40.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The Anuario de Psicología, one of Spain"s most important general psychology journals, is published by the Faculty of Psychology of the University of Barcelona. It appears three times a year. The Anuario combines continuity with the past with a strong commitment to the present and the future. The journal is broad-ranging, interdisciplinary, and innovative. The Anuario publishes research reports and applied studies in all fields of psychology. We also accept theorical, epistemological studies, organize dossiers on topical themes, and hold debates on controversial subjects deriving from a central article.
期刊最新文献
Efectos directos e indirectos de las actitudes hacia la violencia, la desvinculación moral y las creencias normativas en la violencia escolar Análisis comparativo de las funciones ejecutivas según el nivel de escolaridad en jóvenes adultos residentes en la ciudad de Medellín Evidencias de Validez de la versión Argentina del Cuestionario de Salud del Paciente -9 (CSP-9). Attitudes towards disability in Higher Education Musicoterapia y telehealth: Una revisión sistemática
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1