Institutional factors affecting entrepreneurship: A QCA analysis

IF 7.1 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS European Research on Management and Business Economics Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100187
Pau Sendra-Pons , Irene Comeig , Alicia Mas-Tur
{"title":"Institutional factors affecting entrepreneurship: A QCA analysis","authors":"Pau Sendra-Pons ,&nbsp;Irene Comeig ,&nbsp;Alicia Mas-Tur","doi":"10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A country's institutional framework plays a crucial role in promoting entrepreneurship, which drives economic growth. Encouraging a minimum level of certainty in ambiguous environments characterized by risk taking is important. Aware of this importance, we analyze the influence of institutional factors on entrepreneurship development. Specifically, we analyze political stability, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, a robust rule of law, the ease of starting a new business, and the ease of obtaining credit. We develop two models to explain the presence and absence of entrepreneurship. To do so, we apply qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to a sample of 48 countries using data sourced from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor and the Global Innovation Index. The results show that the effect of institutional factors on the level of entrepreneurship varies according to the socioeconomic characteristics of each country. They suggest that a wide range of institutional configurations lead to the presence or absence of entrepreneurship. Although entrepreneurship can be found in unfavorable institutional environments, future research should examine how to formalize such environments as a standardized institutional configuration to shift from necessity to opportunity entrepreneurship. Achieving this shift is relevant for innovation and economic development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45796,"journal":{"name":"European Research on Management and Business Economics","volume":"28 3","pages":"Article 100187"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444883421000462/pdfft?md5=f199cedcdb6883bf1dd551a2aba965af&pid=1-s2.0-S2444883421000462-main.pdf","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Research on Management and Business Economics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444883421000462","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

A country's institutional framework plays a crucial role in promoting entrepreneurship, which drives economic growth. Encouraging a minimum level of certainty in ambiguous environments characterized by risk taking is important. Aware of this importance, we analyze the influence of institutional factors on entrepreneurship development. Specifically, we analyze political stability, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, a robust rule of law, the ease of starting a new business, and the ease of obtaining credit. We develop two models to explain the presence and absence of entrepreneurship. To do so, we apply qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to a sample of 48 countries using data sourced from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor and the Global Innovation Index. The results show that the effect of institutional factors on the level of entrepreneurship varies according to the socioeconomic characteristics of each country. They suggest that a wide range of institutional configurations lead to the presence or absence of entrepreneurship. Although entrepreneurship can be found in unfavorable institutional environments, future research should examine how to formalize such environments as a standardized institutional configuration to shift from necessity to opportunity entrepreneurship. Achieving this shift is relevant for innovation and economic development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响企业家精神的制度因素:QCA分析
一个国家的制度框架在促进企业家精神方面起着至关重要的作用,企业家精神是经济增长的动力。在以冒险为特征的模糊环境中,鼓励最低限度的确定性是很重要的。意识到这一重要性,我们分析了制度因素对创业发展的影响。具体来说,我们分析了政治稳定性、政府效率、监管质量、健全的法治、开办新企业的难易程度以及获得信贷的难易程度。我们开发了两个模型来解释企业家精神的存在和缺失。为此,我们使用来自全球创业监测和全球创新指数的数据,对48个国家的样本进行了定性比较分析(QCA)。研究结果表明,制度因素对创业水平的影响因各国社会经济特征而异。他们认为,广泛的制度配置导致了企业家精神的存在或缺失。虽然创业可以在不利的制度环境中发现,但未来的研究应该探讨如何将这种环境正式化为一种标准化的制度配置,以从必要性创业转向机会创业。实现这一转变与创新和经济发展息息相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
30
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊介绍: European Research on Management and Business Economics (ERMBE) was born in 1995 as Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa (IEDEE). The journal is published by the European Academy of Management and Business Economics (AEDEM) under this new title since 2016, it was indexed in SCOPUS in 2012 and in Thomson Reuters Emerging Sources Citation Index in 2015. From the beginning, the aim of the Journal is to foster academic research by publishing original research articles that meet the highest analytical standards, and provide new insights that contribute and spread the business management knowledge
期刊最新文献
Board gender diversity and employee productivity. The moderating role of female leaders The impact of government legitimacy on the tourism industry during crises How to enhance the entrepreneurial intentions of the young population in rural areas: An approach from personal values and the socioeconomic environment Effects of ethical leadership on individual learning and unlearning: Mediation through affective commitment Market orientation, integrated marketing communications, and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) performance: A comparison between developed and developing economies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1