Disclosure standards and market efficiency: Evidence from analysts' forecasts

IF 4 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of International Economics Pub Date : 2007-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.11.004
Hui Tong
{"title":"Disclosure standards and market efficiency: Evidence from analysts' forecasts","authors":"Hui Tong","doi":"10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper studies whether recent international transparency initiatives affect information accuracy and dispersion. I show that the impact of these initiatives is limited because public disclosure crowds out private investments in information. I first develop a theoretical model of the incentive to invest in information and the impact of public disclosure. I then analyze stock market analysts' forecasts for thirty developing economies for the period 1990–2004. I find that disclosure standards enhance forecast accuracy directly but at the same time reduce the number of analysts per stock (proxy for private information investments). The net effect of disclosure standards thus ranges from weak to nonexistent.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16276,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Economics","volume":"72 1","pages":"Pages 222-241"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.11.004","citationCount":"63","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022199607000220","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 63

Abstract

This paper studies whether recent international transparency initiatives affect information accuracy and dispersion. I show that the impact of these initiatives is limited because public disclosure crowds out private investments in information. I first develop a theoretical model of the incentive to invest in information and the impact of public disclosure. I then analyze stock market analysts' forecasts for thirty developing economies for the period 1990–2004. I find that disclosure standards enhance forecast accuracy directly but at the same time reduce the number of analysts per stock (proxy for private information investments). The net effect of disclosure standards thus ranges from weak to nonexistent.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
披露标准与市场效率:来自分析师预测的证据
本文研究了最近的国际透明度倡议是否影响信息的准确性和分散性。我指出,这些举措的影响是有限的,因为公开披露会排挤私人对信息的投资。我首先建立了一个关于信息投资动机和公开披露影响的理论模型。然后,我分析了股市分析师对30个发展中经济体1990年至2004年期间的预测。我发现披露标准直接提高了预测的准确性,但同时减少了每只股票的分析师数量(代表私人信息投资)。因此,披露标准的净效应从微弱到不存在不等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: The Journal of International Economics is intended to serve as the primary outlet for theoretical and empirical research in all areas of international economics. These include, but are not limited to the following: trade patterns, commercial policy; international institutions; exchange rates; open economy macroeconomics; international finance; international factor mobility. The Journal especially encourages the submission of articles which are empirical in nature, or deal with issues of open economy macroeconomics and international finance. Theoretical work submitted to the Journal should be original in its motivation or modelling structure. Empirical analysis should be based on a theoretical framework, and should be capable of replication.
期刊最新文献
Historical military conflict, current trade tensions, and global supply chains Labor market polarization and the great urban divergence Protection for sale without aggregation bias Knowledge diffusion through FDI: Worldwide firm-level evidence Services trade and the choice of online versus in-person delivery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1